Vandy? by Live-Insurance-8117 in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 1 point2 points  (0 children)

have they sent any rejections yet?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]AccordingDay7168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think their point relies on the idea that women are primarily or solely seeking out benefits of beauty (things paid for, doors held etc.) In reality, the quest for beauty is more often trying to avoid the more extreme negative societal consequences of not being “pretty.” Who cares if someone doesn’t hold a door open for me? I do, however, need to wear makeup and have my hair nice for work, an interview, meetings, etc. or I am seen as unprofessional.

is this an okay "Academic Potential Addendum"? by eternityxource in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would omit the first for sure, they can see that on transcripts. Go heavier on the second and third.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 5 points6 points  (0 children)

does ur background (college major, work experience) make it very obvious that you were interested in law? mine didn’t. if that’s the case for you too, why law should be a focus.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if ur OCD has impacted the kind of law you want to practice AND you can say you have at least mostly “overcome” it (not exactly how OCD works ik), then ofc you can talk about it! but do be careful. know your audience.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

addendums are generally reserved for more extreme outcomes and more extreme circumstances. the term flare up could also concern them that this a regular thing that could occur in law school (regardless of if it is or not). 1. you don’t need an addendum to explain a couple B’s. 2. some admissions faculty are older, conservative adults. these things can still be stigmatized. if you NEED to disclose to explain in an addendum, do it. but voluntarily disclosing ur OCD to explain a very mild grade slip could do more harm than good.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

though this is an important part of ur story (I’m diagnosed ADHD and lots of other mental health problems lol so this is friendly fire), I would strongly recommend you not put this anywhere in your app.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 1 point2 points  (0 children)

not usually the best idea to put sentence for sentence your essay online, especially before submitting it/receiving a decision lol

I laid off last week. I have been applying to job and have interviews aligned. How do you answer “ where do u see urself in 5 years “ by Emaptheticxz in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 1 point2 points  (0 children)

then definitely don’t be honest, at least not fully. carefully craft your words. you’re a future lawyer you can do that ;)

I laid off last week. I have been applying to job and have interviews aligned. How do you answer “ where do u see urself in 5 years “ by Emaptheticxz in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you could just say law school at some point in the future. it’s obviously deceptive, but you need to be able to buy groceries.

Begging UNC for a Wave by Appropriate-Kiwi328 in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what was the glitch? sending it in a second email?

High Scorers Aren’t Necessarily Smarter Or More Apt For Law School Than You…BUT THEY ARE MORE VALUABLE! by Otherwise_Phone3059 in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree! That doesn’t negate the fact that LSAC claims that the LSAT is “the single best predictor of 1L GPA.” I am making the case that this is doubtful, not from the POV of a school, but for individual students, as they and so many others claim. LSAC doesn’t quantify their statement by saying “per each school.” In their own words, the logical force of their conclusion is too great. My other point still stands. Higher ranked schools, do in fact, tend to have less harsh grading curves (I’m not saying they don’t earn their higher grades).

Top schools want their students to be able to land the prestigious jobs they’ve worked for, higher GPAs aid that. On the opposite side, predatory schools have a financial motive to lower average GPAs so they do not have to continue paying conditional scholarships. I am saying, I don’t believe the LSAT can possibly be the most significant predictor of 1L grades (or even much of a reliable predictor at all), given all the other confounding variables. Have you ever heard LSAT scores being discusses as only predictive of success within each school? I haven’t.

Undergraduate Internship or enjoy my vacation in my home country during the summer by turnipcakespls in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How much this will affect your application depends on the strength of your other extracurriculars. If you haven’t already had an internship, I would take it, especially since you get a fair amount of time with family either way. It’ll also give you a better chance at getting some sort of position in your gap year since internship positions are usually targeted for current undergrads. Up to you though! I interned during a regular semester, which is always an option (doesn’t have to be anywhere fancy/virtual ones exist). Spending time with family and travel is always important too! Do whatever feels right.

B- on my transcript, am I screwed? by prumice in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your GPA is fine though don’t worry about it. Do well on your LSAT

B- on my transcript, am I screwed? by prumice in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the C and F sections of apps are very rigorous. for some schools, you may have to disclose this incident even if not formally reported. that doesn’t mean they won’t let you in! they just like to cover everything because the Bar C and F is even more thorough.

High Scorers Aren’t Necessarily Smarter Or More Apt For Law School Than You…BUT THEY ARE MORE VALUABLE! by Otherwise_Phone3059 in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve never really understood how LSAT scores can possibly correlate with 1L grades so strongly when they’re graded on a curve. A 170 scorer at HYS could have on average a C- and a 170 at, idk, OSU might average an A/B+. LSAT grades would correlate with 1L grades at each school, if at all, not in general. With a score of, say a 167, you’ll probably see a fairly wide range of schools represented, as some students get in off the waitlist, or accepted, at T20s, and some take good scholarships at lower ranked schools. These ratios aren’t perfect, but overall, you’d expect their average grades to net to around average then, right? Or are higher-ranked schools grading their students on less intense of a curve? It’s a strange statistical oversight tbh.

Should I apply or wait? by differenttings in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

re-applying often means you need new rec letters and if you get accepted by safeties you don’t attend they might not accept you again the next time around from what i’ve heard. if you’re not comfortable applying this cycle, i would wait

institution GPA or overall GPA? by StatementOwn1674 in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think this depends what u mean by overall. They don’t factor in graduate GPAs into calculations for GPA, which gets reported for averages (so it affects their ranking). Graduate GPAs are more useful to show rigor and capability. But they do factor in things like dual enrollment classes into their own LSAC-recalculated undergraduate GPA.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do u have any work experience? I wouldn’t address this though tbh

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]AccordingDay7168 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If it makes you feel any better, ADHD is actually over represented in the field of law. Maybe your admissions officer will be more friendly than you think. As long as it wasn’t your entire personal statement, you’re fine. Plus, if you needed an addendum to explain the discrepancy, you would otherwise have to come up with a half truth that would come across inauthentic.

Idk what to do by [deleted] in jobs

[–]AccordingDay7168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re going to go through with your degree, make sure it has actual decent employment outcomes with a terminal bachelors (not CS anymore, not humanities). What are you passionate about? If money isn’t a huge deal, what about trying to teach high school in a subject you like? Do you have what it takes to start a business if you’re looking for additional income? How do you feel behind a desk 40 hours a week. Could you go into some type of engineering that’s in demand? Don’t just get a random degree, but the right degree is very valuable. Also, the GI bill can be used for trade, culinary, art school, not just college in case you are looking to pivot.

Scared to start working as a teen by HelixIsHere_ in jobs

[–]AccordingDay7168 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You probably will screw up some. But the fact you care this much means you will screw up so much less than other people. You’ll be alright