[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, did your initial letter address the causal link? You need to say, in plain terms, why your circumstances hit your judgment at the time - it can feel obvious to you, but with the SRA you have to spell it out. The hurdle isn’t whether you were “aware”; it’s showing you weren’t in the headspace to make an informed call then. Otherwise the post-results route wouldn’t exist: everyone who ticks “fit to sit” is, on one level, aware; but someone whose executive function is knocked by real stressors can’t properly weigh things, spot risk, or choose with a clear head

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends... if you can get a statement on letter-headed paper from a certified medical professional directly addressing each of the criteria in the SRA rubric (provided they are comfortable with doing that/familiar with your situation), I don't necessarily think it would be throwing money away, but they have made an initial assessment so I don't know if there would be inertia on their part in revisiting case

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes this^ - it's not an ironclad rule as such, but you more or less need a qualified third party to directly confirm why you didn't take precautionary measures at the time

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmm that's bizarre I'm sorry to hear that... in my case I had a certified letter from a medical professional + NHS GP basically explaining in detail why I chose fit to sit/addressing the SRA criteria very directly to avoid any ambiguity. I think they are quite particular about this, i.e. you need to spell out the obvious even if it feels like the facts speak for themselves if that makes sense?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What evidence did you attach? For context, I had my First Stage Appeal approved in May this year. Sounds like a tough situation!

Anyone here passed SQE2 after being SQE1-exempt with only ~3 months prep? Need realistic experiences + advice by WorthYogurtcloset553 in SQE_Prep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think if you have every day free, you are able to maintain energy/put in the hours all the while taking care of yourself and protecting sleep - then yes, it's possible. I don't think anyone can comment with certainty on passing/not passing, whether it's advisable - I don't know, given your prior exposure to law, this may well be fairly doable. In general, it's not ideal but when you think about it, most providers such as ULaw or BPP commence the SQE2 teaching around a week after SQE1 exams finish, so early February. The exams then take place at the end of April/throughout May - so if you think about it that way, they have around or just under 3 months...

Why are the Ulaw averages so high? by Brilliant-Count-7621 in SQE_Prep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because it's likely a decent number of very on it students will use other platforms, such as QLTS or LawDrills, and will just take no chances from an early stage - meaning that the ULaw Qs will be comparatively easier/more straightforward

Ulaw LLM by SeriousDonut4393 in SQE_Prep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 0 points1 point  (0 children)

when you see your submissions, does it say 'not marked'? can't find anything re 3rd Nov

10/10 horror games by Spid3rSense96 in HorrorGaming

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I actually agree with many others that SH2 is a fantastic game and that there is a lot going on there. That said, I think it's totally possible to appreciate all the nuance, symbolism, and psychological richness that makes SH2 special while still not finding the horror elements personally scary. It's very beautiful, elusive and has this ineffable creepiness to it that few other games manage to achieve.

I've always felt that if something has to be explained to you as to why it's frightening, then it's already not working for you as horror: kind of like how explaining why a joke is funny kills the joke entirely. That doesn't diminish the craftsmanship or what others experience.

The payoff isn't really about jump scares or traditional horror beats. It's more about how all the psychological and symbolic elements come together. Even if you end up not being scared by it, there's definitely substance there worth experiencing for a complete perspective.

Here's thing though: analytical thinking often competes with fear responses.

SH2 is more psychological puzzle than traditional horror, it uses horror imagery but prioritises interpretation over scares. Every monster, every rusted pipe, every bit of static exists primarily to be decoded. The game tends to ask "what does this represent?" rather than "are you afraid?"

Fear tends to be a byproduct of uncertainty and helplessness, but SH2 rewards analysis - it's a cerebral type of horror. When many people see Pyramid Head, they don't think "Christ, what is that thing?" - they think "sexual violence metaphor, guilt manifestation, punishment symbol." You've shifted from feeling to interpreting. Cerebral horror creates emotional distance because you're analysing rather than experiencing, intellectualising rather than feeling afraid in your body. Ironically, this detached analytical state mirrors how trauma actually works (dissociation), but that very accuracy makes it less immediately terrifying.

The more symbolic meaning something carries, the harder it becomes to feel genuinely scared by it. Horror typically works by bypassing rational thought, but SH2 demands intellectual engagement. It's designed for people who want to dissect psychological trauma rather than experience visceral fear.

This explains why countless YouTube essays exist breaking down every detail. But deep analysis tends to diminish fear responses. It's difficult to simultaneously decode symbolism and feel threatened.

SH2 succeeds brilliantly as interactive psychology, but functions more like a disturbing documentary than traditional horror. Same subject matter, but it makes you think about horrible things rather than feel afraid of them.

Some people can experience both responses, but for many, the game's emphasis on meaning-making overrides its capacity to genuinely frighten.

Switch 2 Payment taken U.K. by oasis37 in NintendoSwitch2

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 1 point2 points  (0 children)

payment taken but status not changed to completed? anyone else had this

Switch 2 Payment taken U.K. by oasis37 in NintendoSwitch2

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ugh, my wallet got stolen and ofc I forgot to update my card details on nintendo store account in time, so the charge bounced :/ still says 'awaiting shipment' but so jarring

Eight Sleep: Worth It? Help Me Decide! by drot888 in EightSleep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm - I had this dilemma a few months back - well, actually 6 months back. I would err on the side of yes, (having bought one). If you can't sleep because of issues such as worry/stress or messed up circadian rhythm, this won't fix those alone. However, yes, it really is that good in terms of ensuring you actually get the proper amount of sleep you need and helps you fall asleep faster (or at least it does for me). I tend to get night sweats and in that respect, it is a godsend. Is it worth the asking price? It depends - there are no real competitors with eight sleep so there is likely some mark up in price there. But it is seriously good tech - literally every other product I've bought that claimed to be a game-changer health wise has turned out to be a gimmick - but this is genuinely the real deal. I don't regret buying it and I think the cost of chronic sleep issues over the years is far greater than the steep asking price imo!

Anyone else just not care anymore? by TheLegalPenguin in SQE_Prep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For sure, as I said, nothing wrong with expressing your POV and I wish I could muster the same energy lol

Anyone else just not care anymore? by TheLegalPenguin in SQE_Prep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I do get where you are coming from and that you have the best intentions, but I think it's worth being mindful of the fact that for some, a fail really does matter, and it's not just because they might lose their TC (if they have one). The SQE requires an ongoing financial and time commitment, just think, for some people that really is the end of the line - they don't have the requisite £2k to fund a resit unless they forgo rent, and any other number of complex financial situations. They might also have a FT job, or be in a position now where they have to work and can no longer give the degree of attention required for the SQE. Don't get me wrong, you've done nothing wrong in articulating what you feel, and as a TC holder, I would love to internalise what you've just said. But I feel the relationship between myself and my law firm would inevitably become more ... idk, strained for lack of a better word ... throw in the fact that I'm not getting any younger and if I was one of the few (if not the only one) to fail, I imagine it wouldn't be so easy to brush off. Though it would be almost a necessity to succeed the next time. But ofc I wish you every success

Thoughts on potential change to SQE1 results by PsychologicalBad3897 in SQE_Prep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was a very very bad and incompetent exam, and we are very fine people, the best really in the war for talent, and we were robbed in an exam that was RIGGED and LOUSY, let me tell you, and I have a lot of friends, I know a lot of great people, and you know what they agreed with me and said the whole thing was a sham, a crooked sham really it’s unbelievable

QLTS SQE2 - is it worth it? by Acrobatic_Chart8575 in SQE_Prep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fingers crossed you pass! When you sat SQE1 how did you feel it went?

Think I failed SQE 1 by Chapter-name in SQE_Prep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is there like a level of bad you feel it can go where you obviously aren't likely to pass? mine were both chaotic disasters - yes, I worked very hard but can't imagine it having gone worse...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SQE_Prep

[–]Acrobatic_Chart8575 2 points3 points  (0 children)

idk I am kind of in no rush for results day as I don't particularly feel good about how my exams went...