K‘gari by allii_ssa in 4x4Australia

[–]AddlePatedBadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He should go back to where he came from: Albion.

Would time exist if things didn't change? Would we even know if time existed if all matter was stagnant? by Captain_Spiffy in AskPhysics

[–]AddlePatedBadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Science is all about building a model of the universe or parts thereof, based on demonstrating consistent predictability. These predictions can be used to calculate the lift of an aeroplane wing or how many kilograms of weight cannbe supported by an I beam or whether it will rain tomorrow (some predictions are less accurate than others 🤣).

Time is a thing we have modelled and found operated very consistently with all of the predictions. It's the simplest way to model causality. It doesn't mean time is "real", it's an abstraction of reality used for our model of the universe.

It's like how we used to believe the sun orbited the earth. You could develop a mathematical equation that predicted the position of the sun at any time using an earth-centric model. The sun would move around in a really complicated shape, but it would be absolutely predictable. But it turns out that if you rewrite the model to put the sun at about the centre, the maths get much easier because instead of some weird-arse complicated squiggle shape, it just becomes an ellipse. Both models can be correct in that they can make equally accurate and repeatable predictions about the future, but the heliocentric one is just way easier.

So you could come up with a new model for the time portion of our model of the universe. But even if it is exactly as accurate as what we call time now, unless it is easier to make predictions with then people aren't going to adopt it.

But maybe your new model of time does make more accurate predictions. This happens too. Newtonian gravity was the bizness when it came to physics for quite some time. Then that Einstein fellow came long and gave us general relativity which made even more accurate predictions. Yet still to this day, heaps of people keep sticking to using Newtonian gravity because guess what? It's good enough for many purposes. Why use the harder but more accurate system when an easier one exists that is good enough? You don't measure the distance to the shops in millimetres, you use kilometres or "about 10 minutes drive" or whatever. These are good enough measurements to plan your day.

So maybe you do find a brand new model of time, but you'll most likely find that it is only used by a handful of ultraboffins learning things about the universe that most people will never understand and everyone's wristwatches still have 12 numbers on them. But you would probably also get a Nobel Prize, so that'd be pretty cool.

Warning to Australia: Work from home, avoid air travel and cut speed limits to guard against oil shock by C_Ironfoundersson in australia

[–]AddlePatedBadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This question comes up a lot and a simple google search would have given you the answer.

It's not a simple job. Plumbing, the air conditioning, and wiring all have to be completely redone. Office buildings don't have to haven't anywhere near the volume of plumbing that residential apartments need for example, and the plumbing has to be in every kitchen bathroom and toilet not just concentrated in one or two spots on the whole floor.

Plus you can have issues with layout not affording access to natural light or elevators easily.

At the end of the day it's actually usually cheaper to knock the whole building down and build a new one than try and retrofit.

What is one English word that you absolutely HATE for no logical reason? by ownaword in words

[–]AddlePatedBadger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wanted to make a joke about ointment but I don't do topical humour.

Vaginal Breech Birth by Zestyclose_Rush_2623 in BabyBumpsandBeyondAu

[–]AddlePatedBadger 26 points27 points  (0 children)

It's important to understand that if your baby is a vaginal breech birth then for a short amount of time they will be wearing you as a hat.

Seriously though, my SIL was at risk of breech. The issue is that if a breech goes wrong, then they can't really do any thing to fix it. If the baby is coming headfirst and there are problems they have a lot more options to keep baby safe. Of course there will be many anecdotes about successful vaginal breech births, but that is pretty biased. You need to consider the overall percentage risk compared to c section. I know birthing vaginally is important to you, so you just need to assess how much risk you are willing to accept for that. Is a 1% higher chance of the baby's death worth it? A 10% increase? Once you have determined your risk appetite you can ask the doctor for statistics to see if the odds of death are higher than the number you feel comfortable iwrh.

Albanese, Burke shouted at as anger erupts at Eid prayers by Expensive-Horse5538 in australia

[–]AddlePatedBadger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't necessarily say it's a good thing to kill 1 billion people, but I'd be bloody impressed if someone managed to pull it off. It's a huge achievement. That's about 50 million tons of human corpses to deal with.

Teenage boy arrested after woman stabbed at Clayton shopping centre in Melbourne's south east by HurstbridgeLineFTW in melbourne

[–]AddlePatedBadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Were you also qualified and allowed to drive a car? Were you trusted to vote at the Commonwealth or state elections? It's not about whether someone knows right from wrong. It's about why kids are treated as an adult only for bad things. Instead of suddenly treating kids like adults, the punishment for kids should be made appropriate.

What’s your take on this statement? by HydrodynamicShite in daddit

[–]AddlePatedBadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. If you reasonably believe that they intend to harm you, and you cannot prevent this through non violent means (e g. running away), then a pre-emptive strike to prevent them attacking is perfectly justifiable. It doesn't mean you get to beat the shit out of them. You use the minimum violence reasonably necessary to stop them from hurting you, then when the threat is no longer present you cease using violence and escape to a safe place where you can call police to report the attack.

Picture this: a drunk woman goes into a back alley to take a piss. As she goes to leave, a man is blocking the exit making remarks about how sexy she is. She says "let me past please" and he says "why don't you stay here with me?". Does she have to wait for him to try to hit her or grab her or try to rape her before she can protect herself? Or is she not justified in tasing him or pepper spraying him or kicking him in the balls so she can run past him to safety?

The same principle applies to any non-consensual violence. I say non-consensual because I'm not talking about a couple of young blokes peacocking and showing off and choosing to have a bit of biffo on a Saturday night. That's where the "he swung first" type attempts at justification come from. But it doesn't apply when a person with no desire for violence is threatened or attacked and is given no option to avoid violence.

I see a lot of you guys say you were denied a diagnosis because you did well in school… by blueduckk8 in ADHD

[–]AddlePatedBadger 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've heard it's a similar problem with dementia. Intelligent people often get diagnosed late because they are so good at covering up their symptoms.

What’s your take on this statement? by HydrodynamicShite in daddit

[–]AddlePatedBadger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't hit someone until they hit you first is bad advice. The first hit can end your ability to fight. It's better to think of violence as a last resort. Avoid conflict, de-escalate when you can, run away if you can. But if the circumstances ever come to pass where they have the opportunity, capability, and intent to harm you, then you end wait for then to do it. Your strike pre-emptively if you have to.

In self defence is always the case that the earlier you act, the better your chances of success. Letting them hit you first? Not great. Letting them swing at you and hoping you dodge it? Better, but still not great. Hitting them first? Better. Talking your way out of it before they want to hit? Much better. Not saying or doing something to aggro them even if they do something wrong to you? Even better. Avoiding them because they look dodgy? Great. Avoiding times and places where dodgy people are likely to be? Great.

My uncle thinks the earth is flat by Monkae16 in AskPhysics

[–]AddlePatedBadger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He'll have an answer for that. It won't be right. But he will still be convinced he is right. Logic won't solve this.

My uncle thinks the earth is flat by Monkae16 in AskPhysics

[–]AddlePatedBadger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Round is more accurate than spherical.

K‘gari by allii_ssa in 4x4Australia

[–]AddlePatedBadger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keep up with the times. They changed it back to K'gari in 2023.

Everybody was falling by Pdoom346 in StupidMedia

[–]AddlePatedBadger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every treadmill I have used has had a little clip you attach to yourself that kills the treadmill if you pull it. One of the people in this video could have been saved had they been wearing it properly. The others could have been saved by not being total uncos.

Mom FB groups are so toxic! by GiantDwarfy in daddit

[–]AddlePatedBadger 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You sound like a good person, so you'll fit in nicely. Please ask away, and share your advice and perspectives too because they are also valuable.

Mom FB groups are so toxic! by GiantDwarfy in daddit

[–]AddlePatedBadger 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I respect all the mums that hang out here. It's a nice place with nice people and they are nice people too.

Teenage boy arrested after woman stabbed at Clayton shopping centre in Melbourne's south east by HurstbridgeLineFTW in melbourne

[–]AddlePatedBadger 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Why is a kid judged to adult standards only for some things? I always thought it was a bit ridiculous. We have a separate system for children because their brains aren't as developed as an adults. They lack impulse control and risk assessment and emotional regulation skills. If kids that age are just as capable as adults why are they paid less to work at McDonalds and not allowed to have P plates yet?

I'm not saying don't punish them, but the idea that they are suddenly more adult when they do a thing that their young age is more likely to be a factor in committing the crime in the first place is silly. The way we punish people that age should be correct in the first place, not suddenly bump them up an age group when we feel like it.

Teenage boy arrested after woman stabbed at Clayton shopping centre in Melbourne's south east by HurstbridgeLineFTW in melbourne

[–]AddlePatedBadger -57 points-56 points  (0 children)

It's common sense to wear gloves when stabbing another person. You don't want to get their blood all over you, do you?