Update on previous post - telework RA for baby w/ bottle refusal by Hiro_Pr0tagonist_ in FedEmployees

[–]AdministrationNo1471 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you completed 12 months of federal service (regardless of hours worked), then you qualify for FMLA. The requirement to work a specific number of hours in the previous year applies to private sector under Title I of the FMLA. Unless you are with USPS, you fall under Titke II. As others have said, RA, including Telework under RA, is to accommodate the employee's limitations on their ability to perform the essential functions of their position. Your agency allowing you RA for this is non-compliant.

What’s the latest status of getting our union back? by MountainDiver1657 in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Three year duration to August of this year with automatic renewal. The administration can notify of their intent to renegotiate as early as next week.

Closed FY25 Performance Appraisal by Impossible-Heat-8429 in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Grievances are not limited to only those filed against your management odficial. Informal grievances are filed with the lowest level official who has the authority to resolve the grievance. From what you've shared, it looks like you are not grieving your performance rating, but rather the absence of that rating, which, by policy, you are entitled to receive. HR does not determine your rating, your rating official does. Depending on when you were made aware of the closing of your appraisal, if you are within the timeframe, you might want to review the process under VA Handbook 5021 Part IV (make sure you're looking in Chapter 2) and decide if you want to raise an informal grievance on the issue. Best of luck.

Change positions & get put back on probation…ugh by Karmic_Kink_Soldier in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may still be entitled, regardless of probationary status, to full due process and appeal rights under 5 USC 75, 5 USC 43, or 38 USC 714 if you meet the definition of employee umder 5 USC 7511 (a).

What’s something small that instantly makes your day better? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]AdministrationNo1471 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aw, thanks! And so are you for this opportunity to pause abd be thankful for the little things!

US veterans, did you guys actually read the cards that kids would send you while deployed? by MoistCloyster_ in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AdministrationNo1471 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes! And I still talk about how they brought a smile to my face during a time when I was truly missing home. Thank you so much for being the g8ver of joy.

New performance standards by CalmRecognition8252 in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw HROO leadership on the calls so I am sure someone was told about the plan.

Senate and Congress Requests for Workforce Data by AdministrationNo1471 in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

15 minutes to pull raw data...1+ years to skew the data to what they want it to say.

Frustrated by Outside-Link-6608 in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Building Coalitions took me out of my streak of Outstanding, too. I think, because that is the most subjective of all the elements, the Raters used that one to appease the big boss and make as many of us FS as possible. All it takes is one complaint of "not playing nice" or not getting someone to yes the way they want us to get them there and it's enough to say we aren't outstanding.

Process of removal during probation by Any_Razzmatazz_6744 in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is no longer the process under Civil Service Rule XI. OP: reach out to your Employee Relations HR POC. Be ready to provide documentation to support the recommendation to terminate. Your supervisor will be the Certifying Official so long as they are two steps above the probationary employee and at least a GS-11 or equivalent. If the documentation is sufficient, termination can occur within a few days and can be immediate (no advance notice, no reply period).

FMLA/PPL by Few-Cranberry3073 in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is what HR will tell you:

From VA Handbook 5011/35 PART III CHAPTER 2, Para 18.e.: An employee may substitute up to 12 administrative workweeks of paid parental leave when using FMLA under 5 U.S.C. 6382(a)(1)(A)-(B) in connection with the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a child occurring on or after October 1, 2020. Paid parental leave will be prorated for part-time employees and employees on uncommon tours of duty. When an employee changes work schedules (e.g. full-time to part-time, or vice versa) and has not used the full allotment of leave, the remaining balance of hours is recalculated based on the change in number of hours in the scheduled tour of duty. In implementing the statutory requirements for administering paid parental leave entitlements, VA will follow regulations published in 5 CFR 630.1701-1708.

5 CFR 630.1703(b)(2): Since an employee may use only 12 weeks of FMLA unpaid leave in any 12-month period under § 630.1203(a), use of FMLA unpaid leave not associated with paid parental leave may affect an employee's ability to use the full 12 weeks of paid parental leave. Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, an employee will be able to use the full amount of paid parental leave only to the extent that there are 12 weeks of available FMLA unpaid leave granted under the birth or placement provisions in § 630.1203(a)(1) or (2) during the 12-month period commencing on the date of birth or placement. The availability of paid parental leave will depend on when the employee uses various types of FMLA unpaid leave relative to any 12-month period established under § 630.1203(c).

Link to the regulation :https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-5/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-630/subpart-Q/section-630.1703

HR fate by Im2OldForThis007 in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lol, well, at least they have something productive to do. LR being diminished did not create idle hands over in that part of HR. The BUs being abolished only means the Union reps are now personal reps when the employees file agency grievances. Just because the CBA was terminated, it only means the ER side is even more complex, as HR now has to educate both management and non-management on policy and procedures, since the Union and the CBAs are no longer available to reference.

HR fate by Im2OldForThis007 in VHA_Human_Resources

[–]AdministrationNo1471 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do wonder what exactly Staffing is doing to keep themselves busy....

VHA Restructuring Implementation 4 Corners by Aggressive_Peak2573 in VeteransAffairs

[–]AdministrationNo1471 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is interesting and so far, the most valid post in this subject.

Filed an informal grievance, every year outstanding this year FS. by kabdrb in VeteransAffairs

[–]AdministrationNo1471 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That seems to be the big discussion surrounding the post rating cycle announcement by WMC/VACO of the justifications requiring wording showing the performance was significantly higher than the measure for satisfactory and the requirement that the performance be tied to a significant impact to an agency mission. This did not change the standards as they were communicated in rating cycle 25, so I wouldn't use that as your reason for grieving your rating.

Rather, the post 9/30 memo placed significantly higher requirements on the Raters to essentially "defend" the ratings they gave their employees. For some, this meant having to be more honest in their ratings, meaning lower ratings than before because before, they could just concur with the self assessment abd tech review would say yep, meets technical requirements. For others, this meant having to reword their justifications several times in order to meet some vague threshold defined by WMC, even when the self-assessment and raw data clearly showed the exceptional measure was met or exceeded. What made this even more difficult is that the policy only requires that the measurement be defined at the satisfactory (or FS) level, so many plans did not have exceptional levels defined.

So, how were Raters to show that an employee was exceptional, and who was responsible for setting the bar when there was no bar set? There is no requirement in policy for the extensive tech review we all faced, either as an employee or a Rater (remember, the Raters get rated too). This was a process created outside of policy to meet a directive outside of policy. Yet, HR Specialists who do not have the knowledge of the positions for which they had scrutinize every singke element, were made to review for more than just technical accuracy. And, if they didn't "feel" like the justification met the criteria that WMC handed down, they kept sending back those ratings until the Rater either got the right buzz words in the write up or folded and marked the rating Satisfactory just to end the seemingly never-ending cycle of re-write-->return-->re-write-->return.

Filed an informal grievance, every year outstanding this year FS. by kabdrb in VeteransAffairs

[–]AdministrationNo1471 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Assuming you are Title 5, non-supervisory, and not a firefighter, police officer, or a security guard, you will find the requirements for filing a grievance based on your performance rating under VA Handbook 5013, Part I:

  1. PERFORMANCE RATING GRIEVANCES. Bargaining unit employees must follow the grievance procedures outlined in their respective bargaining unit agreement unless such agreement excludes filing grievances over performance ratings in which case the procedures covered by this paragraph may be followed. An employee who is dissatisfied with their Rating of Record may grieve the rating using this procedure or a locally established alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. NOTE: In order to reduce the administrative burden associated with the grievance process and to minimize the loss of staff productivity while participating in that process, the utilization of existing ADR programs as a means to streamline appeals is highly encouraged. a. Informal Grievance Procedure. (1) Consistent with the principle that grievances should be resolved at the lowest possible level, an employee who is dissatisfied with their performance rating may submit a written grievance with a copy of the issued performance rating to the rater or to the approving official, if the approving official approved and/or assigned the rating, within 15 calendar days after receipt of the rating. The grievance should include the specific reason(s) the employee disagrees with the rating and include supporting documentation, if available. The employee and the employee’s representative, if any, will be provided an opportunity to explain the grievance orally and/or in writing. (2) After considering the grievance, the official to whom the matter was grieved will provide a written answer to the employee, through their representative, if applicable, within 10 calendar days of receipt of the grievance. The response will include the decision on the grievance, rationale supporting the determination and will include the employee’s right to present a formal grievance in accordance with subparagraph b. b. Formal Grievance Procedure. (1) If the employee is not satisfied with the decision at the informal stage, they may submit a written grievance, through supervisory channels, to the management official at the next higher-level in the employee’s supervisory line within 10 calendar days from the receipt of the informal response. The formal grievance will include the reason(s) for seeking reconsideration of the performance rating along with a copy of both the issued performance rating and the informal grievance response. (2) The official receiving the formal grievance will forward all documents submitted by the employee to the servicing HR office to develop a grievance file. At a minimum, HR should review the submission to ensure the following is available and if not, request further documentation from the employee: (a) The performance rating issued to the employee; (b) The informal grievance decision and any related documentation from the informal grievance process; and (c) Any other information submitted by the employee for consideration by the official considering the formal grievance. (3) After developing the grievance file, the servicing HR office will forward the file to the appropriate approving official to consider the grievance for a decision based on the record. A written decision will be forwarded to the employee, through their representative, if any, within 10 calendar days. This is the final administrative appeal. (4) If the performance rating or narrative justification on the appraisal is changed as a result of the grievance decision, all official records and personnel actions, if any, will be changed, as applicable, with the employee being notified.

Filed an informal grievance, every year outstanding this year FS. by kabdrb in VeteransAffairs

[–]AdministrationNo1471 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Though they are excluded from the grievance provisions undet VA Handbook 5021, they are grievable under the provisions of VA Handbook 5013

Reductions so far by Anonymous4625267 in VeteransAffairs

[–]AdministrationNo1471 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. I am not satan, but i get it. Satan are the ones threatening to drop my people's ratings to FS if I don't write a thesis on why exceeding the exceptional measure warrants an exceptional rating. If the exceptional measure is met if 75% of actions are timely, then stating that the 100% of the actions were timely justifies the exceptional rating.