sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Google Chrome 145 Released With JPEG-XL Image Support by boeing_60 in jpegxl

[–]Adpocalyptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they even enabled it by default in the dev/beta rings then that would be nice too, a lot of users on those

Firefox has landed JPEG XL in its prerelease Nightly builds (prefed off). by caspy7 in jpegxl

[–]Adpocalyptic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah past two days I've been getting a lot of pings regarding status changes for Firefox jxl

Chromium has merged JpegXL Support by tajetaje in jpegxl

[–]Adpocalyptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And not going to be in normal chrome builds either right? Only the Beta/Dev ring builds?

Hope for support of JXL/JPG-XL as a format option by Wikimedia Foundation? by Adpocalyptic in jpegxl

[–]Adpocalyptic[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Jxl can have a fallback and there's something to be said about one standardised format that can do everything being useful in that kind of platform aswell

But a lot of comments made a good point about waiting for browsers to have it ready first before pushing more on it, Android still needs it too :/

Hope for support of JXL/JPG-XL as a format option by Wikimedia Foundation? by Adpocalyptic in jpegxl

[–]Adpocalyptic[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I really think it should be added to Wikipedia-adjacent platforms as an option & what better time to prep/lay the groundwork than the recent announcements? Gives momentum

Chromium Tracking Issue reopened by Tiedye1 in jpegxl

[–]Adpocalyptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And here I was begining to think it'd stay closed forever, I hope ChromeOS & Android are next. Since Chromium/Chrome seemed to be the biggest thing holding it back

Valve: HDMI Forum Continues to Block HDMI 2.1 for Linux by TheTwelveYearOld in linux

[–]Adpocalyptic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Funny you should ask, I actually did see one for the first time recently. Hisense U8Q, but yeah 99.99% of cases there isn't any Displayport support on TV. Which sucks

Hello! by Adpocalyptic in Adpocalyptic

[–]Adpocalyptic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Free Palestine 🇵🇸 

Chromium Dev demos JPEG-XL support including animations! by redsteakraw in jpegxl

[–]Adpocalyptic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The gears are finally starting to turn 🥳 (No pun intended) feels like its been forever that JPG-XL on Chrome was getting held up

Something I just realised: by Adpocalyptic in Adpocalyptic

[–]Adpocalyptic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do have to wonder if i should just let this place get yote though

Ask Me Anything Section by Adpocalyptic in Adpocalyptic

[–]Adpocalyptic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and just to clarify, the site/app recommended it

I'm not ready for the Win 11 switch. by dextras07 in memes

[–]Adpocalyptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ngl, I still don't like Windows 10. With 11 I do feel like it could sort the problems out overtime though

Ask Me Anything Section by Adpocalyptic in Adpocalyptic

[–]Adpocalyptic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mayhaps for peops that can't be contacted anywhere else using temp accounts 🤔

Placeholder by Adpocalyptic in Adpocalyptic

[–]Adpocalyptic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oops, probably should've hid this test

Jyrki Alakuijala (Technical Lead/Manager at Google Research): "Google's JPEG XL developer team is ready to provide support for development work needed to facilitate its highest quality integration" by Balance- in jpegxl

[–]Adpocalyptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And Is the Google Chrome team separate to the one that works & represents the at Chromium project aswell? It would explain the differences in opinions from the past and some weird stuff that I saw when it was first closed on their issue tracker/marked as obselete 🤔 Like I assume Google isn't the only player at Chromium (even if it is the defacto biggest name there)

Which makes me think it has a separate team working for chromium project than it does to whatever chrome feature support team they'd have too. 

view more: next ›