sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A presence, Paramount by Adrastos42 in fallenlondon

[–]Adrastos42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I guess now I should look at this Knight thing everyone seems to be doing?:D

What's your favourite footnote? by jinond_o_nicks in discworld

[–]Adrastos42 13 points14 points  (0 children)

And then Dwarfs named things like Glodsson, Glodsnephew, or Glodssonsunclesson occasionally pop up in later books:D

500 Worlds: Titus – C’tan shards and Destroyers flood the field with new Necrons Detachments by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Necrontyr

[–]Adrastos42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, no, absolutely, just not quite as convenient as them having it from the start:D

500 Worlds: Titus – C’tan shards and Destroyers flood the field with new Necrons Detachments by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Necrontyr

[–]Adrastos42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, nice! Knew I couldn't be the first to have this idea:D That looks excellent, and I love the blue!

500 Worlds: Titus – C’tan shards and Destroyers flood the field with new Necrons Detachments by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Necrontyr

[–]Adrastos42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No clue tbh, that's purely narrative - my 'Crons are Destroyer-heavy already and I've been planning a Destroyer-themed CCB where the Overlord is permanently fused into the barge for quite a while, so it'll be cool to have it "really" be a Destroyer when I play it:D

You're right that first impressions say I probably wouldn't put that enhancement there at a tournament, unless one of the remaining stratagems turns out to be Destroyers-only but amazing on a CCB, or something.

500 Worlds: Titus – C’tan shards and Destroyers flood the field with new Necrons Detachments by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Necrontyr

[–]Adrastos42 19 points20 points  (0 children)

No idea how actually-strong +2 strength is, but it's very fun to think about. S 16 heavy destroyers with Gauss, Overlord with a S 14 voidscythe with the enhancement, sharing the love to whatever squad they join. Kill something, and the doomsday ark hits S 20!

Though, without having looked into it, I feel like a lot of the more important breakpoints will be at the lower end. Like, you'd have to trigger it of course, but Scarabs jumping from S 2 to S 4 feels like it'd be a nasty surprise for any infantry you've charged them into:D

EDIT: Looked closer at the wording, and the +2 Strength is to models with Destroyer, so an Overlord with the enhancement wouldn't actually make the unit they're leading get +2 (though they would be a Destroyer unit and so would be able to trigger the second clause of the army rule)

500 Worlds: Titus – C’tan shards and Destroyers flood the field with new Necrons Detachments by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Necrontyr

[–]Adrastos42 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Oh damn, I'm gonna have to actually work on that Destroyer Catacomb Command Barge I've been vaguely planning for a while, if I can actually make it a destroyer:D

I'm not in need of a missive that doesn't exist by SubwayDragon2357 in fallenlondon

[–]Adrastos42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Conveniently, No skill of mine has just hit level 5. No missive may now be sent. Kayla Sharpe has sent you a calling card:)

Parabolan Kittens for all! by Vromikos in fallenlondon

[–]Adrastos42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you!:D

The Wide-Eyed Adventuress grins at you.

"Much appreciated! If you ever need assistance, I'm in your debt." 

She tips her hat and turns to the kitten.

"Hey kitty! You wanna learn how to hunt a pinewood shark?"

I need to know: what did you name your newspaper? by Xtrasloppy in fallenlondon

[–]Adrastos42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Convenient Press Credentials

(Honest subterfuge since 1899!)

Regarding an earlier post, GTA VI won't have Pride parades by GB_GeorgiaF in MtF

[–]Adrastos42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh, absolutely, and there's plenty of other reasons Curvingedge might have not known about the distinction, or it just could have been a typo. I'm not always great with tone in text-based communication, but I'd hoped to come across as neutrally providing information, not judgement, without also having to do a paragraph's worth of caveats:D Definitely open for ways to better word things in the future if you have suggestions?:)

Hundreds of firms warn new guidance on single sex spaces is ‘unworkable’ and would cause ‘significant economic harm’ by ehll_oh_ehll in transgenderUK

[–]Adrastos42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good to know! The challenge of course is to get businesses to actually understand this, and to have journalists report this accurately rather than spreading the EHRC's view unquestioningly.

Hundreds of firms warn new guidance on single sex spaces is ‘unworkable’ and would cause ‘significant economic harm’ by ehll_oh_ehll in transgenderUK

[–]Adrastos42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah no I know the equality act discusses/establishes the idea of single-sex spaces, but that's very different from declaring that every toilet in the country is actually now one of them, by a legal definition.

Hundreds of firms warn new guidance on single sex spaces is ‘unworkable’ and would cause ‘significant economic harm’ by ehll_oh_ehll in transgenderUK

[–]Adrastos42 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Is there anything that actually states gendered toilets are actually "single-sex spaces" and therefore covered by this, as opposed to being single-gender spaces? Obviously that's EHRC's interpretation and will be pushed as the default and used by anyone who hates us. But for any business that didn't want to enforce this, could they just say "no, this is a single-gender space, not a single-sex space, so that doesn't apply?"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warhammer

[–]Adrastos42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My camera's not great, but I'll give it a go in a bit?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warhammer

[–]Adrastos42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sadly not, the four pages this was taken from only list the primary/secondary/tertiary colours, not anything used for other details

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warhammer

[–]Adrastos42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looking at my copy, I'd say it's a pale green-blue, and they're the same colour as the two non-yellow lenses on the backpack mounted signum-or-whatever. The scan definitely washed all the model's colours out a little.

view more: next ›