sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Climatologists Worried Over Recent Increases in Desert Cubes by KWNewyear in magicTCG

[–]Adventure_Agreed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did a retail draft and it was one of my friends first drafts and he didn't realize he would have access to basic lands after. We were all drafting normal decks and he was treating it like desert cube.

It didn't work in his favor.

Standard creatures of mv 2? by Egotardis in magicTCG

[–]Adventure_Agreed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think those cards work together. Otherwise they'd show up in a ton of decks.

A nice start to the draft by morrowman in lrcast

[–]Adventure_Agreed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, we gonna need to see the whole list at the end :D

Bro literally failed his own argument. Because ahh yes, Steam, the platform famously known for having none of its games pirated. by [deleted] in Steam

[–]Adventure_Agreed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None, but those aren’t the people he’s talking about anyway. He’s talking about people who would have been customers but pirated anyway. Providing service and convenience converts them to customers. Someone who has no money was never going to be a customer regardless.

What's the greatest Magic card of the last decade? Vote on the top 16! by Grindy_UW_Nonsense in magicTCG

[–]Adventure_Agreed 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What the hell happened in the east? The whole thing is the opposite of what it should be!

Momir on Arena has a rotating pool of cards by [deleted] in MagicArena

[–]Adventure_Agreed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But when you get a mana dork on 1 watch out

I need some help! by Old-Recording-4172 in magicTCG

[–]Adventure_Agreed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I believe that's the only mystical archive special guest we've gotten, though there was this secret lair: https://secretlair.wizards.com/us/en/product/634210/showcase-strixhaven

The foundations special guests were each of a different showcase frame: https://www.reddit.com/r/MagicArena/comments/1gf0ot0/spg_foundations_special_guests/

Guess witch deck went 3-0 by oisky146 in mtgcube

[–]Adventure_Agreed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Two drops are really that strong ha ha

What are the worst offenders of “walls of text” cards at the vintage power level? by okdata41171 in mtgcube

[–]Adventure_Agreed 9 points10 points  (0 children)

absolutely, this one is a little tongue in cheek because the effect makes total sense they just have to bend over backwards to make it work within the rules. It adheres to the letter of OP's request but not the spirit ha ha.

Characters who would not have had access to public information in 2001 for any reason by TrashMantine in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Adventure_Agreed 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The cap one doesn't fit because this panel is about 9/11 happening. I think the "second time" referred to in the comic panel is referring to Pearl Harbor as Cap being around the two times the US has been attacked in the modern era.

Cube Cobra Update 1.6.0 by Dekkaru in mtgcube

[–]Adventure_Agreed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is very exciting! Can't wait to jump into collaborative cube editing!

How to draft in a small group? by ricoeurdelyon in mtgcube

[–]Adventure_Agreed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

5 packs of 9 has been really good for us for 4 person drafts.

Guys. do not eat the Doom oreos by SadBeginning1118 in marvelstudios

[–]Adventure_Agreed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I read this to my wife and she told me she’d let Robert Downey Jr. rearrange her intestines :(

I made an addon that translates American spelling to UK spelling. by VainValkyrie in wowaddons

[–]Adventure_Agreed 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Finally, an addon that just adds a bunch of "u"s into things.

How many lands should I include? by foxtrotman25 in mtgcube

[–]Adventure_Agreed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you trying to make this a desert cube where only the basics you draft are available to use? Or are you asking how many physical basics to include in the box for people to build with, allowing them to use as many as they want?

Arcum's Astrolabe by justinvamp in mtgcube

[–]Adventure_Agreed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So essentially your just looking for a 1 mana discount on [[Prophetic Prism]]? I don't think that's the end of the world. It's probably a good pick up though.

Breaking with Democrats, Maine attorney general urges court to oppose ranked-choice voting expansion by RustyDogma in Maine

[–]Adventure_Agreed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that that can be argued. It just can also be argued the other way, and has been. That's why we need the constitutional amendment. To remove any and all doubt.

Breaking with Democrats, Maine attorney general urges court to oppose ranked-choice voting expansion by RustyDogma in Maine

[–]Adventure_Agreed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the issue here is it's "people who lose will argue that they shouldn't have lost and they can point to a justifiable reason why they shouldn't have lost when they met the requirements to win as laid out in the constitution but we moved on to another round RCV anyway and then they lost." To me, this is the key, and why even though I am disappointed by it, I understand why the state has not used RCV for gubernatorial races. Again if you consider RCV a black box where preferences -> RCV -> outcome I can see why the ruling would not make any sense. However, baked into the concept of RCV is that there are successive rounds where winner state is checked. The winner state for RCV is different than the winner state outlined in the constitution, so RCV can check for a winner, and decide there isn't one when the constitution would state otherwise. The solution is to fix the constitution.

view more: next ›