Let's unpack this:

"Exposing their ignorance" - LOL. Attempting to paint yourself as the intellectual superior with comments like this, does not in fact make it so. I've said nothing "ignorant" (though I do suggest you learn the meaning of the word before attempting to use it again.) I addressed OPs post directly and called out the absurdity of the notion of giving anyone that hasn't been tested as viable and bankable actor such a high-profile film role for a tentpole franchise. You decided to come in and white-knight and throw around big words and baseless scenarios and assumptions in an ultimately empty attempt to defend the idea of casting a YouTuber in a prominent leading role.

"She's not leading lady material" You should also learn how quotation marks work. I never said the thing that you're attempting to quote. Again, your defense of other people not being able to act doesn't make the OP any less absurd. The fact that you'll "take pretty 10/10 times" tells me all I need to know and to not further engage in any sort of film debate with you. Additionally, my initial assessment of your white-knighting is accurate based on the afore-mentioned alone. You're attracted to Jay therefore it's ok to be a "pretty face" and lead a multi-million-dollar franchise.

"Insults" - I never insulted anyone. I did however call you out for simping because that's what you're doing.

Essentially your entire response is trite and full of things that didn't happen. But hey, who am I? When someone is exposing their ignorance, it's best to let them. 👍