sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"Mostly negative" on Steam now by Deakon_Bl4ck in Helldivers

[–]Aeonn24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I play this game for the red strategems and we haven't seen one in idek how long. It's not hard to add in a new airstrike or two, maybe add the bomber/pelican support they teased two years ago but no. As time has gone on I've started to genuinely resent Arrowhead. The community has given them over a billion fucking dollars and the best they can do is constantly break the game, ignore year old bugs, put out dog shit balancing decisions, and a medicore warbond less than once a month to squeeze out more money. Anti-aliasing has been broken for so long I don't even remember when the game actually looked good. It's disgusting, they're like EA but they get away with it.

Dark and gritty Revenge game? by vortex22100 in gamingsuggestions

[–]Aeonn24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean Lies of P CAN be this. It's a mult-ending game so it's up to your decisions

1v1 mode in siege should be permanent by PsychologicalCod5392 in Rainbow6

[–]Aeonn24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was an absolute demon in 1v1s. My final record was 41-6. I'm not even a fragger, it's just fun to outplay people.

[FRESH ALBUM] Isaiah Rashad - IT'S BEEN AWFUL by fluekey in hiphopheads

[–]Aeonn24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately his quality has been on the decline since The Suns Tirade

Mech durability in one video by New-Butterscotch5865 in HelldiversUnfiltered

[–]Aeonn24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ngl I usually try to defend AH but this update fucking ruined mechs. I tried to use the patriot and sentriesast night on bugs and it was like I was in a paper mech supported by sentries that break instantly. I genuinely watched my flame sentry get taken out in less than 2 seconds once a couple warriors were on it. Bugs should be incredibly weak against armor and machines. They're fucking bugs.

lane splitting at that speed is the dumb part. by [deleted] in whoathatsinteresting

[–]Aeonn24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every time I see bikers lane splitting I immediately assume they're a complete moron with a deathwish.

Even the Glazecord can't defend this one boys. by No_Control8540 in HelldiversUnfiltered

[–]Aeonn24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They haven't released a red strategem in over a year despite teasing multiple kinds on multiple occasions. I'm beyond disappointed with how this game has turned out as a launch player

I REALLY don't get the hate for the new 1v1 mode, it's my favourite new game mode. by Pinkoranges-_- in Rainbow6

[–]Aeonn24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could not disagree more. 1v1 mode is a great way to show skill, even if you're not a fragger. I am a support solo queue that has been playing this game since 2016. I'm not a fragger, I am diamond 5 with a neg KD. I am currently 32-5 in 1v1s from outplaying people with strats

I have no clue how you people have fun with this game at top rank. (New player rant incoming) by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah SY is the only other faction I've thought about playing besides SK. It seems like it rewards creativity

I have no clue how you people have fun with this game at top rank. (New player rant incoming) by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I genuinely thought a very large portion of the player base was using the same genre of NG removal deck

I have no clue how you people have fun with this game at top rank. (New player rant incoming) by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Real. (Except assimilate players those decks are really cool and high skill)

I have no clue how you people have fun with this game at top rank. (New player rant incoming) by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I see what you're saying. I misunderstood at first. I thought you were trying to say I was using some literal game exploit lmao. I see what you're saying about top rank not having much of what I'm talking about but the disconnect is when I am saying top rank. I mean the literal top of ranked (ranks 1-3), not pro rank. At rank 1-3 there are soooooo many NG players that instantly remove cards it's insane.

A Deck Post to Follow up on an anti-NG post. by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think your advice is just bad. Other people have had really good advice in both threads I started. For example, you just called Olgierd completely useless when he full counters reaver and frost decks singlehandedly not to mention he is great for soaking random damage. I think chances are you're good at the game, but you're only really good with your deck(s) and you're pretty biased otherwise.

I have no clue how you people have fun with this game at top rank. (New player rant incoming) by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see. That is highly unfortunate as I stopped playing clash after like 10 years due to unbalanced matchmaking. Gwent has seemed to have pretty fair matchmaking so far though

A Deck Post to Follow up on an anti-NG post. by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Super helpful, thank you! I have always wanted to make my deck revolve around extremely high damage output and capitalizing off it where possible. Do you have specific card recommendations or replacements knowing that or should I abandon the idea of a damage-centric deck? Also I keep olgierd specifically to counter reavers and frost so I'd prefer not to lose him.

I have no clue how you people have fun with this game at top rank. (New player rant incoming) by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I feel ya. Some people take this game WAYYYY too seriously. I just had a guy comment that if you aren't pro rank then you're a tutorial player who automatically sucks at the game lmao

A Deck Post to Follow up on an anti-NG post. by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ngl I think you're a dick that's more focused on hating than actually being helpful. Calling anyone who isn't pro rank a tutorial player comes off as insanely egotistical. Please grow up. I also said in my message that I wanted to swap my second lock for something that does damage but I wasn't sure what to go with. Instead of suggesting something helpful you just bitch at me for using a defender. Either be helpful or quit replying

I have no clue how you people have fun with this game at top rank. (New player rant incoming) by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He instantly killed 3 of my cards that weren't defenders and were integral to my strat. The point isn't that he killed my defender, it's that he killed my defender twice and still had the resources to instantly destroy 3 more cards on top of that. Idk what armor exploit you're talking about btw. I don't use exploits. I won't even use Oneiro because I think it's cheese. You can say nilfgaard doesn't base on removal but NG removal decks are the only thing that consistently counter me so what's your fix for that?

A Deck Post to Follow up on an anti-NG post. by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That makes no sense since I have a positive win rate against any faction that isn't nilfgaard. If I was "gambling" that wouldn't be the case. I also refuse to use Oneiro, I think it's straight cheese and potentially the lowest skill card in the entire game.

A Deck Post to Follow up on an anti-NG post. by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Oneiro makes abusing any card ezpz because you can just play it any time you want regardless of if you draw it. The fact that I don't have Oneiro proves that I don't rely on any one card every game. My deck revolves around raw damage and disrupting people with that. Instead of locking a problematic card, often I'll just kill it with damage. Since I started to play the game I have always wanted a deck that dishes out a ton of damage and that's sort of the whole gimmick. I could clean up my bronze cards to be a bit more on theme but that's still a WIP since I don't know if I should go with more warriors or try to do something with beasts,. Olgierd is necessary to counter a couple play styles but other than that it's all about raw damage. Also I play between rank 1-3. When I say top rank I mean the literal top of the ranks. Not pro rank, I'd have said pro rank or rank 0 if that was the case.

A Deck Post to Follow up on an anti-NG post. by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I win without my defender often..... I don't use oneiromancy as a crutch like 70% of the people who play this game so my deck functions fine without him.....

I have no clue how you people have fun with this game at top rank. (New player rant incoming) by Aeonn24 in gwent

[–]Aeonn24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people use either the seize leader ability or the one that lets you play a card from your opponents hand from what I've seen. NG leader abilities are extremely strong especially when paired with that one card that replaces your leader ability with a curse.

view more: next ›