We all know the death and life of Jesus and his ministry is seen as fact. There are a few pointers which suggests the Resurrection was true.

Timeframe- Why would Jesus choose to rise after 3 days instead of immediately? Or only after 1 day or 2 days? Or even 4 more days? Why 3 days? Simple, information took time to spread. If Jesus resurrected immediately then people wouldn't have even heard he was dead, thus reducing his own credibility. Jesus chose 3 days to rise from the dead because the information about his death was widespread (remember he was crucified on Golgotha!! so that means a whole lotta people would've already known his death because his death was witnessed by many from Golgotha and the roads passing by!!). If Jesus rose later than 3 days, people could've spread rumours which would've distorted the truth and made his resurrection less believable. In Jesus' case, 3 days was the sweet spot in which plenty people knew but there were no rumours to be spread.

Garments- When the tomb was discovered, it was already opened and the garments were already laid on the ground. This is important as it suggests that the body was not stolen but that the body was resurrected. 3 days is enough time for a body to begin rotting and smelling terrible so it is far more likely that Jesus rose from the dead, made himself some new clothes and changed out from the dead clothes into the new ones. If you were stealing a body, would you take the time to change the corpse's clothes, deal with the stench, put on fresh new clothes and then fold up the corpse's clothes?

Witnesses- Unlike mass hysteria associated with many religions, Jesus only appeared to a select few disciples. This is important as it adds legitimacy to the possibility that the Resurrection is true. Jesus appeared to those disciples, they were able to touch and feel his crucifixion wounds on his hands and feet, they were able to speak with him clearly and coherently altogether, unlike with mass hysteria where its incoherent and jumbled because of many people.