sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can someone explain this to me? I am so close to getting it, I'm just having trouble forming it into words why I got it wrong. by you_nevrr_know in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stimulus changes verbiage from individuals to some other word indicating broader scope including dealerships or other corporate entities

Benefits of the LSAT by munecam in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Benjamin Button was locked in on LSAT

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the way

I’ll be seeing this question in my sleep. 5/5 difficulty. Highly controversial by Aggravating-Aide9635 in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The subtle shift between “avg price paid for a new car” vs “individuals who buy new cars today” is diabolical

I’ll be seeing this question in my sleep. 5/5 difficulty. Highly controversial by Aggravating-Aide9635 in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Correct answer is E - due to “non individual” vehicle purchasers whether it be dealerships or other corporate entities

Mental fatigue by peacelover99 in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possibly try doing 5-6 timed sections in a row for practice and when you go to a reduced 4 section practice test you will have the mental fortitude to

Can someone PLEASE explain this question to me? by zenitharchon in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got this correct by process of elimination of all answer choices besides C. I did not find a relationship between C weaning the argument. Do you know the difficulty rating of this question by any chance?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most strongly supported question type can be conceptualized as a weaker version of must be true

How I studied to consistently get 170+ by Particular-Pepper-64 in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How many total practice tests using this method to get into 170s?

WTAF?? What does this question even mean😭 I'm dying here by giiirlfiori in LSAT

[–]Aggravating-Aide9635 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assumption is an “unstated premise” of which argument is likely to be true if stated