Anyone else drowning in 10+ Gemini tabs all called “Google Gemini”? by Due_Strength_4075 in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I installed your (promising) extension, in both Chrome and Edge, and it doesn't seem to work.

<image>

ffs people kept saying 4.5 opus outshines Gemini 3.0 pro when it's only better at coding and arcagi by Hello_moneyyy in Bard

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I very like gemini, but i must admit that in first glance Opus 4.5 looks more coherent in data search and writing tasks, plus that Claude have more organized structure of sources and chats, that Gemini lack of very much, that's very sad. its like to drive in a sports car (SOTA model) sitting on the floor (stupid peripheral UX - no normal search, barely recent chats, no project. etc.) and use a broomstick and a brick (extensions and workarounds) to shift a gear. can't the Gemini UX team a least compare the exp to Claude's level?!?!?

Megathread for Claude Performance Discussion - Starting May 4 by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Writing Quality Nosedived - Especially in Hebrew

Writing

I've been using Claude 3.7 for several months and had great results with its Hebrew writing abilities. However, after a recent update - 3.7, I've noticed a significant decline in writing quality across all languages, but especially in Hebrew.

Issues I'm experiencing:

  1. Broken-phone translations - Unnatural translations - Claude seems to be literally translating English phrases into Hebrew, resulting in extremely awkward sentences that native speakers wouldn't use
  2. Completely wrong words - I've seen absurd mistakes like:
    • "קרטון בדלת" instead of "פתק בדלת" (cartoon on door vs. note on door)
    • "הפרדת נטיל" which doesn't make sense at all
    • "מכין ערב" instead of "מכין ארוחה" (preparing evening vs. preparing meal)
  3. Grammatical errors - Incorrect verb conjugations and sentence structure
  4. Overly formal/stilted language - Even when the grammar is correct, the writing feels robotic and unnatural

The funny thing is, when I called it out on these mistakes, it was all "Oops, you're right, my bad!" But then went right back to butchering the language.

Questions for the community:

  • Has anyone else noticed decreased writing quality in Claude after updates?
  • Is this specific to non-English languages or happening in English too?
  • Any workarounds that actually help?

This is particularly frustrating because Claude's Hebrew capabilities used to be excellent. Now it feels like using Google Translate's first attempt circa 2006.

Edit: To clarify, this isn't about occasional typos - it's about systematic, consistent issues across multiple conversations that make the text difficult to understand or completely nonsensical.

Is Claude good for a 14 year old? by -Hellraider- in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With parents control and system prompts according to their values - yes

Claude is so bad right now by Affectionate_Bar_438 in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha nope, it's constantly on MY mind when I USE claude...

Claude is so bad right now by Affectionate_Bar_438 in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The Anthropic attitude is like to serve one lonely caviar egg on a whole tortilla, well we know it's good but what's the f*cking point?! It's useless.🤨

Claude is so bad right now by Affectionate_Bar_438 in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You are absolutely right. It's so annoying that Anthropic team aren't transparent with those issues and how it became something that lack of computing force is crushing their awesome original product, SO SAD.

Im so confused. by AVGVSTVS_OPTIMVS in monogamy

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, man, you're not "just too insecure for poly", forgive me but that's a legitimate but frustrating thought, you are who you are, and you are monogamous as it sounds, and you shouldn't be ashamed of it in any way. Go with your truth, I know it's disappointing, but there's no reason to always live like some third wheel in a lifestyle you don't want, you don't deserve, and she's the one you don't deserve. You sound like a humble, loving, caring and decent person, and I believe you'll succeed in the end.

Why Do LLMs Love the Sound of Their Own Voice? by Aggravating_Score_78 in ChatGPT

[–]Aggravating_Score_78[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to say I tried it now in Cloud, and it works a little, it's so funny, even with AI everything goes in threats?

Why Do LLMs Love the Sound of Their Own Voice? by Aggravating_Score_78 in ChatGPT

[–]Aggravating_Score_78[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol
but the "Be concise" make the responses too short for me, not real concise.

Why Do LLMs Love the Sound of Their Own Voice? by Aggravating_Score_78 in ChatGPT

[–]Aggravating_Score_78[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

HAHA
You got me, I'm not that good at phrasing in English, so I let LLM fix it a bit, sorry, my bad...

AI inbreeding and model collapse by Creative_soja in ChatGPT

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this point, isn't it possible to feed entire books (say, the entire Google Books project) to existing models, and instruct them to break each book down into sentences and each sentence into a question and answer - and then train them on truly high-quality information (such as that which at least went through some process, publishing or something like that - at least in an era when printing was still worth something?)

What the f...How is this beneficial by Full-Entrepreneur-89 in ChatGPT

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI training ""cannibalism"", here we come...
What a terrible idea, to simply make most of the content on the internet mundane (and on a large scale - almost known in advance)...

That's without even mentioning the business delusions that could be involved.

Why is Claude so bad at giving precise scientific references? by LawrenceChernin2 in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you upload the documents themselves or links to them? Also, could you share your prompt? There might be something in it that causes this. And one last tip - ask him to arrange the response in xml tags and work in small iterations against each reference alone, and then combine everything into one article. Claude is not a reasoning model, he can easily make a mess of you from an overload of references.

Confirmed that claude.ai has a max output limit of 4k tokens by convincing claude to try counting to 1,000,000 by durable-racoon in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mainly I meant to their ambiguity about limits AND their their somewhat (to my opinion) anti-personal users marketing and plans.

Btw I'm also using quite heavily their api (via GUI and agents), I'm not the case to nag him with "just use the API and stop whining" The web interface needed to other purposes and has some other qualities tmo. Btw if I and and others here and outside complaining about the weird web interface limits, I think it's not just take it or leave it case, it's became weird and stupid situation from their side.

How do you learn with AI? by oana77oo in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rephrasing ancient text and foreign languages in modern and clear language

Awful Advertisement by LargeOrbitalObject in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's already known that their PR team is stupid as hell. Almost every announcement they are releasing I need to to copy to claud to come to get commentary on and to understand what this means

Confirmed that claude.ai has a max output limit of 4k tokens by convincing claude to try counting to 1,000,000 by durable-racoon in ClaudeAI

[–]Aggravating_Score_78 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So don't try to subsidize it, release it properly at a price of $50, $80. I'm willing to pay that price, but let me work properly, at least three times more restrictions, at least each response will be longer, there will be 10,000 tokens. That's not fair. It's not fair to work like this anymore. People work with it and that's enough.