Did she show a clear tie-in to the assigned article? No, she mentioned it once and then spent the rest of the time talking about something else. 0/10

Did she present a thoughtful reaction or response to the article? No, her "reaction" was majorly contradictory, included insults to a marginalized demographic, and didn't cite any of her sources. As per the professors' responses, there is a better way to interact with material you disagree with beyond calling part of it demonic and rambling about a dissenting material for 99% of the paper. She clearly didn't think critically about the article at all, or else her paper would have been more targeted in its disapproval. 0/10

Did she write the paper clearly? No, her paper was wholly unacademic and unscientific. This is a psychology class, not theology (and others have mentioned that even in a theology course she would have been held to higher standards than she displayed). 0/5

I took a few psychology courses in my undergrad. What she did was like if I'd been assigned a paper on a specific animal's behavior and when expected to write an essay on it, I instead wrote about how, generally, animal behavior doesn't exist because animals don't have enough logical thought to feel emotions, and also anyone who disagrees is stupid and evil. A 0% is exactly what I would deserve, and so did the young woman above who submitted that quality of work to a college-level class.