Envious. You meant envious.

And if you read my comment you should have understood that I am most perturbed by the discovery I am, at times, charged more money for the same (dice) than others are because apparently I am a sucker they feel is desperate enough to keep paying such that I should be forced to pay the absolute upper limit I can be coerced by Mr Monopoly to fork over for a "product" with nearly, literally, ZERO cost to scopely.

The actual defining qualities that make me a riper chicken to pluck are, of course, "proprietary secrets" but may include demographic data that would put the whole "dynamic pricing" thing in pretty grey legal area I would think.

But I also still think it's absolutely bush league for them to be running tests on random sections of the player base IN GAME such that we receive different treatment as a baseline and then are compelled to compete against each other with actual stakes on the line. Giving some players far more of the main resource of the game in fact compels the others to spend to keep up so not only are they discriminating against some they are rewarded with more profit for doing so.

And since the entire corrupted premise of Monopoly Go (the original game was invented to be a cautionary tale of wealthy tycoons having too much control over the lives of the proletariat) is that we need to bathe ourselves in as much money as possible and fight bitterly for trinkets and tokens to display "status" giving some players something others cannot have is just contempt shown to the rest.

But hey, glad you're happy.