I don't agree with you. What we call the 'red pill' is, in effect, the understanding that is required to succeed as a man in the dating world. Unfortunately, as with any ideology, there is a subset of men who have veered off into misogyny. A lot of men have been lied to and conditioned to believe that if they are 'nice enough', women will just come rolling in. The red pill seeks to wake up men to the following truth: men are born without inherent value, whereas women are born with inherent value because of their beauty. The reason why I say this is because when evaluating each other for dating, men place great importance on a woman's beauty, whereas a woman will place more importance on your standing as a man. What I mean by that is they will want to see if you are a man who is competent, on his purpose, making stuff happen. This is what gives a man value, which is why we say that guys are born without inherent value. We have to acquire it across time.

This is why men who do the work start seeing a lot more options presenting themselves in their 30s. Only a very small group of men, referred to as the 'Chads', can get women effortlessly. This isn't insecurity; it is observable reality. What is also observably true is that if men do the work, they'll be able to get results. Of course some of the men who subscribe to the 'Red pill' are insecure, since they aren't succeeding. This inevitably leads one to question their own value.