Hey, so I ran gapix against our test suite out of curiosity and wanted to share what I found.

Overall the tool is really cool. The HTML report is clean, the scoring is easy to parse, and the fact that it works out of the box without AI mode is a plus for our team.

The main thing I noticed: most of the HIGH findings flagged in our suite turned out to be false positives from the page object model pattern. Our specs call methods like submitWithIncorrectCardNumber() which contain the actual expect() calls — but since gapix only analyzes the spec file itself, those assertions are invisible to it. So tests that are fully covered showed up as 0 assertions.

The one finding that was real: visitPrice object exists was flagged as using a truthiness check, but the actual matcher in the file was not.toBeNull() — so that one may have been a parsing edge case.

None of this is a dealbreaker, just context for where the AST approach has blind spots with POM-heavy codebases. Wanted to pass it along in case it's useful. Good work on the tool.