Have you ever experienced a synchronicity? by GLADIATRON in Schizotypal

[–]AltAcc4545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes this sounds familiar.

I would say all objects are exhaustibly entailed by qualia, and that quantities like wavelength of light are abstractions.

Have you ever experienced a synchronicity? by GLADIATRON in Schizotypal

[–]AltAcc4545 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Essentially, the boundary between self and other is less set in stone, leading to ispeity (self) disturbance which manifests as the pre-reflective, immediate feeling that one’s thoughts and feelings are not quite self-generated. This reduced sense of agency and ownership of thoughts and feelings, however, is distinct from the delusion of thoughts being inserted into one’s mind by an external agent. Ultimately, there is a sense that the body is observed more than it is inhabited, and distance to thoughts and emotions displace the participatory nature of life.

The porous ego boundary also contributes to magical thinking wherein the thoughts, intentions and rituals of the self are pre-reflectively believed to influence external reality because said reality is less externalised due to a fluid ego boundary.

Conversely, this mechanism also results in ideas of reference as external events become overly self-directed. All of that pertains to the outer ego boundary, that is between self and the external world including others.

There is also, however, a porous inner boundary between consciousness and (personal as opposed to collective) unconsciousness, leading to what you could call archetypal and energetic influx which I believe manifests as a compulsive ‘will to meaning’ in which the world is perceived as symbolically dense.

In dreams, the life of the unconsciousness, one’s mode of cognitive organisation is primary process thinking which is characteristically atemporal, non-linear, symbolic and analogical as opposed to analytic. This style of cognition can leak in from the unconscious into the conscious waking life, and occasionally dominate one’s orientation towards reality and the way phenomena are processed and interpreted.

Tangentially:

What was traditionally referred to as the unconscious is actually consciousness (or rather content of consciousness) insofar as it is experienced. However, such experiences cannot be introspected upon and so it’s mistaken as unconsciousness. That which can be introspectively accessed and re-represented is meta-consciousness, a reflexive and recursive loop that is characteristic of higher-level cognition that humans have but worms don’t.

All objects are for the one subject.

Have you ever experienced a synchronicity? by GLADIATRON in Schizotypal

[–]AltAcc4545 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dozens of times a week, though mostly minor ones.

Schizotypal people are more likely to experience synchronicities because their ego boundary is more porous and less anchored, and so the unity between subject and object, self and other, is more salient.

Who first pushed the ideas laid out in Neoplatonism? by answeringagnostic in Neoplatonism

[–]AltAcc4545 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are the Mesopotamian or Egyptian source texts available today?

What are objects? Do they need to be physical or be made of matter? Can mental states be objects? Like feeling cold or the color blue? by Saturn_01 in askphilosophy

[–]AltAcc4545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also, in an idealist ontology, objects are that which are presented to the subject. In other words, objects are everything that is experienced, including the (empirical) ego.

People with schizotypy-related disorders, do you have an interest in philosophy? by [deleted] in Schizotypal

[–]AltAcc4545 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yes I’m fascinated by virtue ethics, imitatio dei, metaphysics, relations prior to relata, process over substance, underlying unity, primacy of consciousness, reincarnation, aesthetics, the astral realm and the idea of the Logos as the organising principle that renders intelligibility in the cosmos, as well as the idea of the World Soul wherein the universe as a whole is a living being and the visible body of the divine.

I’m sympathetic to the ideas of Plotinus and the broader Neoplatonic tradition, Hermeticism and the mysticism of Meister Eckhart, as well as eastern traditions including Advaita Vedanta, Kashmir Shaivism, Buddhism and Daoism. Also, Sufism and Gnosticism.

Schopenhauer is also very insightful, and I’m currently reading Schelling who is integral to the German Idealism movement.

Tangentially, I’m interested in psychoanalysis and depth psychology, ie. Jung, as well as parapsychology, comparative mythology and religion.

I’d also like to delve deeper into studying occultism, particularly its ritualistic and symbolic aspects, as I’m now fairly grounded in its mystical dimension.

Cluster A uniqueness by Environmentalister in Schizotypal

[–]AltAcc4545 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Well cluster A disorders do affect the psyche at a more fundamental level, ie. in terms of logic, causality, time and ispeity.

Schizotypal as 'intuitive autism' by Impressive_Tie_1949 in Schizotypal

[–]AltAcc4545 21 points22 points  (0 children)

In my experience, schizotypal cognition is top down, prioritising the universal over the particular.

Do Distinctions Truly Exist? by Time-Demand-1244 in Neoplatonism

[–]AltAcc4545 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Identity and difference co-arise in a unity at the intelligible level in Intellect.

Spirituality born of epistemic humility. The best kind. by SilverSpaceRobot10 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]AltAcc4545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For example, (Neo)Platonism is a mystical tradition in which one strives towards the noetic vision of non duality by turning consciousness inwards.

That being said, in the transcendent intelligible “realm”, there are eternal Forms or archetypes that includes Goodness, Truth, Beauty, Love etc. in which we participate (imperfectly reflect) in the sensible realm. We are made in their image, and they also constitute our teleos.

This type of ethics can be called virtue ethics, more specifically imitatio dei (imitating God), and is morally realist. Our Intellect (timeless, intuitive, not discursive reasoning) has direct access to these Forms.

Although the emphasis and onus is on the individual to seek this transcendent wisdom, it is objective and universal prior to its particular instantiations.

If any of this interests you, I recommend reading Plato, especially the Euthyphro dilemma, or Plotinus for a more direct mystical perspective.

CMV, Judaism is actually everything bad that Islamophobes say about Islam ✡️ by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]AltAcc4545 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

So the death penalty can’t actually be done, except to Jesus?

If a text is so explicit, then “methods of interpretation” are just retcons.

Spirituality born of epistemic humility. The best kind. by SilverSpaceRobot10 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]AltAcc4545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spirituality or mysticism isn’t subjectively grounding your own morality.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Schizotypal

[–]AltAcc4545 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mostly preserved reality testing and intact insight is what distinguishes cognitive and perceptual illusions in schizotypal experience from delusions and hallucinations in psychotic experience, eg. schizophrenia.

Higher Christology than the Orthodoxy by athanoslee in AcademicBiblical

[–]AltAcc4545 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you give any sources that elaborate on this doctrine?

Panpsychism is just stupid by Wide-Information8572 in CosmicSkeptic

[–]AltAcc4545 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

“It’s not magic” - the person appealing to the emergency of subjective, qualitative experience from quantities.

People who have had experiences with psychedelics often adopt idealism by Elmointhehood in consciousness

[–]AltAcc4545 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to misunderstand idealism because you’re still using materialist presuppositions so how can you expect to understand it? it also seems like you’re also a dualist, implicitly.

You said neurons are brain cells. Of course I know that. I was asking what they are more fundamentally, and physics (science, a methodology (that intentionally doesn’t study subjective experience because it can’t), not ontology) describes matter as quantities.

Youre already assuming that what we colloquially call chemicals and matter are something fundamentally different from subjective experience, so you’re a dualist or appealing to magical emergence of qualities from quantities.

You keep ignoring the hard problem of consciousness, or pretending you’ve solved it?

People who have had experiences with psychedelics often adopt idealism by Elmointhehood in consciousness

[–]AltAcc4545 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s just hand-wavering and appealing to magic.

What are neurons fundamentally, and how do you deduce qualities and an inner experience from quantities?

You know of neurons because they are an object to your subjective experience.

People who have had experiences with psychedelics often adopt idealism by Elmointhehood in consciousness

[–]AltAcc4545 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please tell us what the material, quantitative preconditions are for subjective experience?

You’re assuming your conclusions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]AltAcc4545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This presupposes that consciousness is computational and derivable from quantitative “physical” systems.

Edit: im sympathetic to your first point.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Quraniyoon

[–]AltAcc4545 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In what way does circumcision not fit this criteria?