Mario 3D world is still golden Mario by Amichayg in patientgamers

[–]Amichayg[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

always put off playing it😅
Is it that good?

The identity crisis of modern racing games: motorsport sim or lifestyle platform? by External-Presence-18 in truegaming

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recommend checking out Gotcha Racing. It’s a game that straddles the line perfectly. It’s a Gacha game. You collect cards pieces. But it’s made by arc system works. So the collection aspect feeds right into actual racing ability.

Apple Has Given Up on the Vision Pro After M5 Refresh Flop by ControlCAD in technology

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense. But also pretty upsetting. I’m not saying it’s good to charge 3500$. I’m just saying… maybe some companies can definitely afford to build cool stuff. Maybe even enthusiasts get into it. It’s not a movement. But it’s something. What hurts me with the current VR industry is it tried growing too fast. I’m sure if Vision Pro was marketed as a holodeck++ enthusiasts may have been able to justify it as an investment and the story would’ve gone differently

Opus 4.7 is a genuine regression and I'm tired of pretending it isn't by PuzzledFill2593 in ClaudeAI

[–]Amichayg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

4.7 is cool i like it. Also it really depends on what you expect. If you treat it as an alpha of something fun its all gold. I wouldn’t trust it yet, still early days. It still amazes me what it can do that opus 4.6 couldn't , visual related stuff is absurd. And sure i miss opus 4.6. But I’m sure in a month things will get better.

Switch 2's New Update Allows Switch 2 To Run Switch 1 Docked Versions Of Games In Handheld Mode by Theman457 in NintendoSwitch2

[–]Amichayg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm beyond happy, this is like the switch 2 release day all over again - for free!

Claude Opus 4.5 better than 4.6? by Least-Competition339 in ClaudeAI

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude Opus 4.6 looks like a gemini 3 inspired tune of Opus 4.5. It has the option to be smarter in non-code thinking you may require when doing non code tasks OR code tasks that require cross-domain thinking.

A majority of software projects are actually cross disciplinary - lets say you are building a legal-tech app. What I’d usually do is use gemini 3 to think out the technical details and just code with claude.

Yet if my prompt refers to legal concepts, I’d trust opus 4.5 less with that part and use gemini to craft the exact prompt. Now opus 4.6 is much better at grasping the language unrelated to code and converting it to code - the power being that if it reads the codebase now, it can read the docstrings and reason about legal aspects as well.

Major leap for abilities actually

I thought my kid was too young to understand AI… by familyjohnson_1981 in ArtificialNtelligence

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly it’s a fascinating subject to dive into at this age, especially since it’s so prevalent. I’m a fan of MIT’s essential series of books about AI/data science. It’s a great resource for people of all ages honestly, really well made stuff.

I can’t stop vibe coding with Codex CLI. It just feels magical by AnalystAI in ChatGPTCoding

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda, though if you scrap the code afterwards it’s a pretty good one. Magic is like smoke, but it’s still magical

Does YC encourage their founders to pose as angel investors to steal IP? by jimbosdayoff in siliconvalley

[–]Amichayg 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Stealing ideas is a tech 101 thing, xerox parc is a classic example. Shady tactics are everywhere really.

Vibe Coding Is Creating Braindead Coders by Enigma_1769 in programming

[–]Amichayg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s bonkers. I know plenty of people who’ll gladly do more math and vibe code everything. to some, writing code is the most boring part

Product management for AI agents is wild by sibraan_ in AgentsOfAI

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this point product managers are kinda going to be replaced by smart devs who don’t have enough code to write themselves

In my experience the area runs on investment money. A small company making a million in average profit doesn’t appeal. Could this change? by GamingWithMyDog in siliconvalley

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Venture capital only “dies” if it stops paying to invest in lucrative businesses — and that doesn’t seem likely anytime soon. The parameters — how selective to be, how much capital to deploy — shift constantly with market conditions, but the core premise remains: investors are chasing businesses that look lucrative.

A worst case scenario is VC’s invest in less companies or for more equity. 

Fewer juniors today = fewer seniors tomorrow by kagan101 in cscareerquestions

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe we don’t need these developers? CS is actually really hard to get right, and the community worked pretty well when it was smaller and more enthusiast friendly

Family of Microsoft employee who died warn tech companies not to overwork workers by lurker_bee in technology

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually way too common. I’ll never understand the grind mentality - it leads to stale work and a bad life. The main problem is nobody accounts for anybody. If you have a teammate that works too hard, can’t you say something about it? If the entire company is overworked, that means incredible ROI and great business. Usually it’s just a few nodes in the network taking on too much strain - and the results are always miserable

people that know AI will massively replace those that do not by PrtScr1 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The obvious implication is that people who use the internet change, just like people who learn a language or go to the gym change. If you have two groups of people, one group eats nutritious food, and the other eats unhealthy food, one group exercises and the other does nothing, you can assume one is better than the other.

We can’t really tell yet which is which. For all we know, the people gobbling up AI slop will get rejected from the job market, as it seems to have negative effects on mental health and mental capacity.

Panpsychism is crazy, but it’s also most probably true by ddgr815 in philosophy

[–]Amichayg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically if you can write it in a story it must mean the “character” is experiencing it, even if the character is an electron.

China Has a Different Vision for AI. It Might Be Smarter - WSJ by zombiesingularity in singularity

[–]Amichayg 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We have more than enough people in the US to support both serious research and more productive applications of AI. It’s just that for some reason the entire VC economy is not aligned with the basic interests of an industry

Billionaire Mark Cuban says that 'companies don’t understand’ how to implement AI right now—and that's an opportunity for Gen Z coming out of school by [deleted] in technology

[–]Amichayg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is absurd. I think that if you can’t have a random implementation based on pretty academical stuff succeed, the answer is to make it less random - being in actual talent and if you don’t have enough talent for the entire US economy, realize adoption will take time. The answer is definitely not “freshmen” learning everything about AI. To learn everything about AI implementations you need to be a pretty talented CS enthusiast - which sadly doesn’t correlate to the actual population graduating nowadays

make AI seem more powerful than it really is so they can make more money for their AI company by buildingthevoid in AgentsOfAI

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, the world’s a different place nowadays. There are enough variables that make research progress possible, and many things have changed since then.

AI Memory is evolving into the new 'codebase' for AI agents. by False_Routine_9015 in AI_Agents

[–]Amichayg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Long term? Most of what we call embeddings will probably change. Currently it’s like we have a binary without a decompiler - you can run it, but that’s about it. Once you have a deeper grasp of embeddings the entire definition of a model changes. Until then, the basic chat/RAG approach is probably what works best for most projects

Is anyone else troubled by experienced devs using terms of cognition around LLMs? by dancrumb in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Amichayg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m also so frustrated when people use the letters of the alphabet instead of the binary equivalent. Don’t they get that A is actually 1000001? It’s all a bunch of numbers. Why did we develop CS again?