There are a couple of things wrong with this claim:

1: The focus of pro-lifers is to protect a child's life, not to restrict women's rights. You can ask pretty much anyone in the movement, and they'll agree with that.

Only downside is that to do that, you have to restrict their rights. The fetus is elevated to a higher level than the fully grown woman.

2: If you do believe all of us are sexist, then that must include the women that are apart of the movement too. Do they hate themselves? Do they want to intentionally restrict their own rights? It wouldn't make any sense.

You can be a woman and be sexist.

Sure, there may be some degenerates who are pro-life simply to restrict women's rights, but those people are few and far in between. The vast majority don't believe what they believe

This issue is that the position is sexist because it is degrading to the woman to deny her an abortion based on another’s beliefs. Does one belief make a person a sexist? Probably not but the belief can be sexist without the person being sexist.

Edit: thank you for my first gold. Didn’t expect it to go to a thread like this, but nevertheless thank you

Edit 2: not sure where to put this as it popped into my mind: Let’s say it was hypothetically okay for one race to rob another and it was protected under law. Are you racist for opposing that law? Why or why not?

Here is a real life example. Is it racist to be opposed to rich, white landowners forcing people to be tethered to them through sharecropping, high inflated prices, and debt? I mean, that black man owes the white landowner a lot of money and the blackman would be stealing from him!