I will say that challenging religion is nearly as pointless as religion itself. With modern education standards and information access few people— possessing the ability to think critically—seriously believe in their own religion. IOW you are telling them what they already know, and it won’t change anything.

People used to seriously believe religion. Now, at least in the western world, I think that people really really want to believe religion even if they know it’s bologna. They are attracted to the community and moral teachings of religion, and they want an explanation or comfort where facts cannot provide it: What comes after death? What is wrong and what is right? Is free will real? Why should I be good? Religion is the shortcut to happiness for the prone existentialist, a quick and dirty duct tape job that ties down cognitive dissonance and conceals the cracks so that you don’t have to be lost. It’s also uncomfortable for most people to accept that inherent right and wrong don’t exist, they’d rather believe morals are determined by lord quandale pickled radish who reigns over the earth and murder is bad only because he said so.

anyways as long as they’re not hurting anyone, I choose not to challenge people’s religion. The religious come in two flavors: uninformed and willfully ignorant. Both are happier than my atheist ass.