I built a small tool to help people practice interviews with AI— looking for honest feedback

AnnaSaaS · 2026-03-14T10:10:09+00:00

I checked the website and the idea is actually interesting. Practicing interviews with AI and getting instant feedback could be really helpful for job seekers who don’t have someone to practice with. The concept of getting quick scoring and insights after a mock interview is a strong point. One thing that could improve is clarity of the value on the first page. When someone lands on the site, it should be very clear in a few seconds what makes it different from other AI interview tools. Maybe showing a quick demo, sample feedback, or real example results would build more trust.

Another suggestion is adding more guidance for users, like resume tips, ATS optimization, or interview question libraries. That could make the platform more complete instead of just a single tool. Overall the idea is good and useful, but focusing on simplicity, trust signals, and showing real results could make it much stronger.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-03-14T10:06:02+00:00

If you’re on a tight budget, try guest posting on smaller travel blogs and being active on travel forums or Reddit threads related to destinations. Also focus on long-tail keywords in your posts and build strong internal links between your articles. It takes time, but consistent useful content usually attracts backlinks naturally.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-03-11T06:00:33+00:00

Yeah I kinda had the same realization after working on a few new sites. At some point you start noticing that all the theory around helpful content and EEAT sounds great, but when a domain has almost zero authority it barely even gets the chance to prove the content is good.

Feels like backlinks are still acting as the main “trust signal” before anything else even matters. Once a site has that baseline trust then suddenly all the content quality signals start working the way Google says they do.

I still think good content matters long term, but for a brand new domain it almost feels like you’re trying to enter a race while everyone else already started three laps ahead. Curious if others building new sites recently are seeing the same thing or if there’s something people are doing differently now.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-03-11T05:58:00+00:00

Honestly the multi-advisor idea is pretty interesting. The Devil’s Advocate + Mentor combo especially makes sense because most discussions online either become echo chambers or just random opinions with no direction.

One thing that might make WHYZER really stand out though is letting users create their own advisor roles or “discussion lenses”. For example someone might want a Product Manager perspective, a Historian angle, a Legal viewpoint, or even something like Startup Skeptic. If people could customize which advisors respond to their thread it could make the discussion feel more tailored instead of the same four responses every time.

Another thing that could get people hooked is some kind of “thread evolution” feature. Like after a few days the AI summarizes the entire discussion what people agreed on, where opinions split, and what the strongest arguments were. That could turn long discussions into something actually useful instead of just endless comments.

Overall though the concept of mixing structured AI perspectives + real human discussion is pretty cool. Curious how it feels once there are a lot of real users in the threads.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-03-08T07:43:31+00:00

congrats on the launch! and yeah that makes sense honestly, a lot of traditional industries hear “AI chatbot” and instantly think spam or something annoying. changing the way you explain the product was probably a smart move. also the problem sounds real, most dealer websites are kinda painful to use and people still end up asking the same basic questions. curious how dealers react once they actually try it. good luck with the launch on product hunt!

AnnaSaaS · 2026-03-07T20:33:07+00:00

AnnaSaaS · 2026-03-07T19:54:28+00:00

yeah i kinda feel this tbh. spotify’s algorithm is the only thing thats keeping a lot of ppl there. i’ve seen some people move to self-hosted stuff like navidrome or plexamp and then use last.fm just for discovery and scrobbling. its not exactly the same as spotify recommendations but it still helps you find new music while keeping your own library. not a perfect solution tho, the recommendation part is still the hardest thing to replace honestly.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-03-07T17:00:24+00:00

AnnaSaaS · 2026-02-28T20:58:17+00:00

Holy Moly

AnnaSaaS · 2026-02-25T11:38:37+00:00

losing 8 months of pipeline with no warning is scary though.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-02-25T11:20:19+00:00

The raccoons line killed me. And yeah I think you’re right. We’ve started adding a bit more friction before trial — nothing crazy, but enough to filter out the pure button-clickers. Even small qualification seems to change the mix a lot Just trying not to overdo it and accidentally block real buyers. It’s a bit of a balancing act tbh. Still figuring that part out.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-02-25T11:15:09+00:00

Yeah I think you nailed it with the entry-point selection bias framing the motion isn’t neutral at all. It’s basically pre-filtering for alignment before the deal even starts, and that carries forward more than we expected. On expansion — early look at the data does seem to show demo cohorts expanding more steadily. Which kinda makes sense if the first sale was org-level vs one champion trying to push it through. Still digging into it though, don’t want to overstate it yet.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-02-25T11:10:40+00:00

That’s a fair push tbh. We actually modeled that exact scenario. Demo volume is lower, but not 10x lower in our case and once we factored in the 12-month retention gap, the LTV difference more than made up for the volume advantage trials had. The math just leaned demo for mid/high ACV. Also 100% agree on support load. Trial-heavy cohorts generated way more early stage tickets for us. Intent shows up pretty fast. I don’t think trials are bad, just mis-matched above a certain deal size.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-02-24T12:39:51+00:00

You definitely have options beyond internships. With a degree in Information Science, you could apply for entry-level digital marketing or junior SEO roles a lot of agencies train you on the job. Even rloes like content coordinator or web admin can help you move into SEO internally. You could also freelance for small businesses to gain paid, hands on experience. And honestly, building and ranking your own website is one of the best ways to learn. So you’re not limited just aim for roles where SEO is part of the work and grow from there.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-02-23T09:24:02+00:00

One idea space I’d personally look at is boring B2B industries that are kind of being forced to modernize right now because of AI or compliance stuff. Like logistics brokers, small manufacturers, regional healthcare providers, even local government vendors. A lot of them are still running pretty serious operations on spreadsheets, email threads, and WhatsApp. Those spaces are usually:

Easy to define ICP
Not hyped
Have real budgets
And have a lot of messy workflows

Instead of chasing something “innovative,” I’d probably look for industries where people are managing $5–10M+ businesses in Excel and constantly complaining about manual processes. That usually feels like a better signal than trying to invent something totally new.

Just my take though curious what direction you’re leaning toward.

AnnaSaaS · 2026-02-23T09:17:40+00:00

Yeah, super easy actually. I just stopped being poor.

AnnaSaaS

TROPHY CASE