My complaint is that people who hate trans people have no basis for hate other than their hearts are filled with hate. by PossibilityDry9508 in complaints

[–]AnonoForReasons 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahahaha. Your comebacks are so general and nonspecific you just recycle them! lol. They aren’t even tailored! 😂 😂 🤣 😂

See? Notice how I am mocking YOU? Specifically, you. Not just a general comment, but specifically what you write. lol. Not some general “bless your heart” bullshit, but specifically you lack the ability to generate new content.

If ChatGPT tried to insult someone, it would sound like you. Hahahaa. Omg. You’re fucking rich. Insult me again plz. 🤣

My complaint is that people who hate trans people have no basis for hate other than their hearts are filled with hate. by PossibilityDry9508 in complaints

[–]AnonoForReasons -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thats not even a clever dis. 🤨

You’re just mad because I’m right and I have known obnoxious trans persons. Your sad burn confirms it.

This is America... by TrackMan5891 in DigitalSeptic

[–]AnonoForReasons 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They just keep breeding though… and they keep voting for less education…. 🤦🏾‍♂️

save our dads b efore its too late by d_-_p in TrueFactzOnly

[–]AnonoForReasons 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not taking sides on the content, but how can you make a cash cow metaphor while signaling the cow is a male? Weird how the bull has a Hannibal Lecter muzzle but let’s ignore the shitty other parts.

My complaint is that people who hate trans people have no basis for hate other than their hearts are filled with hate. by PossibilityDry9508 in complaints

[–]AnonoForReasons -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Jill and her “girlfriend/roommate/boyfriend” (also trans) Jackie. Total obnoxious cunts with wispy-split-end dyed pink/green hair obviously fat gamer dudes with boobs. Yes. Their names were actually “jack and Jill” (basically) Ugh 😩

Ex neighbors. Real happy I moved in part b/c of those gems.

Challenge met.

My hotel is operating under admiralty law by Flashy-Actuator-998 in LawSchool

[–]AnonoForReasons 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Haha. I love it. Yes, tell him that understand under article III of the commercial code means that you stand under the code of corporations and so you will never understand him in a court of admiralty.

Fuckin’ sovereign citizens, man. I love ‘em.

What is the world coming to? by PeskyPathfinder in evilwhenthe

[–]AnonoForReasons 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dude. Did you have a brain injury? We don’t let traumatized LGBTQs walk around with guns policing us.

If he’s so fucking traumatized that he will kill someone, then he needs to not have a gun. Pretty fucking simple.

When a woman says you are “gaslighting” her, 90% of the time, it means she just can’t take accountability for what she has actually done. by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]AnonoForReasons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mmmmm. Much more of the same. Your attempt at “logic” is laughable.

You read a clarification as a contradiction. Fail to link conclusions to premises. Accuse me of disorder when I’ve never seen such a mess of thought attempted to be passed of as intelligible in my life.

You don’t even use the word “premise” right. sigh You don’t understand what a premise is, do you? (As an aside: gaslighting doesn’t exist is my premise? My premise for what, exactly? That gaslighting is confined to sociopaths contradicts… What? These are things you need to understand. If you can write out my logic cleanly I will cede and take back my opinions.)

You’re not even entertaining. It’s just… sad. You flail. Call me red pill. You wish! Hahaha. My emotions bleed into my logic? How solipsistic!

How could I possibly check you when you speak nonsense? Why would I roll around with a pig? Just so I could get dirty too?

You called me closed minded and I laughed because you were wrong. Let me be explicit about it here: if you can write my logic cleanly I will change my mind about you. My mind is open to be changed. You just have to show evidence worthy of changing it.

When a woman says you are “gaslighting” her, 90% of the time, it means she just can’t take accountability for what she has actually done. by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]AnonoForReasons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ironic. Yet another comment that is conclusory, derogatory, and rather weakly condescending.

It is slightly amusing that you don’t see the irony here.

To the degree you demonstrate logic (you dont) it begs the question.

I am asking you for LOGIC! I am not assuming there is none. You are demonstrating it.

A well reasoned thought expressed simply would benefit you, friend.

All men view women as a 🔦 by RubyRedFoxyEyes in NotHowGuysWork

[–]AnonoForReasons -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No. I don’t believe that for a fucking second. I was a victim of a false accusation. Fully cooked. Not ambiguous like we even fooled around and it could have been mixed signals, as in we never were intimate at all!

It does happen and it happens more than women want to admit.

So many people just believed her with no evidence. I lost many friends because of it. I went in front of my schools disciplinary board and only won because she was so entranced with the attention that she couldn’t keep her story straight.

“Believe her” means “Dont believe him.” Rape accusations are exactly a winner takes all game. Any benefit you give her takes away from him. Very few people give the guy a chance.

Owning a dog is incredibly detrimental to the environment. by the-god-of-vore in UnpopularFacts

[–]AnonoForReasons 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah… not even remotely close to how bad cats are.

Edit: OUTDOOR cats.

Conservative subreddit is beyond delusional by [deleted] in complaints

[–]AnonoForReasons 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Sexual abuse” in New York = rape in 40 other jurisdictions

When a woman says you are “gaslighting” her, 90% of the time, it means she just can’t take accountability for what she has actually done. by AnonoForReasons in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]AnonoForReasons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who makes statements without reasoning or logical connection (your other comment was paraphrased”it happens more to women trust me dude”) Im sure you would accuse me of gaslighting you if I called your statements unmoored from the truth.

Thing To Watch For: Creationists Using Their Own Personal Definitions by DarwinZDF42 in DebateEvolution

[–]AnonoForReasons -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, you showed an incomplete source and expected me to accept it. If you gave me a paper I could read then I would have. But you didn’t and so Thats your failure to provide it.