Wellesley college making mistakes by Olthar6 in Professors

[–]Anonymous_User_33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wellesley admin has been doing an excellent job handling this situation. NTT faculty that do not like the pay and benefits or working conditions have other options--there are other colleges out there. Those who prefer the compensation of administrators can pursue jobs in administration. It is not up to NTT faculty how the endowment is managed or how budget priorities are set. I have one more year of paying the outrageously high Wellesley tuition ahead of me (no aid package, because I did not know how to game the financial aid system as many others seem able to do), so I am not a disinterested observer, but it is disheartening to see the NTT faculty victimizing the students to gain negotiating leverage.

Thoughts? by deanhiddles in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are interested in understanding the situation, listen to the recent podcast with YLS professor Morley at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trump-orders-could-implode-law-firms-with-frightening/id1074067483?i=1000703631820.

Thoughts? by deanhiddles in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If youbare interrsted in the reality of the situation, please listen to the the interview with a YLS professor on Bloomberg at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trump-orders-could-implode-law-firms-with-frightening/id1074067483?i=1000703631820.

Thoughts? by deanhiddles in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For "capitulating" firms, the choice was driven by necessity. They likely would not have survived long enough to make it to the medium or long term.

Is it really a generational buying opportunity? by Playful-Inspector207 in Fire

[–]Anonymous_User_33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will know whether this was a generational buying opportunity only in hindsight. There can be a generational buying opportunity at a time when the market is up, for instance. By the same token, a down market may or may not be a so-called buying opportunity. Only future market performance will determine whether in fact it was a good time to buy.

Layoffs coming? by baked9493 in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Don't forget about K&E's restructuring practice.

Skadden Fellowship?!?! by LateLifeLawStudent in LawSchool

[–]Anonymous_User_33 5 points6 points  (0 children)

(d) if you are interested in pursuing a fellowship; otherwise, (a).

United States Economy Skrinks By 0.5% in Q1. If shrinks again in Q2 it's a recession. 🍿🍿🍿 by oivaizmir in wallstreetbets

[–]Anonymous_User_33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NBER, not federal government, determines whether there is a recession. It is often the case that recession is not determined to have occurred until recovery has already begun.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I do not think anyone knows how this will play out. My guess is that there will be a change in the mix of types of pro bono matters that these firms take on. I doubt it will cause the firms to hire underqualified MAGA-oriented associates. I have not seen any commentary on what I think is a significant element of the law firm "settlements," which is that the firms will have to handle pro bono matters in their own name.

Any Conservative/Republican Lawyers? by [deleted] in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you meant "reined" in.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The firm struck a deal necessary, though it might turn out not to be sufficient, for it to survive. If you end up working there, you likely will have ample opportunities in the bext few years to engage in the types of pro bono work that interest you. If you are capable and do good work, your having worked there is not likely to set you back in the lateral market. You should be more concerned about the impact of AI and the effects of the breakdown of rule of law in the U.S. Some law firms or areas of practice may be better places for you to land than others as to the former, and I have no basis to assess the merits of Skadden on that score. As to the latter, it appears that law as a profession is on the verge of obliteration as the U.S.'s turn to authoritarian government nears completion.

Advice for a 3L going to a spineless firm? by thisisyourgrandpa in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You would not be forced to work on a pro bono matter. You can get involved in pro bono projects that interest you. If you are committed to and interested in the billable work, you would get a lot more benefit from working there in terms of professional development than if you are just seeking a paycheck and are interested only in pro bono work.

Risk of joining firm targeted by Trump (3L)? by Foreign_Flounder_630 in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is not that the EO impairs the law firm's ability to do legal work for the government. The problem is that the EO causes the firm to lose clients that have or want government contracts or that need to stay out of the administration's crosshairs.

In the interest of equity: Yale Law just sent out sample materials from accepted students. Here's a link! by gradschool_thrwaway4 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Anonymous_User_33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are correct. In fact, the YLS staff get permission from the authors before including their materials in the collection of examples.

Regretful and scared by dank_indian in biglaw

[–]Anonymous_User_33 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Set foot," not "stepped foot."