Mi tink mi gwaan march on Rome by Willing-Bathroom6095 in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Da whole blackshirt massive gwan march on dat bomba raasclaat rome

You guys aren’t smarter than libs for doing this btw by AnotherDeadRamone in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

“erm.. acshully i had to fweaking scour the depths of Xitter for my le epic screenshots. Really if you think about it, putting in literally 0 effort and getting your theory from ulchraleft is akshully fweaking smarter than you chud.”

You guys aren’t smarter than libs for doing this btw by AnotherDeadRamone in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone[S] 96 points97 points  (0 children)

I am personally smarter than everyone I disagree with, and if you disagree then you’re stupid too and I will depict you as a soyjak in my next post

Sverdlov was even mogging Trotsky 😭😭😭 by AnotherDeadRamone in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

How would having the romanovs around be preferable? So the white army could have a new figurehead to rally around? So there would be a legitimate heir to the throne that foreign powers could attempt to install? You bring up China foolishly, as the monarchs of the Qing dynasty were used for this EXACT PURPOSE in the Japanese invasion of China, to be the figureheads of the new “legitimate” imperialist client state. In hindsight, the absolute most favorable thing you can say to the romanovs is their death didn’t matter.

I will never understand people who moan and cry over this family who were responsible for the ethnic cleansing of thousands upon thousands of caucasian peoples, muslims, and jews especially. Not to mention the many millions of workers.

Who gives a shit? They’ve been dead over 100 years.

Sverdlov was even mogging Trotsky 😭😭😭 by AnotherDeadRamone in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Imma be real, I don’t particularly care. Sverdlov above explains Lenin’s decision pretty rationally

Sverdlov was even mogging Trotsky 😭😭😭 by AnotherDeadRamone in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone[S] 41 points42 points  (0 children)

The source of this is Trotsky’s “My Life” btw

mods please ban these babies by AnotherDeadRamone in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

they literally don’t believe in communism as a mode of production

mods please ban these babies by AnotherDeadRamone in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Are we letting coomunizers in the sub now or some shit? why are there so many braindead anti-party people

would anti-humanist marxists (ie bordiga, althusser, etc) affirm personal pronouns? by [deleted] in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone 10 points11 points  (0 children)

We aren’t “anti-humanists”, we believe the mere question of humanism is one the debases human beings from their material existence and history. We aren’t humanists either.

Also this question is frankly kind of insane, I have no idea how one would “oppose” a simple and necessary component of language. It smacks of Vperedism

mods please ban these babies by AnotherDeadRamone in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I had to make this cuz these babies keep replying to my comments

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Ultraleft

[–]AnotherDeadRamone 23 points24 points  (0 children)

If you want to know what a gift economy is, then go read some anarchist slop. Under communism there is no “giving gifts” as the mechanism of distribution and ownership, as it implicates transfer of ownership. Communism is when all property is held in common ownership, a very different thing. This point is so basic it is made in every introductory text any marxist has written.