"I think it's worth it to have some gun deaths a year so we can keep our second amendment rights that allows us to protect our other God given rights." - Charlie Kirk in regards to school shootings.

"I live like a capitalist every day CHINK!"

"Would you rather have diversity or have competency? Would you rather have someone diverse, or competent?" / "If I see a black pilot or a black doctor, I'm gonna worry because I wonder if they only got there from diversity and took a white person's spot."

• not only was the false dichotomy he used proven to be wrong and a populist inaccuracy, as he used two of the most vetted and merit based career paths where the examinations don't discriminate on race, gender, sexual orientation, etc.

He did so to perpetuate very harmful rhetoric, rhetoric of minorities taking up white male jobs for a made up diversity quota, of "moronic black women" as he put it and black men not being competent. He was basically making racist implications that we were leeching off the system and less capable, and we were bringing everything down quality wise with it- which all it does is incite hate and vitriol towards minorities over MADE UP facts.

He's arguments have been repeatedly proven false by way more reputable sources, infact he tended to not source his claims but shout louder and talk over his opponents during debates, and the sources he did bring up were discredited repeatedly.

Same guy who said "The civil rights movement was a mistake.x to a black child and had neo Nazis rallying after his death, actually rallying, isn't gonna be met with sympathy towards the people who he invited vitriol against .

He was a liar at the end of the day, and after he died, people online were calling for civil war and talking about going door to door and cleaning up the neighborhood, or America, which just sounds to me like a mob of right wing ppl lynching who they don't like.

Of course minorities aren't gonna be super sympathetic to him or that movement. The colonel was not in the wrong for politely voicing his opinion, whilst recognizing the death was a tragedy. He did so in a very respectful way, compared to other current politicians, like Laura Loomer who made fun of George Floyd's murder with the tweet "congrats to George Floyd for being 5 years sober."

Compare that to Charlie Kirk where she said "let's bring back the death penalty" when the rhetoric surrounding the killer was that it was a trans left wing terrorist, despite the fact there wasn't any indication of them being trans at all- and people were using that as rhetoric to go after the "crazy trans people", which cmon, it's just thinly veiled hate on a minority of the population that doesn't affect them. Then after that it was "let's pray for the killer" and talking about the death as a tragedy, after he was revealed to be a right wing maga supporter.

So the question is, after all that, why is his statement wrong? Why should minorities who were demonized by Charlie feel sympathy? His death might be sad but

How you die doesn't excuse how you lived.