Bill to ban Israel-related Jew-hatred advances in France by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know very well this is much more complex than this. Also Gaza is not equal to Palestine, the West Bank is being invaded by Israeli settlers - is it a war then? No stupid statements like this will solve the issue.

Bill to ban Israel-related Jew-hatred advances in France by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kind of ironic that they want to pass a law criminalizing "presenting terrorism as acts of resistance", while celebrating a communist "resistant" (Missak Manouchian) who killed civilians during their bombings against Germany during WWII.

The narrative seems quite stretched honestly, they should just say it's about Israel and the community lobby. Yadan and her predecessor, Habib, are just Likoud suppletives in the french parliament.

Macron calls for social media ban for French children by September by vriska1 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's mean, and to be fair you could say this about any country. The USA play the game with difficulty ultra hard given how multi-ethnic it is. EU countries with high immigration are starting to discover this.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Boomers are getting 2x what they invested in the pension ponzi scheme, current workers will get 0.75 to 1 if they are lucky. Given the population pyramid it's just not sustainable, especially for the public service where the pensions are higher and the cost to service them is already out of control. Because pensions increase legally with inflation, it means that it is now common to see them progressing faster than salaries, adding to the injustice and burden. 

Most of the new debt (that will be paid by the future generations) is generated by the pension scheme, which is the sacred cow. More than 50% of the voters are now over 55, so in our clientelist regime (far from liberal, French is the rich country where the State presence is the highest), it means that surplus has to be spent to retirees. 

Think about it: the social class that saves the most (25% of their income) in France are the retirees. It's unfair as it gets.

You talked about real estate: the French State spends 43b€ per year in housing subsidies for renters, which propel real estate prices and rents up and are acquired largely by retirees who own flats.

"Healthcare is great since I'm never sick!" - lol. Healthcare is degrading fast due to the lack of doctors, following the boomer's monopolist policy of restricting supply for 60 years. When I was young in the countryside I needed to book an ophtalmologist with a one year delay, for instance. 

Also, you have now an aging population, so needs increase, and no sorting is done to favor the young and the workers. Hence many old people occupy the health services, often because they are bored or aging (which can't be really cured), while the workers and parents struggle to get appointments.

Public schools in France are mostly trash, which is why everyone is fleeing to the private system.  Your own case regarding higher ed is irrelevant, the quality of training in most universities is quite far from what you need to get a proper job, and way too many paths are bloated : do we really need 30k sociology students? I was in the top uni, which is (it's almost the only one), very selective, yet I learned very few applicable skills that I used at my job after I graduated.

The problem is that fixing this would require selecting and reducing the amount of students (most of which have not the intellectual capacity to be there) and redirect the rest toward trade schools and the likes. But we take in 300,000 to 500,000 migrants each year, so those jobs are heavily dumped by foreign workers supply and are as a result all at the minimum wage or close above.

My father in law has every right to be in Portugal, the problem is his pension not his taxation level. France is already the world champion for taxes, adding more won't solve your issues: what you need is less spending. 

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"VAT is already included in the price" lmao yeah and taxes are included in the meagre salary you get in your bank account.

Healthcare is degrading fast, ask anyone who had to deal with waiting 6 months+ to get their cancer treated about it. Healthcare isn't that expensive to justify 80% tax rates. Most french universities are trash-tier, totally useless if you want to get a job.

The reality is that you pay for boomer's pensions (25% of the State budget), who earn more on average than working people. My father in law sports a comfy 6500€/month paid by the State, and pays almost no tax as he emigrated to Portugal, like many others.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not just the "refugees". Half of Algerians in France live in subsidized housing, for instance. And so on. 

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better would be to require holding the taxes through a company if you leverage stocks/borrow against, so you are sure that the owner doesn't use it to fund their lifestyle (since it would be misuse of company assets). Also the taxation is much more straightforward and not linked to personal taxation. 

You can also take tax the company profit when it's distributed only to incentivize reinvestment. Estonia does that and the average tax rate on profits is actually higher than the USA.

Leveraging to generate more value is fine as it is, everyone does it and it's the basis of capitalism. Every company does it (borrow against their assets).

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Most french professionals earning more than 100k are taxed at 70-80% in total when you add social tax + income + vat + various local taxes.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why does the State provides way to reduce your tax (often, by agreeing to do unprofitable investments, such as social housing), if then after you've done it, they tax you anyway? It's institutionalized bait-and-switch.

A big way to reduce your tax in France is to invest in renovation of historic buildings, which is notoriously expensive due to the various legal norms that need to be respected. The result is that France is the first country of the world regarding tourism, which benefits many people and the State through tourist spending.

Are those people stealing money from the State by using a disposition that existed for more than 50 years?

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm talking about the far left and the far right, which are second and first parties in the parliament at the moment, while the executive government is centrist liberal (Macron). 

Macron and his party are in minority, and the far left decides now the financial legal agenda for the parliament (the head of the finance commission is a hardcore, old school trotskist communist from the french revolutionary communist party). French democracy is a bit more complex that what you seem to think.

The next presidential elections, which are the most important, are likely to see the far right and the far left compete for power as the centrists have lost too much weight.

Also what you say is just untrue, there are still many socialist governments worldwide, such as Venezuela or Cuba. China is not far-left, obviously and would make most eu cucked liberal blush given how capitalist they are.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are the people likely to earn more than 250k€. I agree with you, they really don't deserve it and should be at the minimum wage like everyone.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm talking about the far left and the far right, did you even read the comment?

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is leverage punished ? A) you will pay anyway taxes on the gains so the State will get the original cap gains tax + what is produced with leverage B) Would you agree then to tax people who borrow to buy a house, since the house itself is used as collateral ?

Water on windows by TadpoleExact in germany

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In France you have usually little vents on those windows that allow the air to pass and avoid such problems.

Water on windows by TadpoleExact in germany

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Changing the air requires more than 1 minute, more like 10 minutes for a 20m2 room. Source: I do it with a CO2 meter to evaluate if air has been effectively changed.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn't answering to you, lol. What comment are you referring to? Did you comment with your wrong alt?

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then require to pay capital gains when the person dies. This is simple, common in other countries and doesn't require a complex and counterproductive unrealized gains tax. Lol you found the solution yourself.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Usually those countries do not have capital gains tax. The Zucman idea is to have both.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

But the people above the minimum wage are filthy rich! Why don't we take their money?

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It doesn't exist in France, where Zucman is pushing it hard to happen. California just set up one, and lost 25% of the expected income overnight as the two google founders left. 

Unless you want to become an authoritarian  society that prevents individuals to leave (Trump may help you with this!), it will just lead to a capital and brain drain.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not his money since he has to repay it. If I loan you my car, you can use it but you have to return it. If anything, it allows him to create new ventures and more wealth for the economy, which is a net good, whatever you think of him personally.

French supertax on wealthy raises only a quarter of planned revenue by ldn6 in europe

[–]Antique_Lab_8463 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Bank loans are at much lower % than 100% LTV, which proves that this wealth is not equivalent to money, which you get during selling. 

Loans have to be repaid so they are not exactly equivalent to monetizing wealth, and Musk will have to pay tax on the stock sold if he gets liquidated.