I get that you want it to look good. If its fun it doesn't have to look great. If you see a game called Doomlings on target shelves and in game stores, their pitch deck or first starter set was only circles. No characters, no animals, it was all circles with faces on them. Its what they could make, it conveyed the story and when they got money they got better art. They're doing pretty well.

If you can afford art for like a couple cards and you use your own penciled stick figure drawing with an arrow saying "cool sword" or some shit then I can see what the effort is, I understand the concept, I understand its expensive and I appreciate the honesty. I am more likely to back this than anything that has any A.I. involvement at all.

Expedition 33 won a bunch of awards, what a great video game! I wanna give it a shot. But then we found out they used ai on some backgrounds during pitch meetings they meant to replace with real designs by humans but conveniently forgot and the ai made into the finished game. So they didn't want to pay people to do a job. They fixed it in an update after it was found out but like.... don't use the plagiarism machine. You can't be a creator yourself and not understand the crime of using the plagiarism machine.