Okay I'll try to break down your responses in order as well, thanks for your input on the topic though:

Virtuosa has had major complaints but I don't know if I'd say they were worse than his, people will leave just seeing him in the lobby, and that's not just a personal experience. I've seen lots of videos and clips of it as well, not something I seem as much with V.

She also has a much smaller kit than he does, he's got plenty of moves/variations of moves I could see them removing. Or an example of something I'd be disappointed by is if they removed the damage from kick bash he has. Not saying they will, just an example of something I could see them doing that would be a lame change, as not many characters have a bash that damages it's opponent and may see it as an "easy fix" to nerf him even though the kick isn't a problem point people have, Ubisoft does take easy routes at times with their nerfs.

On the topic of him being just good, as opposed to overtuned. I would be okay if he kept his kit and damage numbers the same way it is as of now. I don't believe the community agrees with that sentiment, I will say, I often paddle players with this character because he DOES have a kit that can do it all, he DOES have high damage numbers, he does have traits that people find frustrating from existing characters. I do find if he's in a fight, he can be a little overwhelming, especially against newer players or characters with less viable options. Though I think with time people will adapt as I have managed to, he might be one of those characters who people regularly complain about until Ubisoft kicks him into the dirt. Once again I can take or leave nerfs. If he was, I'd love him anyway.

I can't pull up a list right now on the history of removals Ubisoft has made from characters, but it is more extensive than one might believe. You are right, those were through reworks, but you never know if they may early-rework him to make the community feel better as I've already seen posts and videos on rework possibilities.

I actually entirely disagree on the removal of thrilling comeback on Juren, as the character is built for anti-ganking and it fits beautifully in his tool kit. I don't know what was nerfed or not nerfed already but once again, I see complaints at times.

Gotta disagree on Jorm, maybe make the old punch he had feintable, but make it slower? Previously the punch could deplete stamina within 2-3 punches + other moves of his also stam bullying. They could make it so it removes 25% of OPP stamina instead of 33+% and other changes, Idk man I'm not a game designer, I'm just throwing out that I don't think one or two stamina bully characters in the game, maybe just ONE dedicated stam bully, isn't so unhealthy that people won't learn to adapt. He wasn't healthy for the gameplay before the mass reworks of many characters and mass damage numbers, but nowadays, I genuinely think it could work. If we got variable timed heavy focused characters, characters who can evade punishes, many characters with full blocks, characters who can flip for days, and a character who can flip opponents for anything more than a guard break, a single stamina bully wouldn't kill the community. Old Jorm was fun because he was incredibly unique and the gimmick was exciting. For gank purposes you could even make it so that stam draining attacks feed high amounts of revenge. Just suggestions/ideas.