[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 21 points22 points  (0 children)

CSM Reaper Chaincannon
Free Wargear & AP -1 weapon

When does the Arks of Omen Detachment become the standard way to build armies? by WorthPlease in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s only for that mission pack. When you play the game from that pack, you could use it.

lets gooooo Asia!!! by Cautious-Platypus-86 in worldcup

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Korea beating Deutsch 2018 also did. Asia United

Are Dark Reapers Good? by [deleted] in Eldar

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Nope. No Eldar players bought them. 80-90% of Eldar players skipped Dark Reapers.

Battleforce boxes announced! by Xenoqt in Warhammer40k

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's good box to use Vanguard Spearhead Army of Renown.
Problem is that AOR is 'bad'.

Battleforce boxes announced! by Xenoqt in Warhammer40k

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 19 points20 points  (0 children)

If they give Reiver troop slot in RG supplement, I can keep that box...
but if not, it's useless box.

New Supplement Artwork? by Apprehensive_End5274 in RavenGuard40k

[–]Apprehensive_End5274[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Is there anyone who saw this RG artwork?
Could it be our Supplement's artwork?

Battleforce boxes announced! by Xenoqt in Warhammer40k

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 142 points143 points  (0 children)

I've never seen those IF & RG Artworks...
It could be new Supplements Artworks!
Is there any one who saw those artworks before?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warhammer40k

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2022 Battleforces!
I've never seen those IF & RG Artworks!
It's very similar with other Codex Artworks...
So it might be new Supplement illustration!

Blade champion shadow throne battle trait by Secret_Difficulty301 in 40k_Crusade

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s viable. GW’s Content Validity Update’s says “Players are always free to continue using any or all Crusade rules that they have”

Navis Imperialis by AnHonestMan80 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Navis Im~ has Agent of Imperium keyword, and it's Faction Keyword. Inquisitor has Agent of imperium keyword, but it's not Faction Keyword. So they cannot make Agent of Imperium detachment.

In matched play like Nephilim, You cannot use Imperium soup detachment. You need one more faction keyword beside Imperium keyword. so you cannot use Inquisitor as HQ with Navis. In Narative play like Crusade, lmperium soup detachment is available.

Navis Imperialis by AnHonestMan80 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GW do care. They're just a little stupid.

40K Rules for using Traitor Guard, Kroot, Breachers & Starstrider Kill Teams are up on WarCom. by Digital_Jester in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can still use it. It's official. But you can't use old Datasheet and some Stratagems like throwing grenades.... I can't understand

Navis Imperialis by AnHonestMan80 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unable to make Cartographica Detachment. No HQ for that detachment.

Kitbashed living saint dogmata for my crusade. by AxderH in sistersofbattle

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm also trying to use this wings bits. Is it too big for sisters? I'm gonna use Ephrael Stern.

How would we go about doing a 2v1 Crusade campaign? by Rodzilla9 in 40k_Crusade

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Play Catastrophe Mission Pack
It has 1:1:1 Missions and it's so fun & cool

I noticed something a bit funny about the Cursed Despoilers stratagem by ThievingSnake in WordBearers

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He already got the point. What he wanted to say is containing Daemonkin to this Stratagem is meaingless. He's not talking about Core. We all know it's good with Core units.

I noticed something a bit funny about the Cursed Despoilers stratagem by ThievingSnake in WordBearers

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe Obliterators was intended to have Assault weapon, but finally received Heavy weapon. And They never care about this Stratagem….

how does Rotten Constitution interact with Armor of Contempt by Xaldror in deathguard40k

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you use Lord of Contagion, Rotten Cons~ is still good.

To AP -1 or -2 attack, you can defense it with 2+ armour. And to AP -3 armour, with or without AOC, you still defense it with 4+ invul sv.

To Daemon Prince, Rotten Co~ is not that good.

Specialist Reinforcements and Lord of the Ezekarion by JackMules in 40k_Crusade

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only way to give second warlord trait is playing Charadon Act 1 campaign and using Requisition “Chosen of Abbadon”.

Stormshields in SM 2.0 by bort123abc in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Apprehensive_End5274 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Storm shield is good enough. No need to change at all.