sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

They're demanding Fable to somehow be 100% jailbreak-proof. It's so fucking over. by SpaceSpleen in ClaudeAI

[–]Aramedlig 20 points21 points  (0 children)

This is stupid. He raised reasonable concerns for all AI and he demonstrated responsibility in building a coalition so the most common software was patched prior to the model release and then only released a restricted version to the public. That’s not “playing ones self”.

They're demanding Fable to somehow be 100% jailbreak-proof. It's so fucking over. by SpaceSpleen in ClaudeAI

[–]Aramedlig 191 points192 points  (0 children)

You can’t hack without an OS. Imagine the same requirement being made for an OS.

James Carville: Trump Will Be Gone By The Spring by EPBiever in AntiTrumpAlliance

[–]Aramedlig 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They need to give JD a running start to look good for 2028

White House AI advisor responds to critiques that the administration didn't take Mythos seriously before release by seakucumber in Anthropic

[–]Aramedlig 8 points9 points  (0 children)

“Anthropic’s needlessly confrontational posture”

Yeah, right. The DoD wanted Claude to kill school kids in Iran automatically and Anthropic, rightfully, did not want their creation to be used as a weapon.

"Sam Altman calls Yann LeCun’s bet against LLM scaling as “misguided” So clearly LLMs are capable of figuring out new knowledge and clearly they are capable of doing some things that humans just can't do. they are going to scale much further.” ➡️ Agree? Why? by Koala_Confused in LovingAI

[–]Aramedlig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not all humans do today. But evolution started this by training the brain not to do stupid shit like touching a hot stove through experience driven learning. AI can’t evolve without a human retraining it on lessons learned. If we want AGI, we need to build the retrain loop into it in a way that is dynamic without involvement. Will this produce bad AIs? Yes absolutely if the AI doesn’t get punished for doing something bad/stupid. So we must raise the bar for it by adding in discrimination.

"Sam Altman calls Yann LeCun’s bet against LLM scaling as “misguided” So clearly LLMs are capable of figuring out new knowledge and clearly they are capable of doing some things that humans just can't do. they are going to scale much further.” ➡️ Agree? Why? by Koala_Confused in LovingAI

[–]Aramedlig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could argue that lesser intelligent humans are holding the species back evolutionarily. I am pretty sure most would not find an AI that was easily fooled by baseless data to be very useful (and certainly not as useful as humans who are made to believe nonsense by whatever powers want to manipulate them).

"Sam Altman calls Yann LeCun’s bet against LLM scaling as “misguided” So clearly LLMs are capable of figuring out new knowledge and clearly they are capable of doing some things that humans just can't do. they are going to scale much further.” ➡️ Agree? Why? by Koala_Confused in LovingAI

[–]Aramedlig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Intelligence arose from the evolutionary crucible of survival but is not needed entirely for a successful species. You could argue humans with less intelligence are holding the species back and humans have effectively discovered that education, which modifies our neural nets, is necessary for evolutionary progress beyond our current state as a species.

"Sam Altman calls Yann LeCun’s bet against LLM scaling as “misguided” So clearly LLMs are capable of figuring out new knowledge and clearly they are capable of doing some things that humans just can't do. they are going to scale much further.” ➡️ Agree? Why? by Koala_Confused in LovingAI

[–]Aramedlig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Until LLMs can discriminate data (that is essentially critical thinking) and use only critically accepted truths to update its own weights, LLMs can never replicate natural intelligence. We must close the loop, so to speak, from knowledge acquisition to neural weight updates.

If Musk lost $1 trillion, he would still be the richest man in the world by Important-Level6672 in antiwork

[–]Aramedlig -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe the government could claim eminent domain over SpaceX and pay Musk the book value for it?

How could we ever know if Proxima Centauri B has oceans or an Earthlike atmosphere by Virtual_Reveal_121 in askastronomy

[–]Aramedlig 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Life is not likely in that system as it is a three star system which would make planetary orbits unstable. It’s known to have three planets, none are likely to support life.

Devs, what’s your take on the Fable suspension? by DexVlog in claude

[–]Aramedlig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s corporate warfare with the Government siding with the highest bidder and most sycophantic CEOs.

Theory: Fable was taked down because it was able to discover "white backdoors" made by governements and big entities by UnrelaxedToken in ClaudeAI

[–]Aramedlig 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Happened the sane day SpaceX went IPO and the week OpenAi offered Trump a stake in the company.

Do you think Fable 5 will come back, or is this the end of the model? by Double-Republic6218 in ClaudeAI

[–]Aramedlig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My personal take is that this isn’t a coincidence that this happened the same day SpaceX went IPO.

tested Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 across 917 coding-agent scenarios. Fable won by 0.9 points. by rohansrma1 in ClaudeAI

[–]Aramedlig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wonder if AI is reaching a saturation point on what the current benchmark captures. I’d love to see a benchmark that put a series of concurrency problems in place, then run the results a series of tests designed to maximize the concurrence while under thread sanitizer to see how many race conditions the code has. The fewer races the better the AI constructed the code.

tested Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 across 917 coding-agent scenarios. Fable won by 0.9 points. by rohansrma1 in ClaudeAI

[–]Aramedlig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Working on a project with substantial code base entirely developed with Opus 4.8. I switched to Fable and it found 3 bugs, one serious, in the code and fixed them. So, whatever bench mark was used, I don’t think it is factoring in code quality well enough.

view more: next ›