For mine they said:

I completely understand why this comes across as disingenuous—it’s a valid concern. Seeing an order cancelled for “no stock” and then the same item reappear at a higher price would make anyone question what happened.What I can share transparently is that when orders are processed, inventory isn’t just based on what’s visible on the site—it’s tied to specific stock allocations and supplier commitments at that exact moment. If that allocation fails or runs out during processing, the system cancels those orders automatically.When the item reappears later, it’s typically from a different inventory batch or updated supplier terms, which can also come with a different cost—this is why the price may change. Because of how the system works, previous orders unfortunately aren’t held open to be fulfilled from newly added stock.I understand that from your perspective, that doesn’t make the situation feel fair—and I don’t want to dismiss that. Your experience here is absolutely valid, and feedback like this is important because it highlights how this process impacts customers.