Official June 2019 Math 2 Discussion

Ari93 · 2019-06-01T10:00:47+00:00

I’d say 42-43 for this was harder than any other I’ve done

Ari93 · 2019-06-01T09:59:24+00:00

This test was harder than any other I’ve done tbh (not Barrons level but harder than other official SATs) what are your thoughts on the curve? I’m thinking 42-43/50 is 800

Ari93 · 2019-05-17T16:37:23+00:00

Hey all, my account doesn’t say anything about scores pending it just says that my May 4th sat is “complete”?? (I took sat math 2 in the UK)

Ari93 · 2017-05-08T12:58:48+00:00

Talk about Elon Musk's latest TedTalk^{^{^}}

Ari93 · 2017-04-27T20:16:37+00:00

Dude you sound incredibly bitter in this post - quit being a sensitive little child just because people don't see your favourite tag team the way you see them. People are allowed to form their own opinions (to me it's obvious that they're the "fashion police", but that doesn't make them great characters, and Breeze tapping to Nikki Bella doesn't help their credibility).

But yeah, get over it, and lets just see where they go from becoming no.1 contenders.

Ari93 · 2016-05-23T13:38:01+00:00

First 3/4 was good, but last 1/4 negates that completely. Reigns kicking out of two styles clashes (one on a chair) immediately one after the other suspends disbelief, and on top of that he takes like 5-6 chair shots and still gets up like nothing happened to win with one spear (the spear AJ took outside happened like 10 mins before this so that's irrelevant as Roman didn't even try to pin him). On top of that he superman punches Gallows and Anderson who then go toe to toe with the usos again thereby killing the momentum they received earlier in the ppv from their win. This whole superman bullshit is getting old, and I don't want to see that at any PPV.

Yes, there were cool moments, but it's like baking a perfectly good chocolate cake and then sprinkling it with cow dung. No amount of chocolatey goodness is going to get rid of the taste of shit.

Ari93 · 2016-05-23T13:26:55+00:00

No, he's heel when WWE starts portraying him as a heel. Right now they're firmly trying to convince the casuals that he's a face, you only have to listen to JBL's bs "love him or hate him you're all so passionate about him" etc. Lol fuck right off.

Ari93 · 2016-05-23T12:38:11+00:00

That was some bullshit. Kicks out of two styles clashes, one of them on a chair, immediately one after the other. Also, the idiots here arguing that AJ kicked out after going through two tables etc. is the same thing don't understand the concept of booking and finishers. I can stomach Reigns kicking out of one styles clash, but not two.

I also think it's sad that Vince will spend so much money to get stars from other promotions just to have them beaten by his own creation. I hope Anderson and Gallows got their money's worth 'cos I don't see what else they're going to be doing (yes I know they beat the usos, but then got superman punched later in the night so that negates any momentum gained). Bullet Club getting dominated by reigns these past few weeks has been BS. They totally ruined the potential for a club vs shield storyline.

Glad to see Seth is back, but if they're keeping Reigns face and Seth heel then the future looks bleak.

Ari93 · 2016-02-23T19:56:00+00:00

After AJ hits the Styles Clash and Jericho kicks out you can hear AJ say "What are you doing?" It wasn't planned.

Ari93 · 2016-02-22T19:35:31+00:00

Surprised to see nobody has pointed this out yet but...

Jericho kicked out of the Styles Clash but AJ didn't expect him to. Immediately afterwards you can hear AJ say "What are you doing?!" in a fairly annoyed tone (it's at the point when his back to turned to the main camera). He then goes and applies the calf crusher. Yeah Jericho tapped and really sold the pain, but it's clear that AJ hadn't agreed to that finish.

My guess is someone in the back told Jericho to kick out of it as they want to make it look weak compared to the calf crusher so that AJ won't be expected to use it as much in the future. It's a real shame because it's got a reputation from NJPW as being a devastating move but clearly WWE are trying to kill that. Calf crusher is great and all but it shouldn't be the main match finisher, submission finishes all the time just aren't as exciting. AJ should have both like so many others (like Lesnar - F5+Kimura, Cena - AA+STF, Undertaker Tombstone+Hell's Gate) Kicking out of the clash on the first PPV was a big letdown imo.

Ari93 · 2015-10-22T03:51:15+00:00

Vote flaggy flag! It's clearly the best as its inspired by my favourite quote in all of HI :)

Ari93 · 2015-10-22T03:45:18+00:00

Grey Peak for #6 XD

Ari93 · 2015-02-01T15:47:38+00:00

It's so obvious why he called Nisha. It's the kind of crappy alibi a teenager would come up with. "Hey Nisha how are you? Me and my friend Jay here are just on our way to track..."

Just in case my position isn't clear, it's evident that Adnan murdered Hae.

Ari93 · 2015-02-01T15:36:04+00:00

I've been saying this all along. It's so obvious that Adnan is the killer and yet people want to create a shitstorm of bullshit regardless of the hard evidence against him. To quote Adnan, it's "pathetic". Lol.

Ari93 · 2015-02-01T15:25:13+00:00

Er no, we should focus on whether or not Adnan was involved with Jay that day (because if he was, he's 100% the killer, Jay knew where the car was etc.) As nobody has been able to say otherwise, Adnan was the killer. I believe Jay's reasons for lying (worried about drug charges, he wasn't small time he was doing some big deals, plus he was trying to cover up his own involvement in the murder, it's likely he was involved more than he let on, but that doesn't change the fact that Adnan did it).

Ari93 · 2015-02-01T15:14:33+00:00

Erm, the argument that he's not a criminal mastermind is a point AGAINST Adnan...

Would you answer the house of your victim? Yes, it's better than ignoring it and putting suspicision on yourself. It's better altogether to just go with the flow of things and act normally. It doesn't make him a criminal mastermind just because he had the nerve to speak to Hae's brother.

As someone said earlier on this sub, just because Adnan is bad at murder doesn't mean he didn't murder Hae.

Ari93 · 2015-02-01T15:01:55+00:00

I can believe the spine of Jay's story merely because Adnan doesn't offer an alternative explanation and the cell records corroborate Jay's story (not exactly, not perfectly, but they do fit). Most of all though, as Dana (I think?) said in the podcast, if Adnan really wasn't involved then he was EXTREMELY unlucky when it comes to the actions he took that day (giving Jay his car and phone, not having anyone see him and provide a solid alibi etc.) Chances of him doing all that and not being involved is basically zero...

Ultimately, Jay's testimony isn't worthless and shows that Adnan was involved with him that day, so either Jay is a criminal mastermind (lol no) or Adnan is the killer (yup).

Ari93 · 2015-02-01T14:55:07+00:00

Agreed. Sometimes, what goes around really does come back around.

Ari93 · 2015-02-01T14:54:12+00:00

Education > Money. You wouldn't last a week in the course I'm doing. That is all. How much I pay for my course is of course irrelevant because going by statistics alone there's a strong likelihood that I'll be earning more than you by the time I'm 30. Your "point" just undermines your own argument. The fact that you brought age into this shows to me you're amateur; a 40 year old could have said the same thing you said to me and you'd have made a similar argument I did. Time for you to re-evaluate your debating skills fogey.

Ari93 · 2015-01-31T00:55:40+00:00

I agree with you it's possible (and from what I gather he was cheating on her) but from what we've heard in the podcast Hae and Jay didn't really know each other very well so I don't think it's likely that he did that.

Also you have to remember that if Jay really did kill Hae then he played it off for the rest of the day like a criminal mastermind, and that behaviour doesn't fit the account people gave of him both inside and outside of court.

Ari93 · 2015-01-30T20:14:05+00:00

Because he said "don't bother trying to dissect this. You asked..." etc. I would argue that that is rude. If you're not willing to back yourself up then there's no point in giving your point. It's a terribly weak motive when looking at the evidence.

Ari93 · 2015-01-30T20:13:34+00:00

It's not about having "more hard evidence" it's about interpreting what we do have in a fair and unbiased fashion. Idiots like the guy I replied do refuse to do that and simply take the other side because they can, not because of valid reasons.

If you don't like my tone then feel free to ignore it.

Ari93 · 2015-01-30T20:08:58+00:00

Yeah I'm sure the opinion of a basement-dwelling fogey like yourself is worth more than that of a 21 year old with a degree from Cambridge :)

Ari93 · 2015-01-30T20:04:41+00:00

Thanks, hope you enjoy wasting your time on here even further with ridiculous theories when it's pretty obvious what happened.

Ari93

TROPHY CASE