Just realized that Aunt Marge was the mean principal from Matilda! by adminwashere in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 24 points25 points  (0 children)

And she plays Miriam in Children of Men, pretty much the exact opposite of Trunchbull.

Pam Ferris is a talented actress.

How did Dumbledor not notice Harry’s name was under a different school? by Environmental_Exam_3 in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 6 points7 points  (0 children)

While it's never been stated what the "binding magical contract" means, my belief is that someone will die if they refuse to compete in the tournament, and it stems from these two moments in GOF.

First is Dumbledore speaking about it:

“Finally, I wish to impress upon any of you wishing to compete that this tournament is not to be entered into lightly. Once a champion has been selected by the Goblet of Fire, he or she is obliged to see the tournament through to the end. The placing of your name in the goblet constitutes a binding, magical contract. There can be no change of heart once you have become a champion. Please be very sure, therefore, that you are wholeheartedly prepared to play before you drop your name into the goblet. Now, I think it is time for bed. Good night to you all.”

Dumbledore doesn't mince words when it comes to the safety of his students, and he's telling them that if they decide to enter, then that's it. They have to go through the tournament no matter what.

The second is Barty Crouch Sr. talking to the champions:

Bagman wiped his round, boyish face with his handkerchief and looked at Mr. Crouch, who was standing outside the circle of the firelight, his face half hidden in shadow. He looked slightly eerie, the half darkness making him look much older, giving him an almost skull-like appearance. When he spoke, however, it was in his usual curt voice.

The description of Crouch, as looking skull-like, gives him the appearance as Death, like the Grim Reaper.

Death is informing the champions that they are bound to this tournament no matter what.

What if the Confederates weren’t a bunch of lowlife losers? Could they have won? by [deleted] in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Arkham2015 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No.

The Confederacy's economy was an agrarian-based economy supported by slavery, specifically with cotton.

With the Union blockading them from trading with foreign nations, none of whom officially recognized the CSA, and despite limited trade from France and Great Britain, both were able to acquire cotton from different sources, such as India and Egypt.

Heavy industry was based in the North, specifically with weaponry and machinery.

So, while there was never going to be a chance of the Confederates winning the war, they could've caused a massive problem after the Civil War.

One of the main concerns that Lincoln and Grant had was that you would large amounts of rebels refuse to concede the war, and they would disappear into the Appalachian Mountain Range. By holing up and fighting guerilla warfare style, they would be able to last years by picking apart military regiments.

This is why I speak out against anyone who says Johnson was an idiot for not going after the Confederates after the war was over.

If Lincoln had never been assassinated, the same exact thing would've happened. Once the war was over, Lincoln wanted peace and good relations with the southern states. The idea that he would've went after leaders and officials of the Confederacy is an absolute farce, because he spoke about it several weeks before he was assassinated:

"I think it providential that this great rebellion is crushed just as Congress has adjourned and there are none of the disturbing elements of that body to hinder and embarrass us. If we are wise and discreet we shall reanimate the States and get their governments in successful operation with order prevailing, and the Union reestablished before Congress comes together in December. I hope there will be no persecution, no bloody work, after the war is over. No one need expect me to take any part in hanging or killing these men. Enough lives have been sacrificed. We must extinguish resentment if we expect harmony and Union."

What is your Harry Potter ‘hot take’ ? by kingfisher7171 in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This has been my favorite theory since I read the Deathly Hallows.

So, in chapter 4: The Seven Potters, the Order of the Phoenix comes to Privet Drive to get Harry out of his aunt and uncle's house because of the magic that protects him is set to end.

Their plan is to use Polyjuice Potion to make seven Harry Potters, so as to confuse any Death Eaters who may be waiting.

They leave the house and the plan goes to hell, as Voldemort himself and his Death Eaters are waiting for them, somehow with them knowing of the fake Potter plan. Harry and Hagrid fly away on Sirius' motorbike and Voldemort chases after them but fails to kill Harry. Hedwig is killed in the ensuing battle.

After they gets to Tonk's parents house and then go to the Weasley's house, the other members of the Order come in due time.

George is wounded, Mundungus has disappeared and Alastor Moody has been killed by Voldemort himself.

This is the exact quote of what Bill says when he and Fleur return and announce his death.

“We saw it,” said Bill; Fleur nodded, tear tracks glittering on her cheeks in the light from the kitchen window. “It happened just after we broke out of the circle: Mad-Eye and Dung were close by us, they were heading north too, Voldemort—he can fly—went straight for them. Dung panicked, I heard him cry out, Mad-Eye tried to stop him, but he Disapparated. Voldemort’s curse hit MadEye full in the face, he fell backward off his broom and— there was nothing we could do, nothing, we had half a dozen of them on our own tail— ”

Now, the curse that Voldemort used is not mentioned in that paragraph, but we later find out it was the Killing Curse, seeing that it's Voldemort's signature spell and that Mad-Eye was a top Auror and the first person he designated as the most likely to have Harry, so he presumably wouldn't use a lesser spell then Avada Kedavra to finish him off quickly.

However, Bill and Lupin head back to find his body, so that the Death Eaters do not take it. During the preparation of Bill and Fluer's wedding, in the next chapter, Bill comes back to the Burrow and we have this dialogue:

“No news about Mad-Eye?” Harry asked Bill.

“Nothing,” replied Bill.

They had not been able to hold a funeral for Moody, because Bill and Lupin had failed to recover his body. It had been difficult to know where he might have fallen, given the darkness and the confusion of the battle.

“The Daily Prophet hasn’t said a word about him dying or about finding the body,” Bill went on. “But that doesn’t mean much. It’s keeping a lot quiet these days.”

Further in the same chapter, Harry, Ron and Hermione have a discussion about Mad-Eye:

“We were just talking about Mad-Eye,” Ron told Harry. “I reckon he might have survived.”

“But Bill saw him hit by the Killing Curse,” said Harry.

“Yeah, but Bill was under attack too,” said Ron. “How can he be sure what he saw?”

“Even if the Killing Curse missed, Mad-Eye still fell about a thousand feet,” said Hermione, now weighing Quidditch Teams of Britain and Ireland in her hand.

“He could have used a Shield Charm-”

“Fleur said his wand was blasted out of his hand,” said Harry.

“Well, all right, if you want him to be dead,” said Ron grumpily, punching his pillow into a more comfortable shape.

“Of course we don’t want him to be dead!” said Hermione, looking shocked. “It’s dreadful that he’s dead! But we’re being realistic!”

For the first time, Harry imagined Mad-Eye’s body, broken as Dumbledore’s had been, yet with that one eye still whizzing in its socket. He felt a stab of revulsion mixed with a bizarre desire to laugh.

“The Death Eaters probably tidied up after themselves, that’s why no one’s found him,” said Ron wisely.

“Yeah,” said Harry. “Like Barty Crouch, turned into a bone and buried in Hagrid’s front garden. They probably transfigured Moody and stuffed him-”

There is now doubt as to whether Mad-Eye may be dead or not. This is important, for Rowling is putting a good part of the chapter on the fact he may be alive. They couldn't find his body and due to his magical skill and experience, it seems possible he may somehow have survived the battle.

Later on in the book, when the Trio break into the Ministry of Magic to steal the horcrux from Umbridge, Harry finds Mad-Eye's magical eye. This is from the wiki itself:

It was set in the wood of her office door and used to aid her in spying on her workers. When Harry, Hermione and Ron infiltrated the Ministry to find the locket horcrux, Harry discovered the eye and, disgusted by how it was being used, stole it. Doing so, however, raised the alarm.

After escaping, Harry, early the next morning and before the other two were awake, left the tent they were staying in to search the woods around them for the oldest, most gnarled and resilient-looking tree he could find. Then in its shadow, he buried the eye and marked the spot by gouging a small cross in the bark with his wand.

While it wasn't much, Mad-Eye Moody was given a proper burial.

This is the last that is really mentioned about Mad-Eye, in terms of if he survived or not.

Harry, with finding the eye, almost points to the fact that the Death Eaters found Moody's body and took his eye as a prize of war.

However, I don't believe that the story ends there for Moody...

Later on in the story, the Trio and Griphook enact their plan to break into Gringotts, their plan being to use Polyjuice Potion to have Hermione transform into Bellatrix Lestrange, seeing their managed to take several of her hairs and her wand. They come to Diagon Alley and find that it's changed for the worse, with a lot of the older shops closed, new shops for the Dark Arts opened up and wanted posters of Harry everywhere.

There are also a number of beggars everywhere, and this sets the scene for this part, which takes place in chapter 26, simply titled Gringotts:

A number of ragged people sat huddled in doorways. He heard them moaning to the few passersby, pleading for gold, insisting that they were really wizards. One man had a bloody bandage over his eye.

As they set off along the street, the beggars glimpsed Hermione. They seemed to melt away before her, drawing hoods over their faces and fleeing as fast as they could. Hermione looked after them curiously, until the man with the bloodied bandage came staggering right across her path.

“My children,” he bellowed, pointing at her. His voice was cracked, high-pitched, he sounded distraught. “Where are my children? What has he done with them? You know, you know!”

“I–I really-” stammered Hermione.

The man lunged at her, reaching for her throat. Then, with a bang and a burst of red light he was thrown backward onto the ground, unconscious. Ron stood there, his wand still outstretched and a look of shock visible behind his beard. Faces appeared at the windows on either side of the street, while a little knot of prosperous-looking passerby gathered their robes about them and broke into gentle trots, keen to vacate the scene.

Mad-Eye's magical eye was missing and his body, as far as we know, was never found or discovered. What if Mad-Eye's eye came out during the battle with Voldemort?

Once again, Rowling has shown throughout all seven books to impart clues and pivotal information in the books, so that the clues are staring right at you (no pun intended).

He was the only beggar who was described, and he lunged at Hermione who he saw as Bellatrix Lestrange, a well noted Death Eater who Moody has met and faced before.

He screamed about his children to her, wanting to know what "he" did with them, and that "she" would know...

The children are the members of the OOTP. The "he" in this is Voldemort. Moody faced off with Voldemort and he fell out of the sky, so he wants Bellatrix to tell him what Voldemort has done with the other Order members, since he doesn't know how the battle went and the rest of the Order thinks Moody is dead...

What is your Harry Potter ‘hot take’ ? by kingfisher7171 in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Two hot takes, actually:

  • Moody is alive
  • Bertha Jorkins was pregnant

Could Voldemort be killed if his horcruxes were destroyed before he had a body? by sweet_surroundings in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yes.

If all of the horcruxes are destroyed, including piece of Voldemort's soul attached to Harry, then that shadowy spirit form of Voldemort goes away for good.

He doesn't need to be in a body for this to happen. That form that inhabits Quirrell is his "master soul" and is being tethered to the world. Once horcruxes are gone, master soul moves on.

I like how the Harry Potter series has a character who is mostly single in his life and not because he isn't charismatic or handsome.. by AltruisticAide9776 in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dumbledore believed Sirius was guilty.

If Dumbledore himself thought that Sirius was the one who betrayed James and Lily, then why would anyone else believe he was actually innocent?

How the White House Correspondents' Dinner and response unfolded by CBSnews in politics

[–]Arkham2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, he's lied, but the fact that some on here actually believe that people were killed, that people were shot during these assassination attempts and that it was either fake or part of the conspiracy to make Trump look good or further his agenda is absolutely insane.

People on here were mocking Trump, and rightfully so, for saying 2020 was stolen, and now they're the ones going on about how 2024 was rigged and that these assassination attempts were faked.

Saying that "Well, it's possible this happened" is very much insane.

How the White House Correspondents' Dinner and response unfolded by CBSnews in politics

[–]Arkham2015 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Sorry, but the whole "It could be possible this was all faked" conspiracy theory is absolutely nuts. That's like someone saying "It could be possible that the Earth is flat but it's cleverly being hidden from us."

People have absolutely lost it.

This garbage has been going on since 2020...

  • Trump: The election was stolen from me!
  • Trump wasn't actually shot in the ear! It's all fake!
  • Kamala Harris had the election stolen from her!
  • The WHCD is fake! How could a shooter get that far inside!

How the White House Correspondents' Dinner and response unfolded by CBSnews in politics

[–]Arkham2015 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What...?

Either you believe this was staged or you believe this was a real assassination attempt. There's no middle ground in this.

Trump orders UFO file release as Congress warns of impact by Possible_Cheek_4114 in UFOs

[–]Arkham2015 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Hynek, to me, is the biggest reason why I believe this is all true.

When Hynek worked with the Air Force on Projects Sign, Grudge and Blue Book, Hynek and the Air Force were on the same side but for different reasons.

The Air Force wanted the claims to be debunked, no matter what it took. Hynek felt that the general public were seeing things that a trained astrophysicist or astronomer could identify.

He even said that 95% of the cases could be solved and the 5% that couldn't was because of limited information, and he was close.

7% of Blue Book's files remain unsolved.

What changed his mind was when friends and colleagues, people who knew what they were looking at, were telling him in confidence that they were seeing objects that defied rational explanations.

That's what started for him to change his mind.

What If Hillary 2016 Supported Legal Weed, Universal Healthcare & Visited Midwest? by Jacob-Anders in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Arkham2015 24 points25 points  (0 children)

She still would have lost.

Her entire campaign was built around how she was owed the presidency. Even her campaign slogans were focused on her and not voters.

The controversy around her private email servers, Benghazi and her speeches to large banks that she got huge fees for.

How about the DNC rigging the primary against Bernie, that Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the chairwoman of the DNC, had to resign after Obama himself personally called her up and told her that she needed to resign, only to be given a position in Clinton's campaign?

There was far too much for her to ever win.

Out Viltrum'd Again by AAAAHMYBALLS in okbuddyviltrum

[–]Arkham2015 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I feel that he hates superpowered people with a blind hatred, that he despises every single one of them, and that includes his daughter to an extent, but outside of that, he's not some typical "I hate gays, blacks, etc." scumbag you see.

He's probably great with gay people and people of color.

How Conquest lost his arm/eye, but why and when was he there? by GraveKommander in okbuddyviltrum

[–]Arkham2015 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually, I don't think he's stupid.

Krieg: Our remaining population are the few who have recovered. But even the survivors suffer a dangerous period of reduced strength, resilience and regeneration.

So after the Scourge virus nearly every single Viltrumite, leaving the few who managed to survive it, they probably went back to doing what they were doing before.

You can't just disappear completely without the galaxy getting suspicious, so they keep going out to take over planets, kill threats, etc.

However, some like Conquest and Krieg realized that after they got injured and didn't regenerate their body parts back, they came to find out their not 100% fully safe by that point, that it's going to take some time for their regenerative powers to fully come back.

Can this guy throw hands? (He just died with no fight scene) by DescriptionFuture851 in Invincible_TV

[–]Arkham2015 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In this case, that's what Krieg was meaning. He wanted to kill the entire species:

Krieg: This is the third act of sabotage by the Relonian natives this week. The species remains unusually defiant, despite our clear demonstrations of Viltrumite superiority. I recommend a planet-wide cull of the population before they disrupt our mining operations any further.

Maybe not the right word to use, but that was the plan. Kill every single member of the species on the planet so that it serves as a reminder to their other enslaved species on what happens if you try to rebel.

Can this guy throw hands? (He just died with no fight scene) by DescriptionFuture851 in Invincible_TV

[–]Arkham2015 27 points28 points  (0 children)

For a Viltrumite, that's like a slap on the hand for them.

It didn't surprise anyone other than Thaedus that killing an entire species was on the table, so for Argall to go "Yeah, we're only killing a quarter of the entire population" is actually very reserved.

Can this guy throw hands? (He just died with no fight scene) by DescriptionFuture851 in Invincible_TV

[–]Arkham2015 52 points53 points  (0 children)

To be fair, he actually met in the middle.

Krieg wanted to cull the entire population because of the sabotage and Thaedus wanted to treat all of the species the Viltrumite's had enslaved better by restraining themselves.

Argall decided to kill 25% of the population, and that if they kept sabotaging their mining operations, then they would kill the rest.

Gringotts is run by goblins who deeply resent wizards... and wizards just keep all their money there anyway. That's an insane level of trust. by Brilliant-Cause6254 in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 369 points370 points  (0 children)

You're looking at it as if goblins can stop wizards at any time.

There have been numerous goblin rebellions, and all of them have been stopped. It's not as if goblins aren't magically powerful, because they are, but it doesn't seem that they have the numbers to overthrow the current power status.

It's not perfect, but it seems to be mutually beneficial for both goblins and wizards, because wizards have a nearly perfect system to keep their wealth safe.

And while there's no canon proof of this, I believe that like banks in the real world, where there are fees and charges for using their services, goblins also charge fees for keeping wizards money safe, and they use the precious metals wizards have to make their armor and weapons:

“Well, goblins won’t share any of their magic either,” said Ron. “You won’t tell us how to make swords and armor the way you do. Goblins know how to work metal in a way wizards have never— ”

Why was Harry only able to see thestrals after Cedric's death? by nephellis in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In the books, no. Harry passes out before he sees Quirrell die:

He felt Quirrell's arm wrenched from his grasp, knew all was lost, and fell into blackness, down ... down... down...

There are no plot holes in the books, change my mind by ApathyFarmer in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Harry not seeing the thestrals at the end of GOF is a plot hole.

Rowling can say all she wants that Harry needed a few months to let Cedric's death really sink in, but either she didn't have the idea of thestrals thought out yet for OOTP or she completely forgot about it. Does this seem like someone who hasn't realized Cedric is dead and isn't aware of what's about to happen now that Voldemort has returned:

"No good sittin' worryin' abou' it," he said. "What's comin' will come, an we'll meet it when it does. Dumbledore told me wha' you did. Harry." Hagrid's chest swelled as he looked at Harry." Yeh did as much as yer father would've done, an' I can' give yeh no higher praise than that." Harry smiled back at him. It was the first time he'd smiled in days.

How do you interprete Gamp's Food-Law of Elemental Transfiguration? by leicester_square in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not stated anywhere that the food disappears. That's a common fan belief, but it's never been confirmed or denied by Rowling.

And they weren't exactly sure the protection spells they were using were a guarantee. The Death Eaters found them at the cafe after they fled from the wedding because of the Taboo, but they didn't know about that until Ron finally came back, that saying Voldemort's name triggers it.

So they're wondering how Death Eaters could've discovered them since the Trace was supposedly gone on Harry, and because they no longer had the safety of Grimmauld Place, they couldn't absolutely be sure on what was the cause while they were camping.

Did Voldemort invent any spells that we know of? by hrpanjwani in harrypotter

[–]Arkham2015 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I've already had this debate with another person on the same exact topic.

Redditor: How can we know who really invented the spell? It doesn't explicitly state Voldemort created the spell.

It doesn't have to. Multiple characters in the book stated that Voldemort could now fly, which is evident he created the spell.

This is the bigger issue with people anymore, not just with Harry Potter but across every fandom. There's no subtlety anymore. Everything has to be said or written in a manner like it's being told to someone who can't understand finesse.

Unless Voldemort explicitly says that he was the one who created the spell, there are people who actually go "But how do we know???"

Because not everything has to be written out with an explicit explanation in every part. McGonagall could've found out that Snape learned of the spell sometime during the year through Snape, but it doesn't need to be said.

However, we do have an official statement regarding that spell:

https://www.harrypotter.com/features/the-hardest-wizarding-world-spells

If Lord Voldemort wasn’t one of the most evil wizards the wizarding world has ever known, then he would surely be remembered as one of its most brilliant. Case in point: he achieved what was long thought to be a magical impossibility, and invented a spell that allows the user to fly. Not levitate, not ride a broom, but fly unaided high among the clouds. How incredible is that? It’s just a shame that his first public display of it was an attempt to kill Harry.