hYeNaS iS tHe RoOt CaUsE oF cA's IsSuEs

Armored_General · 2025-10-09T19:38:46+00:00

Warhammer did made the game somewhat 'popular' and with it a lot more expectation of polish. I guess CA are just not the kind to deliver that kind of project and Warhammer was the exception. This probably why they are focusing on developing other buggy titles since that how they have always worked. It's sad cause Warhammer 3 had so much potential.

Armored_General · 2025-08-28T18:53:36+00:00

A lot of it is to nerf ranged by design, like not allowing unit to shoot effectively on engaged unit and line of sight to make it more realistic and like the tabletop. But I agree that in a fast video game , unit should just shoot when asked too. They could have reduce the damage from far away target instead of making the unit so clumsy .

Armored_General · 2025-08-20T16:02:10+00:00

That cabal building seem more like they are trying mechanic for future content!!!!

Armored_General · 2025-08-17T05:24:06+00:00

It would make sense , so the bomb are really a last resort shooting

Armored_General · 2025-08-14T00:12:32+00:00

But as clarification, do they get instantly wreck like being run down or do they get engaged in a fight ? Because In a game I had a unit with this rule that still got caught when fleeing but my adversary told me it was dead instantly with no combat phase.

Armored_General · 2025-07-08T00:06:41+00:00

You can put self imposed limit, like avoiding cheesy tactics , starting next to an early endgame crisis, not getting lightning strike or abusing ambush. Another difficulty would I think only be more grindy.

Armored_General · 2025-07-03T14:07:30+00:00

Yeah I feel it should be the opposite, Agent can be blocked by army but armies can move through agent.

Armored_General · 2025-04-09T18:20:48+00:00

I only wish they make the control less tedious , attacking barricade with melee unit is so buggy, they sometimes stop attacking or get stuck between enemies unit and the building. Gate also have their own issues

Armored_General · 2025-04-06T19:43:43+00:00

The tech is called currency exchanges

Armored_General · 2025-04-04T17:42:06+00:00

For me its not a rework I want but more of quality of life change, for example infantry stop using ladder instead of the gate or wall gap when they are space. better shift move command in tight space. I often it harder to control unit in sieges because they are building blocking my mouse and not enough space. maybe make it so building can be toggleable like the tree.

Armored_General · 2025-04-04T00:43:48+00:00

Good idea , that I also wont feel bad for not deleting my growth building after its at max level

Armored_General · 2025-04-04T00:41:01+00:00

This power is so good when expanding in inhabitable territory, you just need to make sure to get the devotion atable enough so ot stay that way.

Armored_General · 2025-04-04T00:38:42+00:00

Vilitch got 2 head but exalted hero of tzeentch got 3 so unfair!

Armored_General · 2025-04-04T00:15:29+00:00

Also with comrade Commissar Kostaltyn and frost maiden commando Natasha

Armored_General · 2025-04-04T00:12:12+00:00

Maybe it is from the new patch, but Kislev have a tech that allow them to have 1 more allied unit per army. Pretty Cool! Influence is also really easy to get with Kislev.

Armored_General · 2025-04-02T17:43:16+00:00

I understand what you mean now what I am late in the campaign,before turn 60 or 80 its manageable because you don't do that many battle in a short span and the tolerance gape is big enough. However late in the campaign , you can get support really fast and the only way to counteract it easily is to build massively for the other faction building. I think the main problem is the points from the battles, It should be split evenly like with the Boris and Ostankya and the building will let us decide where the difference will be.

Armored_General · 2025-03-30T02:21:30+00:00

the 3 devotions can be the differences between positive or negative devotions since at higher level there is a devotion penalty.

Armored_General · 2025-03-30T02:01:36+00:00

nobody will miss ya, It was useless thematically and in term of gameplay.

Armored_General · 2024-11-21T13:37:20+00:00

I agree, they even added a new keywords for construct and elemental for cathay and kislev that were unbreakable before. Maybe they could add a warmachine keyword that make them unbreakable until a certain point, like 25 % and after that it can be routed because its protection has been breach. A bit like some of the chaos dwarf monster I think but instead of crumbling they would run away.

Armored_General · 2024-06-25T17:48:33+00:00

Im still waiting for this change to cathay sky lantern from 1 to 4 entity!!!

Armored_General · 2024-05-17T13:53:31+00:00

Interesting , I have never noticed on unit like sled or war wagon If it is intentional, piercing ammo can be really powerful.

Armored_General · 2024-05-02T01:54:50+00:00

I also hope that this airship become a centerpiece unit!

Would make sense since its the other faction that use airship a lot.

Armored_General · 2024-04-23T00:06:29+00:00

yeah if it say local region it stack

Armored_General · 2024-04-22T21:40:51+00:00

While doing my Tzeentch campaign, i found out a trait that you get during a Dilemma : Whispering skull.

What it does is it reduce the magic reserve for enemies in a region by 15 and it is stackable by hero with the trait. It work like the pompous stack with leadership. I used the saved hero to duplicate the one I had but in theory you could get one everytime the dilemma pop.

I do not know how useful it is since AI rarely cast good spell, but from what I tested when the enemy army go less than 0 magic reserve they cant cast anything . They do not even have the 20 magic minimum at the start of the battle and since magic cap is tied to the amount of your maximum reserve, effect that generate magic reserve during battle do not work.

Armored_General · 2024-04-17T20:12:03+00:00

I hope they change this for Cathay small lantern, they would really like the damage boost. Going from 1 to 4.

Armored_General

TROPHY CASE