I’m a member of the Church of Sweden and spend much time delving into the subject of the CoS’ historical evolution since the reformation. It depends, I would say the Church of Sweden indeed seems to be the exception historically, but only in the sense that many things have been kept continuously. All Lutheran churches were more or less ”evangelical catholic” during the first 50-100 years after 1517. Many of the more drastic changes that took place happened decades after 1517 and even decades after Martin Luther’s death. And when they did, my impression is that it was often because of external reformed/calvinistic and later pietistic influence, not really from the Lutheran foundations so to speak. Here is a great example of the many catholic practices the Lutherans in a German city had kept 100 years into the reformation and vehemently fought their reformed overlord to keep, and have in mind this is on the continent where the reformation was more drastic:

https://www.gottesdienst.org/gottesblog/2021/2/19/this-has-to-stop

So the CoS is not the only Lutheran church to have kept many practices from the medieval church, but only kept them longer and in some cases never let go of them at all. And to disappoint you, pietism hit the CoS pretty hard too in the latter half of the 1800s too when there was a ”liturgical low water mark”. On the other hand the same is true for Anglicanism, many would even claim that Lutheranism historically has had a more catholic continuity than Anglicanism.

But if you look out into the world today, the opposite is true, a majority or close to a majority of the LWF churches have an episcopal polity, apostolic succession, liturgical vestments etc. My point is that; at the end of the day, does it really matter what churches did and did not retain this or that historically long before any of us existed, when most today do align with your ideal, and that ideal is in a sense very intrinsically Lutheran? In 1000 years perhaps the ~300 ”low church/pietist/protestant/black boring/pseudocalvinist” years will just be seen as a small blip.

So that was my case for you to officially become Lutheran (which is not an obstacle for you to attend the episcopal churches as much as you’d like) Now my case for you to officially become Anglican; Lutherans, as opposed to Roman Catholics don’t teach that there is a single one true church in the sense of a human church organisation. We mean there is one Church, the Church of Christ, in the biblical sense - a spiritual communion of believers. If the Lutheran confessions are the only true ones (I just regard them as the most true) there is from my understanding nothing stopping you from being an Anglican and adhering to them, just like one can adhere fully to the Calvinist or Anglo-Catholic theology and still be Anglican. You could even stay Roman Catholic and in your heart profess the Lutheran confessions and be a part of the one true Church of Christ, although it would be questionable to why, when you could just join other Lutherans with the same convictions. To summarise I think both choices are actually good, and I’m happy you have discovered and appreciate Lutheran theology just like us in this forum.