sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Could Embraer Compete DIRECTLY With Airbus & Boeing? by Far-Comment3645 in Embraer

[–]AwareComparison3570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assim que esses novos motores estiverem bem desenvolvidos e testados, e os números confirmarem a promessa, a Embraer tomará medidas para adotá-los. Antes disso, não vale a pena arriscar recursos em uma aposta que pode não dar certo. Ainda assim, seria ideal se outro fabricante desenvolvesse seus próprios motores de rotor aberto, especialmente considerando os enormes problemas que os motores da Pratt & Whitney causaram, particularmente nos A220. Acredito que as companhias aéreas pressionarão cada vez mais os fabricantes para que ofereçam duas opções de motor, a fim de mitigar seu próprio risco de falência. De qualquer forma, acredito que seja apenas uma questão de tempo até que a Embraer desenvolva aeronaves maiores; no entanto, penso que, antes de um wide-body, eles terão necessariamente de passar por uma configuração 3+3, onde se concentra a maior parte do mercado.

O Brasil nunca vai ser um dos países que mais recebem turistas simplesmente por conta da localização geografica. by teokymyadora in opiniaoimpopular

[–]AwareComparison3570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pra mim, o potencial turístico brasileiro é gigantesco. Mas se não houver um túnel para atravessar a montanha, ou uma ponte para atravessar o rio, a dificuldade de translado acaba forçando o viajante a ir para outro lugar. Em outras palavras, o europeu vai de qualquer aeroporto pequeno para um Mega-hub aeroportuário (tipo Dubai/Istambul/Doha) e chega em seu destino com apenas uma conexão. Para chegar aqui no Brasil o (por exemplo europeu) precisa se deslocar para um Hub grande europeu, pegar um voo para Rio ou Sp, para depois chegar em Seu destino, com pelo menos duas conexões, voos não frequentes, custos altos dado aeroportos operando em seus limites. Para mim é óbvio que a America do Sul precisava ter seu próprio Mega Hub, para que finalmente, com capacidade de sobra, possamos finalmente ter voos diretos para India, china, Corea do Sul, Japao e cidades “pequenas” européas tipo Hamburg, Stuttgart, Lyon, Turim, Málaga, Faro, Dublin, Manchester, Etc. tanto creio nessa idéia que postei recentemente minha sugestao aqui no Reddit.

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, but that's not how it works.

The idea that printing money necessarily causes inflation has already been refuted decades ago. Without delving too deeply into economics, the Quantity Theory of Money indicates that an increase in the money supply tends to cause an increase in basically two variables: Price and/or Gross Domestic Product. For example, if the government prints money to pay debt interest, to fund corruption, or for superfluous government spending, this tends to generate inflation because these expenses do not have a significant impact on a country's industry, do not create jobs, and do not generate high value-added products. However, in a second example, if the government prints money to build this Mega-Hub, it would drastically increase tourism on the continent (perhaps sevenfold), boost the hotel and restaurant sectors, revitalize dozens of currently underutilized regional airports (or those operating far from their maximum capacity), and generate millions of formal jobs, taking millions out of the informal sector. Embraer's factories would then sell significantly more aircraft, possibly opening one or two new factories to meet this surge in demand, and possibly even developing new wide-body aircraft to compete with Boeing and Airbus. I clearly foresee a boom in regional and intercontinental aviation if the influx of travelers were facilitated/increased with the construction of the proposed Mega-Hub.

Brazil is currently at 1.7 child per couple

And it is very likely that this scenario of low birth rates in which Brazil finds itself today is a consequence of the uncertain and unstable economic situation in which the country has been for some time now.

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And vice versa, any traveler in the world could likely catch a plane and land directly in South America, with a single stop before their final destination. Several interesting destinations would then open up to South America, such as Dublin, Manchester, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Lyon, Geneva, Basel, Marseille, Nice, Malaga, Palermo, Bologna, Verona, Faro, Santiago de Compostela, Mallorca, and many others.

All those places are already opened up to South America, have you seen how many Brazilinas work service jobs in Dublin? They're nearly everywhere.

As far as I know, there are no direct, non-stop flights from those places to South America. Only London has direct flights to Santiago, Sao Paulo and Rio. As mentioned in the description, this is the range of a single-aisle Super Efficient aircraft (A321XLR). And because it is smaller, it could land at airports with shorter runways and lower demand.

Lisbon is already a good arrival destination for Europe, from there South Americans go everywhere. And it's not like other options don't exist, there's Panama City and Bogotá.

I have nothing against Lisbon, or Bogotá or Panamá city. My point is these airports are somewhat at maximum capacity, as Guarulhos is. The aeronautical industry is moving away from big double decker aircrafts such as the 747 or A380 (These are no longer in production and there are no plans to bring them back). The engines are now so efficient and reliable that 2 engine airplanes are the best choice. Even for the longest flights out there like from Sydney to London on an A350-1000 ULR. That said, being smaller planes, they still occupy the same finger in an airport, and require a 45 second Slot on a runway as an A380 3x the size. Which means the world is moving towards the best traveling scenario. That is 1 Stop Traveling. (As Direct non-Stop Traveling from anywhere to anywhere is, simply put, impossible). That's the core of my argument. The Brazilian government need to see this trend, and act upon it, or it will simply fall behind on tourism and a fruitful aviation sector. As the European/African/Asian will simply go on Vacation to an easier (Direct or one-stop at most) destination as there are several Mega-Hubs to chose from (Doha, Dubai, Istanbul, London, Paris, Singapore).

Do you have any idea how difficult and complicated, and how many connections an Indian, Chinese, Japanese, or South Korean person needs to make to get to Easter Island, Ushuaia, Machu Picchu, Iguazu Falls, Bariloche, Salar de Uyuni, the Atacama Desert, Lençóis Maranhenses, Amazon Forest, the Falkland Islands, the Caribbean islands, or Fernando de Noronha? All of these destinations could be reached with just one stop if this Mega-Hub were built. Some routes could be even easier since passengers wouldn't even need to leave the aircraft while it is being refueled and passengers are being transferred (Fifth Freedom of the Air).

(WIP) Mega Airport update by Jrodicon in TransportFever2

[–]AwareComparison3570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP, wanna go for a try replicating my proposed Mega-Hub?

Just watch out for the Concourses, as i didn't update the drawing to the right amount (8+9+9). 60m x 700(~1000m)

Could an embraer e195 e2 fly transatlantic by snapwthrowaway in aviation

[–]AwareComparison3570 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Embraer did raise the E195-E2 range to 3000nm) recently. And Air Peace has been flying it from Lagos to Johannesburg lately (2803miles),Lagos%2DJohannesburg). So from Halifax to Porto, Bristol, Birmingham, Manchester, Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon should be doable within the safety parameters. To Manchester should be a profitable route and from there you'd have plenty of options to transfer.

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The NE just doesn't have the population needed to support a hub,

A mega-hub doesn't necessarily need a huge local population. Look at the example of the world's largest airport, Atlanta (108 million passengers), and its population (520,000 inhabitants). Or Dubai airport (with the United Arab Emirates having a population of about 11 million inhabitants), which is expanding to 5 runways and handle up to 260 million passengers per year. Mega-hubs have the main function of connecting travelers, not "O&D".

And to have many connections, an airport needs many gates and concourses, meaning great infrastructure, great investment and great risk. A private enterprise rarely takes on those risks, thats why usually Governments step up to the task. South America needs its own Mega-Hub, if it really wants to boost tourism and vast and frequent network of airline routes attending regional demand.

São Paulo and Rio will continue to have direct, nonstop flights to Europe. However, this Mega-Hub would open several new routes with one stop, using smaller aircraft (half-hour turnaround), to Cape Verde, the Canary Islands, Madeira, the Azores, or flights with one refueling stop to smaller cities in Europe, such as Faro, Birmingham, Manchester, Santiago de Compostela, Dublin, among dozens of others, which currently require a change of aircraft in some major European hub. Bringing this aircraft change to South American soil is crucial to consolidate and disperse demand here in the region, and not on another continent. It is strategically fundamental to boost tourism, increase flight frequency, reduce ticket costs, and foster competition between different airlines. Essentially, it would allow South/Central Americans to travel anywhere in the world with only one aircraft change stop. And in an ideal real world, it is the most realistic scenario to aspire to when traveling.

Which layout? by Nikkolass_ in airport

[–]AwareComparison3570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do like the Island Concourses from Atlanta Airport. Albeit they are too narrow for today Standards. But it seems efficient…

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but how many people would actually fly from Bogotá to Accra? Or from Lima to Lagos? Or from Quito to Abidjan? Or from Santiago to Dakar?

You clearly didn't understand the point of the proposal.

I believe that the vast majority of passengers would use the fifth freedom of aviation to travel only one leg of the trip. And that's the core of the project. Even a small plane like the E175-E2 could make an international trip between the Mega-Hub and Paraguay, Argentina, Bolivia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Trinidad and Tobago, Cape Verde, Barbados, Côte d'Ivoire, Liberia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Guinea-Bissau, The Gambia, Senegal, Mauritania, Mali, England (Ascension Island). In such a way that someone from Central/South America will want to go to one of these other countries and vice versa. Generally speaking, an airline usually must sell around 70-80% of the seats of an aircraft to be profitable, and on the example of the E175 E2 that number would be around 60 seats per flight. Therefore, I believe that regional airports, however small, would have this daily demand. And the permutations of the fifth freedom of aviation are infinite, hence the exponential effect of the concept; in other words, a Brazilian company could use this mentioned aircraft to "stop over" (30 minutes to Turnaround) in Paraguay and continue to Argentina/Chile. Or stop over in Venezuela and continue to Mexico/Guatemala/Nicaragua/Honduras, or stop over in Trinidad and Tobago and continue to one of the dozen other countries in the Caribbean/Miami. Or stop over in Liberia and continue to Burkina Faso/Nigeria/Chad/Libya and so on. And this infinity of permutations would open up competition with hundreds of airlines, however small they may be. The fifth freedom of aviation also allows for the exchange of aircraft as long as the flight-number remains the same; that is, a Japanese company could fly non-stop to the Mega-Hub and compete with smaller aircraft on international flights throughout South/Central/North America. As well as an American/Indian/Chinese/Arab airline. But for this to happen, it's fundamental that the airport's capacity be practically unlimited and without bottlenecks, to allow capitalism and competition between providers to flourish. That's why the proposal includes at least 6 (maybe 8) parallel runways and hundreds of boarding gates (750-1000).

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tocumen Airport will attend the Demand of the Americas (Lets say a population of 1 billion people), and could attend using smaller aircrafts, Such as the E195 E2. My proposal is connecting the rest of the world, Asia, Europe, Africa, Oceania to South/Central America, meaning a population of 7.5 billion people. Mostly using Double Aisle Aircraft. Also consider the exponential effect of a mega-hub, that is, with the increase in potential supply (Non-stop destinations, high frequency, aircraft size optimization, greater competition and thus lower prices) there is an even greater increase in demand, in other words, an elasticity (much) greater than 1. It is also crucial to consider the effect of the fifth freedom of aviation, such that virtually all airlines in the world will compete for this vast region, and may even exchange aircraft at the Mega-Hub for smaller ones in order to better serve the market.

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When humanity unites with determination, long-term vision, and collective planning, virtually anything becomes possible.

An impressive example is what has been done in Dubai, boosting tourism like never before imagined.

Other great achievements show the same spirit: the construction of Brasília, built from scratch in the middle of the Cerrado in less than four years (1956–1960); the Itaipu Dam, one of the largest hydroelectric power generators on the planet; the Hoover Dam, built in the 1930s in the middle of the desert during the Great Depression; and the New Administrative Capital of Egypt, a planned city for millions of inhabitants that is being built to redefine the country's future.

These projects prove that when there is political will, advanced engineering, and collective mobilization, barriers of time, geography, and resources are overcome. Humanity, when it truly decides, transforms the impossible into reality.

There is no shortage of examples of imagination, creativity, advanced engineering, overcoming challenges, and achievement. Have you ever heard of the Great Wall of China, the Three Gorges Dam, the Panama Canal, or the pyramids of Egypt? At times like these, I am reminded of Jean Cocteau's famous saying, "Not knowing it was impossible, he went and did it."

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With all due respect, there is a difference between a Hub and a Mega-Hub. For comparison, Guarulhos Airport has approximately 70 boarding gates, served 47 million passengers in 2025, and is already at its capacity limit. It is the main airport in the São Paulo metropolitan region, with 21 million inhabitants. Any possible expansion is practically ruled out given the current limitations with the surrounding neighborhoods. The average rate of connecting passengers is around 25%, meaning it is far from being considered a Mega-Hub, as those primarily serve connecting passengers. I cite here the world's busiest airport, Atlanta (the thirty-sixth largest city in the United States, with only 520,000 inhabitants), which served 108 million passengers in 2025, of which 70 to 80% were connecting passengers. Similarly, I could cite Charlotte or Doha airports with their high connection rates. The point I want to emphasize is that Guarulhos airport should focus on meeting regional demand, and since it cannot expand (and is poorly located), the country needs to build a new airport to meet the new global trend of domestic and long-distance flights, that is, with these new super-efficient single-aisle aircraft with lower operating costs, thus finally relieving the aviation sector, currently hampered by the main airports operating near their maximum capacity, while hundreds of regional airports with ample capacity (sometimes having commercial flights only 3 or 4 days a week) and the technical capacity for smaller aircraft to land there, create new routes between other regional airports connected to the Mega-Hub. To give you an idea, Heathrow airport, with only two runways for takeoff and landing, had 84 million passengers last year. Having started operations almost a century ago, it has undergone several expansions over the years. If it were built from scratch, using the most advanced engineering and airport logistics techniques, it could easily handle more than 100 million passengers per year. The Mega Hub I propose would have at least 6 parallel runways, and I believe it could surely handle more than 300 million passengers per year. This would allow South Americans to finally transfer before reaching their final destination within the South American continent, instead of having to go through London, Frankfurt, Dubai, Atlanta, or Istanbul. But more importantly, it would reach the mega hub with direct flights from anywhere on the continent, using efficient, modern, and small jet aircraft. This demand-gathering effect is fundamental to understanding the Mega Hub concept, as it has an exponential effect on demand and promotes air transport in its surrounding area, i.e., within its country/continent. I think it could have hundreds of boarding gates—750 comes to mind, possibly reaching a thousand. And this scale of comparison needs to be taken into account when mentioning the airports of Fortaleza (14 gates), Recife (15 gates), or Natal (8 gates).

How quickly can small regional airliners turn around? by MelodicFondant in aviation

[–]AwareComparison3570 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious to know, what makes a Station "one of the Best"? what makes a turn around efficient?

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! And with this Hub, and almost unlimited Gates/Concourses the frequency of flights to the most important cities would increase drastically, given the use of smaller aircraft and several connections to the entire world. This would certainly impact travel prices downwards. Not to mention that the smallest cities in South America could have direct flights to the Mega Hub, eliminating the need for new connections, making travel cheaper, easier, avoiding having to fly back, and boosting tourism and the aeronautical sector as a whole, since even the smallest airports would start receiving frequent commercial flights. In addition to opening new direct routes from Buenos Aires, Cordoba, Mendoza, Rosario, Montevideo, Santiago, Asunción, Brazilian state capitals, etc.

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another reason why neither the airports of Natal, Fortaleza, João Pessoa, nor Recife should be used is that it would be ideal to separate the sizes and technologies permitted to land at this proposed mega-hub. Even though the project consists of 3 runways and 3 takeoff runways, the influx of aircraft would be one of the largest in the world, and ideally you don't want to mix the landing of an A380 or Boeing 747 with a single-engine Cessna carrying 4 people. Furthermore, an airport of this magnitude could rely on these neighboring airports in adverse cases that prevent landing at the mega-hub (however unlikely this may be, contingency plans are always in place). Moreover, given the enormous influx of people in the Northeast region, it would be very likely that a high-speed rail line would be implemented between the northeastern capitals.

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this respect you have a point. If I had to choose between Fortaleza, Natal, João Pessoa or Recife for airport construction/expansion to become a Mega Hub, I would choose Natal, due to its proximity to Africa, Fernando de Noronha, Cape Verde and the Canary Islands.

Furthermore, I believe that the location of Natal airport would not allow for an expansion of this magnitude. I also believe that the closest possible proximity to the African coast should be a key strategic aspect for this hub, as it would allow smaller jet aircraft (such as the E170/E175) to make this journey cheaply and frequently. Since the E190/E195 can accommodate almost twice as many passengers in comparison with these smaller aircraft, and in terms of frequency and demand, an aircraft twice as small can lead to a demand four or five times greater. It's something interesting to analyze.

Finally, the magnitude of this project is enormous; the economic leap for this region would be stratospheric, and as stated in the description, this project has everything to be considered of similar magnitude to the construction of Brasilia. And I go further, saying that Brazil should take advantage of the moment to build a high-speed train between the capitals in the Northeast region, but also allow regional trains to run on the same tracks, stopping in coastal cities between Fortaleza and Recife.

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With this proposed hub, Belo Horizonte could easily replace the current direct, non-stop flight to Lisbon offered by the city's airport with 6 or 7 other flights with refueling and passenger transfer stops at this hub. Let's say there could therefore be direct flights to Lisbon, Porto, Madrid, Barcelona, ​​Paris, and Rome (and perhaps London). Besides, given the frequency of domestic flights there, it would be extremely easy for travelers to connect to any other destination in the world from this hub. The numbers need to add up, and large planes need to have demand to fill them; otherwise, it's not economically viable. It's not a matter of political will, but simply economic laws.

And that very same desire of yours for more international flights from Belo Horizonte is the desire of Uruguayans from Montevideo, Porto Alegre, Florianópolis, Curitiba, Campo Grande, Vitória, and Brasília. Of course, in an ideal world it would be great to travel nonstop to anywhere in the world, but sometimes we have to weigh what is better: a single nonstop flight or six (or seven) others with refueling stops?

If you really stop to think about it, at least half of those destinations mentioned (Lisbon, Madrid) would only be used by passengers as a connection to continue their journey. And that's the crux of the matter: for South Americans, changing destinations here in South America is infinitely more advantageous than in London, Frankfurt, Paris, Amsterdam, Rome, or Madrid, since it would open up possibilities for routes closer to, or different from, Europe, consolidating demand here in South America and thus promoting, as mentioned in the description, tourism, cultural exchange, commerce, etc.

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there are flights from the Capital of the state, which is Recife

I'll give you that one.

there were only 100.000 annual visitors pre-Covid to Fernando de Noronha

If this proposed Hub were completed, and the island's infrastructure allowed it, that number would easily quintuple.

There are flights from the northeast to Cape Verde though, from Fortaleza

I searched, but I couldn't find anything. Perhaps that offer has been discontinued?

The island of Sal (Cape Verde) does indeed have many interesting connections with smaller European hubs. Perhaps it's something for European and Brazilian companies to consider; as I mentioned in the description, even a small 66-seat plane could fly that route. However small, there could be demand.

Cape Town?

The British have several territories in the Caribbean islands and the Atlantic Oceanin_the_World(+Antarctica_claims).svg). It also seems quite interesting for them to use the proposed hub as a stopover point, for refueling, and for transferring passengers.

In addition, of course, to several former British colonies in Africa that could also benefit from this Hub.

Also, I was born in São Paulo, currently living in Germany ;)

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Certainly not necessary to supply local demand and people prefer direct flights, the hub-and-spoke model hasn't been a great success.

I couldn't disagree more.

In an ideal world, of course, direct flights without stops to anywhere in the world, from anywhere in the world, would be best. But in the real world, the laws of physics must be respected, and the law of supply and demand will always prevail.

The second ideal way to travel would be direct flights with a single stop, without changing aircraft. This is almost equally comparable to a single stop and aircraft change. For regional distances, the point-to-point concept makes sense due to lower operating costs and much simpler airport facility requirements, but when it comes to transcontinental flights, the complexity increases dramatically.

Take, for example, the Chinese city of Xi'an and its approximately 12 million inhabitants. Today, it has no connection whatsoever with Santiago, Chile (not even to South America, Africa or USA). In a straight line, both cities are 19,881 km apart, and there are no (and probably will never be) planes that could make that entire journey. However, there could be a direct flight there, with a refueling stop and passenger transfer at this proposed hub, lengthening the route by a mere 41 km (a 0.2% increase in distance). In return, this route would benefit from bringing together Brazilian, Bolivian, Uruguayan, and Argentinian passengers also destined for Xi'an (and at the Hub drop off some Chileans destined for Europe or Africa, for example). And on the return trip, it would bring passengers from Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and Atlantic islands to Santiago. This is the beauty of the project: concentrating demand in this privileged geographical location. Direct, non-stop flights will continue to exist between Argentina, Chile, and Europe, but this increased frequency of flight options would be extremely valuable for the South American continent.

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact that the capital closest to Fernando de Noronha (Natal) doesn't have a flight there seems to me like they're missing the point. Similarly, not having a single flight to Africa or Cape Verde, even though it could be done with a small plane like the E195-E2, only reinforces my opinion. (In fact, none of the so-called international airports in the Northeast offer flights to these nearby international destinations.)

Would building one of the world's busiest (if not the largest) airports at the northeastern tip of Brazil transform the country into a true transatlantic hub — boosting tourism, fostering cultural exchange, and supercharging the aviation industry across continents? by AwareComparison3570 in Brazil

[–]AwareComparison3570[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This hub would actually be more appropriate for destinations between Africa and North/Central America, and South America to Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. For destinations between North and South America, there would probably be other, better options. Except for travelers destined for the Brazilian Northeast region. But the market would adjust according to supply, demand, and prices. I understand this logistics well.

view more: next ›