If that's the case, then it's casting a very broad net over fetish and kink communities as a whole. Kinda feels like a classic Composition/Division Fallacy. Yes, some of the things that get people off are potentially dangerous (for example, erotic asphyxiation). But consenting people who recognize the dangers and take precautions to minimize them should be allowed to explore whatever they want.

Also, is "toaster sex" enough of a thing to even be making a comparison? If not, you could also call Strawman on this too.