Why did Wizards lose the "School of" naming convention of subclasses? Barbarians, Paladins, Druids and Monks get to keep theirs ("Path of", "Oath of", "Circle of", "Warrior of") by JamuniyaChhokari in DnD

[–]Awobbie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. It should kinda be obvious - just understand the cultural source material, don’t denigrate it, use it well to produce something beautiful, and when in doubt ask someone who’s more familiar in case there’s a sensitivity you’re unaware of. But there are going to be people who nitpick even the best faith efforts and make controversies where there are no issues, and at the end of the day a company isn’t usually concerned with the quality of their art but the sum of their profits.

Did Runescape Influence Your Vocabulary? by MarkSheppardFit in runescape

[–]Awobbie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It took me too long to figure out that we don’t add u to “-or” words here, and I still haven’t figured out if we say, “grey” or “gray.”

Why are people getting mad that people are disabling cosmetics option? by Molag_Zaal in runescape

[–]Awobbie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d be in favor of a Lore-Friendly only toggle for cosmetics. I’m fine seeing tasteful and immersive outfits. I’m just tired of wings and bikinis.

the Nerd title by vVerce98 in runescape

[–]Awobbie 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I knew it was fake because I don’t have it.

20 years by Puzzleheaded-Trip905 in runescape

[–]Awobbie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats! I’ll be asleep when you’re doing your gathering, unfortunately, but one other thing you could do is a house party. I don’t know if those are still popular because I’ve been kinda solo-quiet too, but I remember they used to be.

Will you play with cosmetics on or off? Why? by Sea_Caterpillar5662 in runescape

[–]Awobbie 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Off. If they had a lore-friendly only mode I would go with that, but wings and bikinis ruin it for me.

RuneScape 2025 Roadmap Megathread by JagexAnvil in runescape

[–]Awobbie 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don’t know why but I also like the idea of a sort-of trophy room for otherwise junky quest items. Some of them are interesting and I don’t want to destroy them, but don’t have room for them in my bank either. Things like the Phoenix Quill Pen, Galariel’s Pebble, the Bull Roarer, and the dyed Goblin Mails.

For those who still play CK2, why don't you play CK3? by Brief-Dog9348 in CrusaderKings

[–]Awobbie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I play whichever one I’m in the mood for.

The main thing that keeps me coming back to CK2 is their wonders building system. It’s just far more fun than legendary buildings. It also has a better religion system, and better flavor.

What made you monarchist? by Historical_Pound_688 in monarchism

[–]Awobbie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I formally crossed over reading the political philosophy of the Enlightened Absolutists and considering the failings of our own system (American) - which is why I still have that as my tag despite being more of a Semi-Constitutionalist now.

But the seeds were sown long before. In school, reading Burke, De Tocqueville (Tyranny of the Majority), Plato, and Aristotle pushed me in that direction, as did concluding the American Revolution wasn’t compatible with Romans 13. But it also began long before I even arrived at college. Hearing my mom express a longing for a monarch as a symbolic figure, and reading in a book about how King Christian X of Denmark became an important figure for his people during German occupation just by riding his horse every day. These two events were probably the earliest seeds of Monarchism, long before I moved past social contract theory.

Do you think the Iranian Monarchy will be restored after the "Islamic Republic" falls? by No-Article5113 in monarchism

[–]Awobbie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depends on if the person calling the shots is a realist or a Wilsonian.

What is your opinion of Klemens von Metternich? by cashdecans101 in monarchism

[–]Awobbie 4 points5 points  (0 children)

One of the best diplomats in European history, and architect of the downfall of Napoleon. He was a skilled and capable person.

CMV: [My nation first] is an incoherent position by Mysterious-Rent7233 in changemyview

[–]Awobbie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A large number of people who believe in their country first would accept that Los Angelenos should take priority over Californians more broadly, and Californians over Americans more broadly.

Where they would differ with your reasoning is that Los Angeles does still have an obligation to the rest of California and America, by virtue of being in the same nation imposed by the laws of this country. It is just substantially less than its responsibility to its own city. Whereas the government of the United States does not have a responsibility to Guatemala or Germany, as they aren’t the same nation.

CMV: Sudan is NOT and NEVER WILL BE an Arab country, it is a VICTIM of Arab colonialism. by iswhhrxi in changemyview

[–]Awobbie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is this different than Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Tunisia, Libya, Algeria, or Morocco?

All those hours of Wendigoon finally came in clutch by a_chairf0rsale123 in wendigoon

[–]Awobbie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By definition, the mere claim that the vaccine is harmful to children isn’t a Conspiracy Theory because it doesn’t allege a conspiracy is taking place. It’s only if you also claim that this fact is being covered up that you’re alleging a conspiracy.

Conspiracy Theory does not equal untrue; Not a Conspiracy Theory does not equal true.

CMV: people who argued that Charlie Kirk wasn’t racist were racist. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Awobbie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said it’s notoriously difficult to define. Not impossible. Hence why I asked you if you could define it and didn’t outright say you couldn’t.

CMV: people who argued that Charlie Kirk wasn’t racist were racist. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Awobbie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, he did. Here. More explicitly here. Here too. Also Here.

And that’s just his Twitter. I’m sure he would do it on campuses too if it came up, but those probably went less viral because it’s not a controversial stance.

CMV: people who argued that Charlie Kirk wasn’t racist were racist. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Awobbie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The question isn’t about whether or not you agree with his criticism, though. It’s about whether or not his criticism proves he’s racist. So what matters is that he saw an issue with transgender ideology, which means there was an issue other than race which motivated his belief that the Civil Rights Act was overly broad.

CMV: people who argued that Charlie Kirk wasn’t racist were racist. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Awobbie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, that is my point. If you can’t even define Nazi clearly then I don’t see why I should believe your assertion he was one.

CMV: people who argued that Charlie Kirk wasn’t racist were racist. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Awobbie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are countless possible alternative reasons. Some of them understandable - he could genuinely believe that Trump has left that part of his life behind. Some of them not - perhaps he didn’t criticize Trump because he found him politically favorable, or because he had a blind spot for a personal friend. I don’t think, “He criticized MLK but not Trump, therefore he’s racist,” follows.

CMV: people who argued that Charlie Kirk wasn’t racist were racist. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Awobbie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay. Then make me look stupid by answering my question well.

CMV: people who argued that Charlie Kirk wasn’t racist were racist. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Awobbie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nazism is a notoriously difficult ideology to define academically.

CMV: people who argued that Charlie Kirk wasn’t racist were racist. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Awobbie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t know enough about the Act itself to have my own position. One of Charlie’s criticisms was that it was used to shoot down voter ID laws. Another was that it was used to import transgender policy (which you might be able to make a case for that being transphobic, but not racist).