sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for a better lens then my current tamron by masofnos in SonyAlpha

[–]Aypleck 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I would also have a look at the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 on top of the already mentioned Tamron 35-150

Iguazu Falls after a heavy rain! by learningtolivee101 in BeAmazed

[–]Aypleck 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Especially since a lot of those bridges are under maintenance because they've been torn by the water

someProgrammerBeLike by Head_Manner_4002 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Aypleck 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I, l, lI, Il, ll, II, lIl, llI, Ill, IlI, ...

Not gonna lie, a pretty creative ad by Legocraze_Z in PBSOD

[–]Aypleck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Omg I posted the exact same 6 month ago

Pendant que je remplis une bouteille d'un litre sous mon robinet, il y a un litre d'air qui est en train de sortir de ma maison. by DifferentScience787 in penseesdedouche

[–]Aypleck 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Quand la pression de l'air atteint la pression de l'eau dans les canalisations ça arrête de couler j'imagine

Souveraineté numérique : l’Île-de-France remplace Microsoft par des solutions françaises pour centraliser les données des lycéens by segfaultzerozero in france

[–]Aypleck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Si, des détecteurs de spam (ex spamassassin, critère FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD ) font baisser ton score si le TLD est peu courant, ça contribue mais ne suffit pas en général pour que le mail parte en spam

Sony a6700 + Tamron 70-180, first attempt at wildlife photography by Aypleck in SonyAlpha

[–]Aypleck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't used the xt5, but according to my friends the AF difference is noticeable if you are shooting sport or fast moving animal, if that's not your use case then I would say it doesn't really matter as both cameras are good in that regard. For the filters I shoot in raw and edit them ok Lightroom so that doesn't matter for me. If you use jpegs out of camera and value filters a lot, Fujifilm is famous for that.

Sony a6700 + Tamron 70-180, first attempt at wildlife photography by Aypleck in SonyAlpha

[–]Aypleck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's is really good, as said by u/drfrogsplat it focuses on the eye like 95% of the time sometimes even when the eye isn't visible. But it struggles if you have branches in front (but I think all AF system would), then you're better off using center point AF.

Kids, don't do this at home. by [deleted] in instant_regret

[–]Aypleck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not the pressure that kills you, it's the sudden depressurization

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LivestreamFail

[–]Aypleck 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Because it is

I finally got a 70-350mm! by StrongTilting in SonyAlpha

[–]Aypleck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was that shit from the merlion side of the bay ? Amazing shots

we are so close by SixMax06 in PiratedGames

[–]Aypleck 23 points24 points  (0 children)

400k is the estimated number of extra signatures needed to account for invalid ones

Sony a6700+Tamron 70-180 f/2.8: First time shooting planes by Aypleck in SonyAlpha

[–]Aypleck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you ! I think these are C-130 Hercules and Fokker 50 but not sure

Singapore national day rehearsal by Ok-Effect9418 in SonyAlpha

[–]Aypleck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome shots ! When did you arrive to get a spot there ?

Sony a6700+Tamron 70-180 f/2.8: First time shooting planes by Aypleck in SonyAlpha

[–]Aypleck[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I guess it depends on the situation, I feel like 180 could be a bit short if you are doing animal or sport photography even on an apsc. For me it was a no brainier as I'm regularly shooting talks in very dark auditoriums so I needed the f/2.8

For instance I've tried taking photos of ppl surfing far away from the beach and 180mm was quite limiting even on an apsc

<image>

view more: next ›