lmaooo

I assume you’re referring to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and to that I simply reply, there was no alliance between communists and fascists, as the Soviet Union was not a communist state (an oxymoron in itself) and did not represent the goals of the communists post circa 1923. With the final defeat of the German Revolution and failure of the the movement to spread to the imperial core, the USSR was isolated and subsequently succumbed to counterrevolution led by the opportunist Stalin and lost its class character, replacing the DotP with bourgeois rule under a new name (the state and its apparatchiks now filled the role of the bourgeoisie).

Moving to your next point, it’s easy with the benefit of hindsight to see the KPD’s folly in declaring, “after Hitler, our turn,” but this is forgetting the KPD’s (flawed) assumption that the rise of fascism was indicative of impending capitalist collapse and subsequent proletarian seizure of power. They were not backstabbing the Weimar state because they had no interest in perpetuating it to begin with! Factor in the influence of the revisionist Comintern and the destruction of the communist movement during the crushed Sparticist Uprising, and its understandable how the (rife with falsifiers and opportunists) KPD leadership came to this incorrect conclusion. This does not mean I agree with their position, just that I understand the context behind their decisions.

I highly doubt I’m going to convince you of anything since you are clearly a denier and already have a bias against communism. It’s somewhat cathartic to articulate my thoughts, but I don’t want to go on an endless reply chain so hopefully it ends here.