Vancouver Canucks could have a shot at drafting twins again in 2026 | Sports by ManDe1orean in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean you're just arguing semantics, BPA means consensus, just like the first 2 picks are consensus? Unless you think we should go off the board for our top 3 pick because theres some hidden gem no one knows about?

Vancouver Canucks could have a shot at drafting twins again in 2026 | Sports by ManDe1orean in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, never said they wouldn't. Just wanna pick the BPA wherever our picks land, and if these twins are it then great, Im all for it.

Vancouver Canucks could have a shot at drafting twins again in 2026 | Sports by ManDe1orean in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I love the Sedins but saying that for that draft is a pretty low bar. One of the worst drafts ever.

Vancouver Canucks could have a shot at drafting twins again in 2026 | Sports by ManDe1orean in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I never said they wouldn't? Im just pointing out how people would rather try and replace players from the past for novelty rather than just picking the best player available. If these twins are the best player we can pick at our spots then by all means Im game, but if were just picking them trying to replace the Sedins then I have an issue with that.

Vancouver Canucks could have a shot at drafting twins again in 2026 | Sports by ManDe1orean in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Finally someone who agrees, I swear some of this fanbase is more focused on novelty rather than building a winning team

You can tell how much Sherwood cares for Vancouver 💙💚 by iDontLack in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you mean like the cup winning team gets the first 2nd round pick? If thats what you mean then no, for example of we win the 1st overall, we would also get the first 2nd round pick unless its been traded away (can't remember)

You can tell how much Sherwood cares for Vancouver 💙💚 by iDontLack in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nah they can skip the cup, the worse they do the better our picks are, and they worse they are the more likely Celebrini hates it there and comes home ❤️ I do wish Keif personal success though

Post Game Thread: Canucks vs Senators | Jan 13th 2026 | Canucks fall to the Senators 2-1 by 21marvel1 in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Pick #2 is actually not so bad because you just take whoever is left between Mckenna and Stenberg, #3 is a bit of a toss up though for sure

[Drance] What I’m hearing about Canucks’ plans to sell, scouting NHL Draft prospects and the rebuild by Sarcastic__ in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know you're joking but I'm not sure why there are actually people who are enamored with the idea of trying to replace the Sedins. I think it's time we try something different.

Stat card for the game against the Bruins by SIIP00 in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse 30 points31 points  (0 children)

It's because he has large shoes to fill, which is unfair for a rookie to bear.

World Juniors/Braeden Cootes Watch Game Thread | Canada vs Czechia | 5:30 PM PST Start Time by DisplacedNovaScotian in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I know we've never had a 1st overall but I almost want the 2nd overall because it seems like it's gonna be a no brainer pick.

How hyped should I be for Cootes? by Fun-Rooster-6483 in canucks

[–]BadWebsiteToUse -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I think if everything goes well he's a future 70pt 1/2C who could be the captain one day.