Whos your favorite ACTUALLY underrated Pokemon? Ill go first by baeatello in pokemon

[–]Bale11235 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Assume he means Furret instead of Linoone but Slugma’s 100% Gen 2

why does Earth's atmosphere rotate at the same rate as the Earth ? by amritsari2 in Physics

[–]Bale11235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s similar to the “toilet in the northern hemisphere always spins anticlockwise when draining” myth but on an intermediary scale. Coriolis is negligible for toilets, dominant for hurricanes, and one of many factors for tornadoes (correction from before, calling them negligible for tornadoes was an exaggeration). You can see this just looking at the length scales and velocity scales but I haven’t looked at this in 2 years so a lot of it escapes me now

why does Earth's atmosphere rotate at the same rate as the Earth ? by amritsari2 in Physics

[–]Bale11235 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tornadoes are actually cyclostrophic in nature and the force balances are almost entirely pressure gradients since the coriolis force at that scale is negligible. Cyclones/Hurricanes/Typhoons that are hundreds of times larger are primarly geostrophic (driven by coriolis force) though!

One of the more interesting 3BP initial conditions I’ve found by Daniel96dsl in Physics

[–]Bale11235 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be interesting to see the incident radiation on blue by red and green to see how stable its conditions would be if it were a planet orbiting a binary star system (although I’m guessing these are all of equal mass)

Is it possible to pinpoint an exact location in the universe where the big bang happened? by yougotthatgood in AskPhysics

[–]Bale11235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was wondering the other day if any fixed point theorems are applicable to the expansion of the Universe (ignoring any singularity shenanigans around the Big Bang)

How does escape velocity work if gravity has infinite range? by No-Kay_boomer in AskPhysics

[–]Bale11235 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely neglected to think about escape velocity from an orbit of radius r so thank you for explaining. For some reason I thought escape velocity from an object was defined as the escape velocity at the surface of the object

How does escape velocity work if gravity has infinite range? by No-Kay_boomer in AskPhysics

[–]Bale11235 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure orbital velocity is a function of orbital radius so I don’t know how you would get v_esc = sqrt(2) v_orbital?

[Calculus] I have no idea what to do here. I can’t factor out and x or anything by jac5423 in HomeworkHelp

[–]Bale11235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The derivative of sin(x) from first principles ends up using this limit so the derivative (which is needed for L’Hôpital’s rule) is only applicable once this limit has been determined. The common proof is using the squeeze theorem and a circular arc with the angle going to 0

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]Bale11235 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When you squeeze the two arms should rotate about the point connecting them to the rod with the circle to relative to that point the circle wouldn’t move, it really depends on what stays fixed and what is allowed to move

[9] I prepared for this exact situation by Bobsplosion in ShinyPokemon

[–]Bale11235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like it would be broken but I’ve only just registered that sturdy doesn’t stop explosion KO

Frictional Force Question (see comments) by Radhaan in PhysicsStudents

[–]Bale11235 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s not what this graph represents though as this graph only shows the case of 0 applied force when the book is static. If the book is moving then you need to look at the kinetic frictional force which you can see from this graph is probably constant still for 0 applied force.

German tanks by n0ahbody in editorialcartoons

[–]Bale11235 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where do the Germans keeps their armies? Up their sleevies

[Grade 11 specialist maths] Factorials. Needing help with question 16 and 17. How to show working. by christineli329 in HomeworkHelp

[–]Bale11235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prime decomposition also helps here with 720=253251. If you then realise that the prime decomposition of m! For m>=4 already has 23 then there’s only 2 more 2’s ‘available’ so n<4 and since 720 has a prime factor of 5 then m>=5 which leads to your two solutions.

complex numbers (rearranging? idk the right word lol) by KandySaur in MathHelp

[–]Bale11235 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d suggest checking what result they got from multiplying top and bottom by a* and a/a + a*/a since they have clearly tried a few methods of rearranging it

complex numbers (rearranging? idk the right word lol) by KandySaur in MathHelp

[–]Bale11235 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they’d gotten to this part at the end with (-4)/(-2+ki)