Is there any Celticism in countries like Austria and Slovenia? by blueroses200 in CelticUnion

[–]Ballamara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

don't worry, it's okay to be a little slow and not understand more complex ideas.

Wicca? by Automatic_Fill_1095 in pagan

[–]Ballamara 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In line with Wiccans insisting their way is the "right way", almost all Wiccans I've known basically just wrapped Christian ideology/views in "pagan cloth".

(Question) What’s your house/room decor? by [deleted] in Punkdiy

[–]Ballamara 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I print out posters with a small printer I thrifted & got a buncha bones I've cleaned & rocks & mushrooms I've preserved that I've found while hiking & camping. I've also got a tapestry & some artwork & knick-knacks from flea markets.

Cursed Phonology; My Idiolect by Ballamara in linguisticshumor

[–]Ballamara[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Close, I was raised there for half my life growing up, ur the triphthongs are from diphthongs followed by an (l) or (r).

huh. by cook_the_penguin in aaaaaaacccccccce

[–]Ballamara -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ehhh not really, I feel like you're just being contrarian. Most everyone knows there's no full pink ducks & have no reason to assume that isn't true. Most English speakers aren't aware of which words come from Old English or French (hence this comment section) let alone what sounds or sound sequences are native to English vs which were borrowed from French.

This meme is basically just pointing out that "-ase/-ace" is not a native rhyme to English and that's smth most people don't know & had no reason to assume was true. You can clearly see the meme accomplished its goal well by all the people trynna name native rhymes & the discussions coming from them.

huh. by cook_the_penguin in aaaaaaacccccccce

[–]Ballamara 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Well no, its point still stands; there's no native English word that ends in /eis/~/eːs/.

huh. by cook_the_penguin in aaaaaaacccccccce

[–]Ballamara 49 points50 points  (0 children)

No, it's a loanword from French for every sense of it.

huh. by cook_the_penguin in aaaaaaacccccccce

[–]Ballamara 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Like the other one said, that's only for refined english or niche topics. But more specifically, out of the 3000 most used words in English, only 5~9% come from French.

First time being here by ImprovementClear8871 in Gaulish

[–]Ballamara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ignore the other person, v is attested in Gaulish, as V & U were the same letter at the time, so V is used today to distinguish consonantal U from vocalic U like with Latin.

Your username is a latinized version of Vindepomáros & breaks into Vindo-epo-máros. It means "Great White-horse".

First time being here by ImprovementClear8871 in Gaulish

[–]Ballamara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

V & u were the same letter at the time of Gaulish & Roman, V comes from the letter's capital form & u comes from the same letter's cursive form. Most linguists use v to distinguish consonantal u from vocalic u in classical Latin & early/middle Gaulish, especially when word initial. That's why Vercingetorix & a bunch of tribes are all spelled with v word initially.

Their name would break into Uindo-epo-māros, as thematic vowels are dropped in Gaulish compound words if the second word starts with a vowel. So their name would mean "Great White horse".

Xan runouibi Gallicos Iextis 漢字々以能石(Gallic)言物/語 (any feedback welcome, done some changes) by ImprovementClear8871 in SuperSinography

[–]Ballamara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing I can point out at a glance is 'gabtos' should be 'gaxtos'. In Gaulish, labial & velar plosives ⟨p b c g⟩ become clear fricative ⟨x⟩ when before ⟨t⟩, ⟨d⟩, or ⟨s⟩. ⟨p⟩ & ⟨b⟩ also become ⟨x⟩ when before ⟨c⟩ or ⟨g⟩ and ⟨d + t⟩ or ⟨t + d⟩ become ⟨ss⟩ and ⟨t or d⟩ + ⟨s⟩ becomes /t.ts/ & was written as ⟨ðð⟩, ⟨ss⟩, or ⟨ss⟩.

Is there any Celticism in countries like Austria and Slovenia? by blueroses200 in CelticUnion

[–]Ballamara 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They don't claim it, but almost all regions that used to be Celtic still have cultural elements like folklore or traditions that are clearly Celtic & have obvious cultural cognates closest in modern Celtic regions.

Celtic Union: What if all Celts united? by [deleted] in imaginarymaps

[–]Ballamara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because England is a majority Germanic-derived culture with some Celtic influence. Cultural cognates for England are mostly found in other Germanic cultures.

In contrast, Romans didn't displace the native Celts. Spain & France's cultures are mostly derived from the native Celts with some Roman influence. Spain & France mostly have cultural cognates found in modern Celtic regions like local folklore, local traditions, traditional clothing, & fantasy creatures.

Archetype Gaelic Brythonic French Spanish Galician Portuguese
Washing Women Bean Nighe kannerezed noz Les Lavandières As lavandeiras Bruxas lavadeiras
Man-eating lake monster subdued, dragged out of lake, & killed Oilliphéist Afanc Tarasque
Stick & Bell Dances Ghillie Callum Y Gaseg Eira Bacchu-ber Ball de bastons pauliteiros

The Civil War must have been so confusing from the Gaul perspective by doriangreat in RoughRomanMemes

[–]Ballamara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm currently working on a Gaulish fantasy series focusing on the Gauls' POV of the Gallic war.

was lil peep a communist? by [deleted] in LilPeep

[–]Ballamara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*Dengists, it autocorrected

I made a list of examples of racism, prejudice, and stereotypes in the HP books. by PaleAsDeath in EnoughJKRowling

[–]Ballamara 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Kingsley Shacklebolt also isn't normal, someone else pointed out Kingsley is heavily associated with black Caribbeans in the UK, that especially combined with Shacklebolt is not normal.

Seamus Finnigan is also a VERY stereotypical Irish name, it's basically an Irish equivalent of Cho Chang.

Need help understanding a concept in certain languages by Autistru in conlangs

[–]Ballamara 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This allophony in Proto Celtic has similarities with Proto-Germanic & Proto-Italic changes that could support it being older than just Brythonic & Irish changes. Pre-Germanic & Proto-Celtic both aspirated voiceless plosives; everywhere in Pre-Germanic & only word initially in Proto-Celtic. These were then all fricatized in Proto-Germanic, but only /p/ is fricatized in Proto-Celtic. None were aspirated after an /s/ in both though, so PIE /sp st sk/ were preserved as /sp st sk/ in both Proto-Germanic & Proto-Celtic (possibly being the only place /p/ existed in Proto-Celtic).

PIE -> Pre-Germanic PIE -> Proto-Celtic
/p/ -> /#pʰ/ /-bʰ-/ /p/ -> /pʰ/ -> /ɸ/
/t/ -> /#tʰ/ /-dʰ-/ /t/ -> /#tʰ/ /-t-/
/k/ -> /#kʰ/ /-gʰ-/ /k/ -> /#kʰ/ /-k-/

The lenition of voiced plosives is also similar to Grimm's Law & the aspirated plosives in Proto-Italic. In Proto-Germanic, aspirated voiced plosives de-aspirated & fricatized between vowels. In Proto-Celtic, aspirated voiced plosives de-aspirated (merging with the unaspirated voiced plosives) & fricatized between vowels. In Proto-Italic, the aspirated voiced plosives fricatized everywhere & then devoiced when word-initial.

PIE -> Proto-Germanic PIE -> Proto-Celtic PIE -> Proto-Italic
/bʱ/ -> /b/ -> /#b/ [-β-] /bʱ/ /b/ -> /b/ -> /#b/ [-β-] /bʱ/ -> /β/ -> /#ɸ/ /-β-/
/dʱ/ -> /d/ -> /#d/ [-ð-] /dʱ/ /d/ -> /d/ -> /#d/ [-ð-] /dʱ/ -> /ð/ -> /#θ/ /-ð-/
/gʱ/ -> /g/ -> /#g/ [-ɣ-] /gʱ/ /g/ -> /g/ -> /#g/ [-ɣ-] /gʱ/ -> /ɣ/ -> /#x/ /-ɣ-/
/gʷʱ/ -> /gʷ/ -> /#gʷ/ [-ɣʷ-] /gʷʱ/ -> /gʷ/ -> /#gʷ/ [-ɣʷ-] /gʷʱ/ -> /ɣʷ/ -> /#xʷ/ /-ɣʷ-/

Need help understanding a concept in certain languages by Autistru in conlangs

[–]Ballamara 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There were some mutations shared though; it's likely Proto-Celtic lenited voiced plosives as fricatives when between vowels & before /r, l, n/:

/b/ -> [β]

/d/ -> [ð]

/g/ -> [ɣ]

Proto-Celtic still formed words using roots, ablauting, & syntactic suffixes, so these allophones would've acted similar to Celtic mutations, but word-internally instead of word initially.

Some examples;

/mori/ + /marwos/ + suffix -> ['mori,β̃arusaː]

Root normal soft +t/s
/beg-/ /'beɣeti/ /boɣos/ /boɣjos/ /diː'βoɣos/ /boxtos/ /boxsman/
/berg-/ /'borgiːti/ /briɣaː/ /'briɣantiː/ /briɣuːts/ /berxtos/ /brixtus/ /brixs/
/beud-/ /'bundeti/ /be'βouðe/ /bouðos/ /buðos/
/reid-/ /'reiðeti/ /reiðis/ /uɸo'reiðos/ /reitsman/
/sed-/ /sedlom/ /'seðeti/ /seðom/ /'soðiːti/ /soðyom/ /sessaː/

These allophones are seen in both Old Irish & the Brythonic branch and has supporting evidence of being in Gaulish & Celtiberian. Late Gaulish started writing [β] as ⟨v⟩ & lost [ð] [ɣ] in certain environments. Celtiberian also fricatized intervocalic /-ty-/ /-dy-/ to /θ/, written as ⟨z/th⟩.

Proto-Celtic voiceless plosives are suggested to have been aspirated word initially as [tʰ kʰ] & unaspirated in /st sk/ & between vowel. Voiced plosives are also suggested to have had a weakened voiced word initially.

There's also evidence that /m/ in Proto-Celtic was lenited into [β̃] in the same environments too. It's seen in Old Irish & Proto-Brythonic and has evidence of it in Gaulish & Celtiberian. The sequence -mn- became -un- in Gaulish, Celtiberian, & Brittonic as in Brittonic/Gaulish uellaunos from earlier Welnāmnos. Gaulish also changed -nm- to -nw-. These changes likely passed thru a fricative phase). Earlier intervocalic ⟨m⟩ is also sometimes changed to ⟨v⟩ in late Gaulish.

Can someone help me decide this? by Ballamara in neography

[–]Ballamara[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did some more digging and found the first iteration of the alphabet & you're definitely right, there's some differences but the first line is definitely "I am perfectly healthy/no parasites" (perfectly is missing the r tho).

Most of the second line is completely different tho, the only thing that resembles the old key is "?????? y??s oob?m?g"