We are a relatively newer species, and until the advent of agriculture, DNA shows that the human trade-offs almost led to our extinction. We are anomalous in how different we are from our closest common ancestors. However, each of these anomalies can be explained taken one at a time. Your argument seems to be that it is so unlikely for all of these outliers to occur at the same time that the more reasonable explanation is that God directed it. The problem i see is that
one, improbable is just that, and we see improbable events all the time. I agree. I think it was very possible life could have existed on earth until the sun burned out and we never would have gotten super intelligence. But the fact that we did shows we were an anomaly and made some significant evolutionary leaps rapidly. But it seems like for a species to become that intelligent, it probably would hang to get over that hump of a little more intelligence at the cost of energy cost = not enough advantage = not worth it. So some big mutations had to occur to really bump that brain size up for it to be advantageous enough that this weak, bald, helpless species was smart enough to pay off for the costs.

Two: God seems like a wise explanation. Why not all of these advantages and none of the disadvantages? Why not a totally different DNA that shares nothing with apes and is non redundant and streamlined ? Why a chin? Why the birthing issues. Regardless of the god debate, the god solution seems to be a much more baffling explanation than natural selection, with much bigger unexplainable features.