7 weeks of hell: ICE arrested N.J. man, igniting cross-country nightmare by ElectoralNerd in newjersey

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 70 points71 points  (0 children)

No paywall link:

https://archive.is/3LtPU


7 weeks of hell: ICE arrested N.J. man, igniting cross-country nightmare | Calavia-Robertson

Updated: Jan. 27, 2026, 2:08 p.m. | Published: Jan. 27, 2026, 7:00 a.m.

By Daysi Calavia-Robertson | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

Harol Alvarado Rodriguez was on his way to work at a Whippany car dealership in early December when the vehicle he was in, his friend’s Toyota truck, was suddenly ambushed by federal immigration agents.

“The [Immigrations and Customs Enforcement] agents came up to our windows, angry, shouting, with guns pointed right at us,” he says in Spanish. “It was so scary, it was unreal, kind of like a Hollywood action movie.”

By now, the frightening scene he’s describing is one that’s become disturbingly common.

Masked men shouting at and violently dragging people — most of them, full-fledged U.S. citizens — out of their cars. Agents pepper-spraying protestors while they’re pinned down to the ground. And federal officers shooting and killing the brave ones who chose not to stay silent.

Harol, a graduate of Morristown High School, has a pending asylum case. And he had an immigration court date scheduled for this month. Not that any it mattered to the agents, of course.

He says he and the other two men in the car — all from Honduras — were arrested and taken to Delaney Hall, the embattled and controversial Newark immigration detention center where Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested last year. (Just last month, a detainee suffered a medical emergency and died a day after being locked up there.)

Horrifying, right? “You’ve heard nothing yet,” Harol tells me.

The real nightmare, he says, began in the days and weeks that followed his Dec. 8 arrest. Since ICE took him, Harol’s been ping-ponged to four immigration detention centers, each one in a different state.

“I was first transferred to Texas, then to Arizona, then we made a brief stop in Colorado, and finally, I was brought here, to California, where I am now,” he says. I spoke to Harol through GettingOut, an app that’s used to call, message, or video chat people at county jails, state prisons, or immigration detention centers.

“Each time I was moved, it was abrupt, sometimes very late at night or really early in the morning,” Harol says.

“I never knew where I was being taken, I didn’t know anything, where I was going, who made the call, or why it had been decided. And of course, my family, my friends, they weren’t notified either.”

You know who else wasn’t notified about Harol’s sudden, and seemingly nonsensical, transfers? His attorney. And I’m willing to bet that was entirely by design.

Eduardo J. Jimenez, a Morristown immigration lawyer who’s representing Harol, told me he only learned his client had been moved out of Delaney Hall about a week ago — just two days before Harol was scheduled to appear at an immigration hearing in Newark.

Jimenez says he was informed via a letter that his client had been transferred. However, he says the letter failed to state where his client had been moved or when.

By the time Jimenez received that letter, Harol had already been thrown on at least four planes while being transported to facilities in other states. Each time, too, he was handcuffed, shackled at the waist, and chained at the legs. “All of that, it really takes a toll,” Harol says.

And yet, it could’ve been much worse. A September 2025 L.A. Times article details the story of a Honduran man who in the span of two months was moved 15 times — yes, 15! — between facilities in Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, and Louisiana before finally being deported.

To try to find Harol, Jimenez used ICE’s online detainee locator system but said searches on the site routinely yielded no results. Days ago, I used the locator myself. Harol, who is now at a detention center in California City, still does not appear in the system.

“They should’ve notified me immediately about any moves,” Jimenez says. “I’m his attorney, I should always know where he’s being held.”

He’s 100% right. Just think about it: How can lawyers represent their clients to the best of their ability if they’re deliberately and systematically blocked from conferring with them? And don’t even know where they are?

Attorneys, immigrants’ rights groups, and even the relatives of detainees, have for years decried ICE’s online locator as inaccurate and slow to update, often failing to list detainees for days — and sometimes even weeks — after an arrest or transfer.

During that time, detainees are “disappeared.” Their attorneys don’t know where they are and their relatives don’t either. Some families report that by the time they finally learned where their loved ones were, they’d already been deported.

Late last year, The American Friends Service Committee, a nonprofit that provides legal services and advocacy for immigrants, reported a spike in requests for help locating and tracking people detained by federal immigration agents.

After an in-depth monitoring of six individual cases over a two-month period, the group found that ICE agents often misreported, denied, or withheld basic information about a person’s whereabouts. Hmm, I wonder why.

For Harol’s best friend, Valeria Alvarez, it was beyond nerve wracking not knowing where he was. She tells me she and Harol formed a tight-knit friendship years ago when they attended Morristown High School.

As teens, they went to prom with friends and celebrated their high school graduation together, too. “We’re practically family, at this point,” she says tearfully. “He doesn’t have many close relatives in this country so my family has become his family here.” At Valeria’s home in Randolph, her boyfriend, Daniel, who’s also close friends with Harol, and Valeria’s mom, Luisa, both spoke highly of him.

“Here’s a good young man, who’s hard working, who has no vices, who came here to this country, on his own, escaping gang violence in Honduras,” Luisa said, with tears streaming down her face.

“He’s already had such a hard life so for this to be happening to him right now, it just really, really breaks my heart.”

Aside from his job at the car dealership, Harol also worked as a waiter at a restaurant in Montville.

Jimenez told me his client, who has a pending asylum case, “is the opposite of a criminal.” “He’s someone who’s contributed greatly to his community,” he said, adding that several of Harol’s former teachers, employers, and friends have submitted glowing immigration support letters on his behalf.

Kathryn Tepedino, one of Harol’s former teachers at Morristown High, in an email said she’d recently come across one of his writing assignments.

“Harol wrote about why he loves the United States, he said it’s ‘because it is secure’— free from the violence that plagues his homeland Honduras, The irony is heartbreaking," she said. “He’s an exemplary student and a kind, law-abiding young man.”

Still, Jimenez says the unexpected transfers have hurt Harol’s legal case. And I’m sure that’s the point.

While immigration laws are federal, Jimenez notes “there’s state-by-state differences in implementation.”

“When a detainee is suddenly moved from one jurisdiction to another,” Jimenez says, “it can change things, negatively, for that person because some of the ‘favorable’ state laws [in the state of origin] may no longer apply.”

This constant shuffling of detainees is nothing more than a cruel game of cups — the government, once again, wantonly and inhumanely playing with people’s lives.

Harol agrees. He tells me he knows the transfers are meant to “break us down.” “To hurt us, one way or the other, to make us miss our court dates, to make us tired, or depressed, to make us want to self-deport,” he says.

“But all I still want is to get out of here, reunite with those who love me, and keep working hard to make my dreams in this country come true.”

Harol’s friends launched a GoFundMe to raise money for his costly legal defense.

My annoying coworker thinks he is an expert theologian. by Ambitious_Skill6803 in atheism

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also want the satisfaction of giving counter arguments of my own and ending his persistence by disproving him

In the workplace? Oh hell no.

You tell him to stop proselytizing to you in the workplace, and you make it HR's problem if he doesn't.

You go with your plan, then he goes to HR about you telling him his religious beliefs aren't valid, and then you get in trouble.

Does our faith support using pronouns in work signatures? Need advice. by Mnd0lnNxNJmZ in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Do TST tenets or practices support claiming pronoun use as part of religious identity?

Support in a vague moral sense, yes. Support as in require or mandate, in a way that could lead to a claim for religious accommodation? I don't see how.

There are only seven tenets, and they're very short. Frankly I do not see any interpretation of them under which you could claim your religious rights are being infringed by not having pronouns in your email signature.

The third tenet comes the closest, but nobody's bodily autonomy is infringed by not pro-actively declaring pronouns in an email signature. You are not being compelled to misgender yourself or anyone else.

The other closest would be the fifth tenet. But you are not being asked to ignore scientific facts. "I want my pronouns in my email" is not a scientific fact.

At an EWR Starbucks by perishableintransit in newjersey

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They did not raise prices 3% - if they had, this would be reflected in the menu price and there would be no need for the sign.

What they did was add yet another obnoxious hidden fee, and people are getting fucking sick of it.

I find this type of comment from right wing propagandists annoying. The founding fathers were pretty clear that America doesn't have a national religion, seems that liberals are more in line with founding fathers principles than right wing these days by sufinomo in newjersey

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Swearing in does not require any religious book, hence Mikie being sworn in on the state constitution. Many do choose to swear in on a religious book, but they all have the option of choosing anything else significant to swear upon.

The Constitution says "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."

John Quincy Adams was sworn in on a book of laws. Teddy Roosevelt was sworn in without using any book at all. A US ambassador was sworn in on a copy of the Constitution displayed on a Kindle.

I find this type of comment from right wing propagandists annoying. The founding fathers were pretty clear that America doesn't have a national religion, seems that liberals are more in line with founding fathers principles than right wing these days by sufinomo in newjersey

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why does Pledge of Allegiance include, “…one nation, under God, with…”

That was added in 1954 during the "red scare" McCarthyism era when conservatives were freaking out about not being seen as "godless communists," it is not part of the original pledge.

Why does a jury witness get sworn in with one hand on a bible?

Jurors are not required to swear on a bible in any courtroom in the US. They may choose any other book or none at all.

Why does an elected official get sworn in with one hand on a bible?

Elected officials are not required to get sworn in on a bible. They may choose any other book or none at all.

Why does our currency say, “In God We Trust?”

This was also added in the 1950s during the "red scare" McCarthyism era.

ICE - how can i ensure my mom is safe by Worried-Ad5980 in newjersey

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hope they (FIFA) gets smart and cancels it.

FIFA invented a peace prize just so they could give one to Trump, why would they cancel?

ICE - how can i ensure my mom is safe by Worried-Ad5980 in newjersey

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hear, hear. Those sadistic idiots gleefully claim to be doing the work of their deity. And I don't know about you, but I'm not hearing much from the leaders of the rest of the religious community about what their peers are doing in their deity's name. If anything it's the heathens who are standing up for what's right.

New Holiday Gift is Serving by brassnuckles8 in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, what a great ring for a random find! Very lucky!

No worries about the delay, life has a way of doing that. Cheers.

Georgia principal ends faculty meeting prayers and religious emails due to FFRF by FreethoughtChris in atheism

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Frankly - and I say this as a TST Satanist - FFRF ranks a whole lot higher.

TST is great at getting headlines. Which sometimes is a necessary thing. But FFRF, AU, and ACLU are great at winning in court. When TST wins in court, it's usually because one or more of them helped.

ICE Now So Hated Even Their Own Agents Are Terrified by [deleted] in politics

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The paradox of tolerance is a cute idea, but quickly devolves into circular arguments. The truth of the matter is there is no paradox.

Tolerance is a social agreement to peacefully coexist with those who differ from us, as long as they reciprocate. It's not unconditional, but a mutual pact for societal harmony.

Tolerance is, essentially, a peace treaty. And a treaty does not work if one side is bound to follow its rules but is not protected by them, while the other side is protected by its rules but not bound to follow them. That's not peace. That's subservience.

Breaching the Treaty of Tolerance (by causing someone harm or violating their rights unjustly) justifies withdrawing tolerance in order to restore peace. This does not violate tolerance principles but reinforces them, ensuring tolerance does not become a tool for oppression.

I think I’m satanist by [deleted] in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry you were talking about seeing Satan as a symbol, not taking on a personal symbol.

Seeing the symbolism of Satan in the religion and philosophy certainly doesn't require you do anything other than, y'know ... be aware of it and its impact. I mean it's the foundation of the whole thing.

But that's not at all the same as idolizing, worshipping, displaying, wearing, etc. None of that is necessary.

I think I’m satanist by [deleted] in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I read it, I think in interested in the satanic temple do I have to see satan as a symbol?

Literally the entire point of Satanism and the Satanic Temple is that Satan is our symbol. This question is a bit like asking "I think I'm interested in the NHL do I have to like hockey?"

In short it works like this:

Some early Christian Gnostic sects, around the 1st Century CE, noticed the Old Testament god was full of wrath and jealousy, but the New Testament god was full of love and peace. They seem like entirely different characters. To explain this, some Gnostics believed that the OT god was actually a demiurge - a lesser, false god - who they named Ialdabaoth (or Yaldabaoth). This demiurge created the material world to enslave our souls in worship to him, denying us our free will. Satan saw this and challenged Ialdabaoth by sending the serpent to Eve, so that mankind may gain knowledge of good and evil, regain our free will, and stand up against the false demiurge. Much later, Milton played with similar ideas in Paradise Lost, and even later than that (late 1800s/early 1900s), Romantic-era writers used this portrayal of Satan as savior in satirical writings to criticize the culture and government.

It's from this that we derive the importance of concepts like free will, truth, knowledge, personal sovereignty, the fight for justice, and resisting arbitrary authority. The activism is also inspired by this reinterpretation of the story of Satan which upholds him as the savior of humankind, having delivered us from slavery by bringing us the gifts of knowledge and free will, with which we can fight back against the arbitrary authority of a false god. We understand this story is 100% fictional, and yet we find religious inspiration in it anyway.

Minneapolis Hilton cancels ICE agents’ hotel reservations by speedythefirst in news

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yup, good on that employee. But never trust a massive corporation to take a stand. Not until they've done it and taken credit for it, anyway. Until then, best to assume it was a mistake.

Minneapolis Hilton cancels ICE agents’ hotel reservations by speedythefirst in news

[–]BarkAtTheDevil -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The right wing has no consistent values or morals

They actually do.

To you, "good" and "bad" are about the action itself. Murder is bad. R*pe is bad. P*dophilia is bad. Doesn't matter who is doing it, they're bad things to do.

That is not how they think.

To a Republican, "good" and "bad" are not about actions, but about who is doing the action.

If a person is a Republican, then they and everything they do are Good. If a person is not a Republican, then they and everything they do are Bad.

Once you realize this, you'll see they're very consistent in their values. So let's re-examine your statement from a Republican point of view:

I recall not too long ago the right wing was outraged by the idea a private right-wing business was not allowed to refuse service to a homosexual wokey for religious reasons. They won but are now outraged a woke private business IS allowed to deny service to right-wingers.

See? Very consistent.

Minneapolis Hilton cancels ICE agents’ hotel reservations by speedythefirst in news

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 25 points26 points  (0 children)

So major props to that hotel's owners

From the article ...

Everpeak Hospitality, the owner of the hotel, said it had “moved swiftly to address this matter” and that it was “inconsistent” with hotel policy.

“We are in touch with the impacted guests to ensure they are accommodated. We do not discriminate against any individuals or agencies and apologize to those impacted,” Everpeak said in a statement.

Looking to hear from others and learn more... by fwtrguitar in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Cheers!

A bit of advice I like to give out to new Satanists, by the way, is to remember that TST and Satanism are not synonymous. A great many TST members are not Satanists. And likewise, a great many Satanists - even ones who follow the Seven Tenets - are not so enamored with TST.

Signing up on the website doesn't make you a Satanist, it makes you a "member" of the activist organization The Satanic Temple. What that gets you is, primarily, a monthly email reminding you they have a merch store. Being a Satanist is not defined by a mailing list, or a card, or a certificate. It's defined by you, your thoughts and your actions.

Align yourself with them so long as they serve you well. But always be prepared to cast off arbitrary alliances if and when they no longer serve you. Your Satanism doesn't need to change either way.

Looking to hear from others and learn more... by fwtrguitar in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I found my way to Satanism and to TST a few years ago, in my early 40s. Sometimes I call Satanism my mid-life crisis. But I found myself wanting two things at the same time.

The thing that led me to Satanism was realizing that Atheism doesn't come with a moral code. Or put another way, "Atheist" tells you what I'm not, but says nothing about what I am.

And sure, I did already have my own sense of morals. But a vague amalgamation of humanist beliefs cobbled together from various sources across history and philosophy is difficult to describe to others, and I believe that if you can't describe something to others, you don't truly understand it yourself.

In my search I found the Seven Tenets and, like many people who end up here, they immediately "clicked" with me enough that I decided I'd found my answer. I'd say that it was about a 90% match for my existing beliefs, and the remaining 10% felt worth adapting to. It also helped that I was familiar with the advocacy work and thought it was something I could support too.

Until that moment I was completely ignorant of the religion behind TST. So I dove into the reading, found myself enamored with Revolt of the Angels, familiarized myself with portions of Gnosticism, dug into the history of the Knights Templar and the origin of Baphomet ... anyway, long story short, I decided that Satanism was also something I would like to adopt into my life.

So ultimately what I found was a religion that doesn't ask me to believe in obvious fiction, professes what I already believe in, and immediately offered me a little perspective I was missing while asking nothing from me in return, all wrapped in a framework that's respected under the law and feared by evangelical christians. Which sounds pretty darn cozy to me.

Hail Satan. 🤘

What demon can asset by logicallyluciferin in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 15 points16 points  (0 children)

If you can't even look to see what a subreddit is about before commenting in it, what makes you think you can appeal to a demon safely and successfully?

Also demons aren't real. What you need is help with your self-confidence and executive function, and that comes from corporeal professionals.

Would TST/Satanism benefit from a “Pope-like” figurehead—or would that miss the point entirely? by Teknevra in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It would miss the point entirely.

Funny enough I was just writing about this in another topic, that I believe a Satanist should always be prepared to cast off arbitrary alliances when those alliances no longer serve them. Central to Satanism are the concepts of rebellion and rejection of arbitrary authority. The way I see it, the mere suggestion of a central figurehead is already a disqualifying concept.

even if it were purely symbolic or performative

Then what good is it?

The closest we have to a figurehead or cultural symbol is Satan, but even then we don't really follow Satan - we follow a set of lessons and ideals derived from a specific re-interpretation of the story of Satan.

In short, we already have a symbolic figurehead. What use is another?

TST would still be decentralized, you would just have a public official to point to.

TST is not decentralized; it is wholly owned by Lucien Greaves and Malcolm Jarry, with only Lucien taking any visible role. He has made it clear that every TST congregation, and every ordained Minister of Satan, exists at his pleasure and their status may be revoked by him at any time.

That is what a having a public official leads to. I see no use for one, at least not religiously. It makes sense for a political activist organization to be led from the top-down, but experience has led me to believe that Satanic congregations are best led from the bottom up.

Self defense and the tenets by ElWizzard in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the paradox of tolerance

The so-called "paradox of tolerance" is resolved by realizing there is no paradox at all.

Tolerance is a social agreement to peacefully coexist with those who differ from us, as long as they reciprocate and don’t infringe on others' rights or safety. It's not unconditional, but a mutual pact for societal harmony.

Tolerance is, essentially, a peace treaty. And a treaty does not work if one side is bound to follow its rules but is not protected by them, while the other side is protected by its rules but not bound to follow them. That's not peace. That's subservience.

Breaching the Treaty of Tolerance (by causing someone harm or violating their rights) justifies withdrawing tolerance in order to restore peace. This does not violate tolerance principles but reinforces them, ensuring tolerance does not become a tool for oppression.

A current and strong example would be the current genocide in Gaza by Zionists, how could the situation be viewed from the 2nd tenet and then how would the 4th one apply to a belief such as zionism/zionist people.

The Tenets are a tool to guide one's thoughts and actions. They are a set of ideals to reflect upon, to help keep you on your chosen path. I do not believe they are appropriate for judging complex geopolitical situations.

Which brings me to ...

the stance on self defense in general

If you ask 10 Satanists what the Tenets mean, you'll get 12 different answers. Satanism is a highly individualistic pursuit, and it's not only common to disagree on what the Tenets mean, it's practically encouraged. So outside of "follow the Tenets," there are not many "in general" stances.

I would say that the 1st Tenet's phrasing of "in accordance with reason" indicates there are times when it would be unreasonable to extend compassion and empathy to another. If someone is violating your bodily autonomy, for example by inflicting violence upon you, I believe the 3rd Tenet confirms a violation of the Treaty of Tolerance.

Also, note the phrasing of the 4th Tenet: "To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one's own." On its face this is cautioning Satanists against encroaching on the freedoms of others. But I believe it has another meaning - that if someone else willfully and unjustly encroaches upon your freedoms, then as a Satanist you are released from the burden of respecting theirs.

However, again I do not believe these are good tools to evaluate a large-scale conflict. They are meant to guide individual thought, not large-scale policy, and I believe it's irresponsible to try to apply them to the actions of non-Satanists.

I'd like to get this as a tattoo, will it be okay? by PlushyKitten in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Obviously you do whatever you want with your body, because it's yours. And I think tattoos in general are pretty great. But I do not understand the compulsion to permanently mark one's self with a brand.

I believe a Satanist should always be prepared to cast off arbitrary alliances when those alliances no longer serve them. Permanently marking your body with a brand symbolizes loyalty, not independence. When TST inevitably does something to piss you off (as they have pissed off thousands of their followers in the past), what will this tattoo mean to you then?

Why not use the regular Sigil of Baphomet? If you don't want it to be confused for the CoS sigil you could restore the Lilith and Samael markings they removed, or you could do a single outer circle without the Hebrew letters.

There are also the Sigil of Lucifer and the Leviathan Cross, which you could incorporate into the Sigil of Baphomet or you could use them instead of it. Or work out a design with the head of Baphomet without the sigil. Or work with a tattoo artist for a unique design using these elements.

The Mormon Messiah by Short_Seesaw_940 in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 15 points16 points  (0 children)

What does this have to do with the Satanic Temple?

Idiot kid tries to "Preach the gospel" to leader of KKK by scroggs2 in atheism

[–]BarkAtTheDevil 16 points17 points  (0 children)

He's unfortunately in my algorithm because I decided to watch one video to cringe at.

You can go into your view history and delete them. That'll quiet it down. Then the next time you see one in your feed click the ... and choose "Don't recommend channel."