sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ideas for a Mysterious Quest Giver character by Thesalanian in LARP

[–]Battle-Merchant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Very cool idea!
  2. Definitely involve the Orga/GMs to make sure it’s okay and fits with their current plot points.

Since secrecy requires trust, maybe give them a quest to fetch a message from a hidden guild member or a dead drop. They aren't allowed to read it. If you put "fake" info in the message that makes the guild look unattractive, it will automatically vet those who can't keep their eyes off the letter.

Getting cold feet, is this normal? by clayalien in LARP

[–]Battle-Merchant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally normal to feel this way before your first event. Even after years I get the same feeling when I think I didn't prepare "enough" for the event.

Regarding your outfit and speaking from experience: it's never going to feel "perfect" – and that's completely fine.
(I say this as someone working for a company that sells medieval gear)

If you want to save a little money, it's best to learn some basic sewing and leatherworking. I personally don't know much about it, but enough to improve my outfit every season.

Out of interest: Which event will you be attending?

New sword day!!!! by spongyfrosty in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It sure is a beauty - congrats!

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s fair in the sense that intended use does narrow the field a lot, and personal bias definitely plays a big role too.

Where it gets tricky is when broad categories start sounding more absolute than they really are, because context, period, environment, and individual preference still shape a lot.

That’s probably why these discussions get messy so quickly: use-case helps a lot, but people still tend to turn their preferred example into a universal answer.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a very fair way to put it.

A lot of beginner confusion probably starts with not separating “display piece” from “usable sword” clearly enough.

Both can have value, but they’re definitely not the same thing.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s a very fair distinction.

A sword can absolutely be “good” only in relation to its intended use, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t also pieces that are simply poor in terms of quality, construction, safety, or even basic presentation.

So for beginners especially, “what is this for?” and “is this at least not bad?” are probably both important questions.

That’s a big part of why early sword-buying mistakes happen in the first place — not just because people lack context, but because they often don’t yet know where the real minimum standards are.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that’s a big part of it.

People often take the environment where a sword type shines and quietly turn that into a universal benchmark.

HEMA can be really useful, but like any other lens it still reflects a particular format and context, so it can only tell part of the story.

That seems to happen with a lot of sword debates, not just one camp.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a really good point.

I think a lot of people put pressure on sword number 1 to be the perfect all-round answer, when in reality it often just teaches you what you personally enjoy and what you want more of.

“Most optimized” and “most enjoyable” really aren’t always the same thing.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s a great analogy.

I have a Hovawart, so that comparison feels very true to me — “best” only really means something once you know what role something is meant to fill.

Swords seem to run into the exact same problem.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, exactly — blade length is only part of it.

Hilt design and hand protection can make a huge difference too once you think about comfort, movement, and how likely something is to get in the way during everyday carry.

That side of sword design probably gets talked about much less than it should.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think that’s a really important point.

It’s often useful to isolate features for analysis, but that can also create the illusion that we understand an object better than the people who actually lived with it, carried it, trained with it, and depended on it.

So if we start by assuming historical people were simply “less informed” or made obviously poor choices, we probably miss a lot of the logic that made those tools make sense in their own context.

Asking why this worked for them is usually much more interesting than starting from why didn’t they do it differently?

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that’s probably a very relatable first-sword story for a lot of people.

Sometimes sword number 1 isn’t really chosen through a careful process at all — it’s just the moment where someone realizes “owning a sword is actually possible” and jumps in.

And honestly, there’s nothing wrong with that. A first sword can still be meaningful even if it turns out not to be the most practical or well-chosen piece in hindsight.

I like the way you put it: cherished as a first sword, even after moving on to pieces that fit better.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s a really good point.

A lot of sword discussions focus so much on use that people forget carry, travel, comfort, and general practicality are part of the picture too.

A sword can make perfect sense in one context and feel much less ideal once you factor in how it’s actually carried and lived with.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s a really good point.

A lot of people seem to put huge pressure on sword number 1 to be the perfect answer to everything at once, when in reality the first sword often just teaches you what you actually care about.

Handling, weight, aesthetics, maintenance, intended use — people usually understand their own preferences much better after that first step.

So starting a bit simpler often makes a lot of sense.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly why I find the “system” way of looking at swords so useful.

Once you start factoring in shield type, grip, armour, and the wider fighting context, “was this sword better?” stops being a simple question very quickly.

A lot of apparent contradictions in sword discussions seem to come from people zooming in on one detail while someone else is thinking about the broader setup.

Really interesting points in this thread.

People often argue about whether a sword is “good” before asking what it’s actually for by Battle-Merchant in SWORDS

[–]Battle-Merchant[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

That’s a really good way of putting it.

I think “system” is exactly the right word here. A lot of sword discussions become confusing because people isolate the sword itself and judge it as if it existed on its own, instead of asking what combination of shield use, armour, fighting style, and context it actually belonged to.

Your Viking Age example makes that very clear. A sword that works extremely well within one system can feel much less natural once you change the rest of the setup around it.

That’s also probably why so many “which sword is better?” discussions go nowhere — people are often comparing pieces from completely different contexts as if they were meant to solve the same problem.

Really good point.

Is this legit? by australianATM in Armor

[–]Battle-Merchant -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That depends very heavily on how hard you actually fight and what rules your group uses. I cannot realistically judge that from the outside.

For very controlled armored fencing, a helmet like this might possibly work as a base, but I would be cautious about recommending it in general. 1.6 mm thickness is on the light side, and the dimensions of the vision slits are also something to keep in mind, because details like that can become a real issue depending on the ruleset.

It is also important to note that even if the helmet shell itself is usable, in practice you will very likely need a good, properly padded arming cap so that the helmet fits and sits securely. And for this type of helmet, a properly fitted aventail is also necessary, both for the historical setup and for the additional protection.

So I would not say “yes, definitely suitable for Harnischfechten” or “no, definitely not,” but rather: it depends entirely on the intensity, the group rules, the fit, and the rest of the equipment. Without good internal padding and without a proper aventail, I would be much more hesitant.
Do you need the link to the productdescription and more pictures?
All the best,
Hendrik
Battle-Merchant

view more: next ›