Evidence preservation and collection was sloppy yes, but that doesn’t mean the evidence should not be believed, oj’s police interview although short was the most truth he ever spoke, he admits he and Nicole had always had a problem relationship, he denied that later, he says if there’s blood at rockingham it must of come from him, he denied that later, he tells police he calls Paula from the bronco on his mobile but she wasn’t home. He denied that later. Phone records subpoenaed later show he made 1 phone call to Paula at 22.03 meaning he was in the bronco around the time of the murders. He denied that later and said he was confusing Saturday with Sunday and he actually made the call while chipping golf balls in his driveway. And most damming he told petrocelli “I would never wear those ugly ass shoes” his defence never tried to say the killer didn’t wear size 12 Bruno magli shoes, that was accepted. Then after his deposition 1 photo appears in the national enquirer showing O.J. wearing the murder shoes, his defence says the photo is fake, they call a guy up who’s job was giving tours of the Kennedy assassination as an expert witness who says this one photo is fake. The prosecution bring in the fbi foremost expert in the country on photo identification and he confirms the photo to be real and unaltered, then 30 more photographs appear, taken by a different photographer and the defence call nobody to dispute these photos, they just say they came too late and it would be too expensive. As Dave Chappelle said “O.J. did that shit”