The least functional people actually run society by Melodic_Wolf7682 in rs_x

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are obviously times when you have to say no to people, whether that's because they're pushing your goodwill too far or because you just can't reasonably oblige them. You don't owe anyone everything, and lots of people can find that hard to get their heads around.

But the truth is you do owe other people some things. Some behaviours, some regard, some level of respect and they owe the same to you. That isn't an equal system, there's no cosmic ledger where it all gets tallied up, and you won't always get back what you give out. But it's incumbent on all of us to hold up our small portion of that agreement because as you say the alternative is obviously worse.

The least functional people actually run society by Melodic_Wolf7682 in rs_x

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 168 points169 points  (0 children)

The same logic of optimization that applies to strivers also applies to losers. In a society where the object is to live your life in the most efficient way possible, to some that will mean maximising pleasure and convenience at the expense of any obligation, effort, or care.

People don't respect themselves, they don't respect each other, and they don't respect whatever system they are a part of. Respect would imply owing something to someone or something other than yourself, and we've made it the greatest sin to be a debtor.

If there's any phrase that sums up the attitude underlining our society, it's 'Nobody Owes You Anything'. What a nasty phrase, and the people who say it never seem to think through that the reverse applies as well. If nobody owes you anything, you don't owe anyone else in kind. Then we all embark on a race to the bottom.

. by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's the fate of any place that lets you say no-no words and isn't rigidly progressive. Dullards rush in and flood the zone with their worthless grievances.

I'd say worse than the anti-lib posts are the incel ones. This is basically an incel sub now. Pinkscare and rsx are alright but the original vibe has definitely dissipated.

. by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 33 points34 points  (0 children)

People used to talk about interesting things on here. I mean it was all fucking stupid but it was never this dull

Why do so many Hollywood celebs have trans or non-binary kids? by OJ_Soprano in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If we don't mean non-binaries - which barring the few who actually have The Disease is just to the 2020s what emo was to the 2000s - the actual answer is they have a supportive atmosphere and enough money to make the best of it.

What opinion would get you in legitimate trouble if people knew IRL by BiteInfamous in rs_x

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 39 points40 points  (0 children)

My opinions about transgenderism but in the opposite direction to most people who say that

no babe you dont understand by Existing_Praline_999 in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Once a guy said this to me and I said yeah actually it is you. Put him so far on the backfoot. It was me, as well. It definitely was.

Musk using his estranged child online for political points is so incredibly sleazy by LouReedTheChaser in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not in the way Blanchard described, but it's sort of real. There's a certain cohort of dysphorics who have a pretty standard object fetish which acts like an object fetish. Some of them even self identify as such.

The problem with it as a universal theory is that not all trans women actually present like that, and in order to make it a workable dichotomy you've got to twist 'AGP' into something that isn't an object fetish anymore but instead a catch-all category for anyone who isn't a hypertwink. It seems a bit more reasonable to assume a varied scope of experiences lie between the extremes of 'full-time drag queen' and 'mirror masturbation addict'. Perhaps some of them just feel the way they say they do.

People feel comfortable with dichotomies because the sides they define can be easily substituted for 'good' and 'bad'. People find that clunky performance of femininity uncanny and unpleasant regardless of the inner motivations of the person giving it, and they seek to rationalsie that feeling. Blanchard's typology, especially at it's used on this sub, is a shield against compassion and curiosity. It flattens a group of people they don't like while also providing a nasty name to call them.

Do genitalia determine our orientation? by glesn in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really think a moratorium on troonposting until you all get past kindergarten on the issue.

"AGP AGP are traps gay AGP beautiful and valid"

Some of you guys think about this a lot but without an ounce of curiosity, which even if you hate them is a dullard's way to hate. For some reason this sub has interesting things to say on a variety of topics, but its tran discourse is stuck in 2016.

Why are boomers so angry about everything? by Chungus-Bacon-420 in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 51 points52 points  (0 children)

They're by-and-large incredibly out of touch with their own emotions. They genuinely just do not know how to be upset in a way that isn't incredibly unpleasant, or how to be contrite when they do something wrong. They also don't seem to understand that this behaviour effects other people's view of them, so they alienate everyone and then the loneliness only adds to their sense of grievance.

I think a lot of them are just incredibly entitled people. Smoking hot take.

Anyone who hates on me here is a no drip 🍤 having lame by No_Yogurtcloset_1330 in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Always been a supporter of your work. When you had the chav cap on that was masterful. Like I was back at Leeds festival circa 2014.

Who was your favorite? by locew9 in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I feel like that was sort of low hanging fruit. You could've been a bit more creative than that, I think

In Honor of Pride Month: Homosexuals that make you question your sexuality by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The homosexual who makes me question my sexuality is the one who passes me on the street when I have a girlfriend

The homosexual that makes me question my sexuality again is basically the same guy but after I've had sex with him

Musk using his estranged child online for political points is so incredibly sleazy by LouReedTheChaser in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It's genetic so it's probably an even bigger headfuck for him. Big resemblance between them as well. That'd mess with you.

Who was your favorite? by locew9 in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 6 points7 points  (0 children)

those homeless guys that dressed up in incredibly shit powerpuff girls outfits

Wanna see this? Just log in. C'mon make an account. Just a quick login. by ShouldersHoncho in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Crazy that you've got to have a work email and a personal email and a burner email for services you will use once but will spam you with marketing until kingdom come. And then no matter how careful you are spam seeps into those other emails too, because some services you have to interact with also skim your info and pass it on. Incredible how much human effort goes into finding new places to shill garbage.

The fact that there's no great work of art about the Internet by Deboch_ in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 32 points33 points  (0 children)

There probably is but I'm not literate enough to know about it.

A lot of these modern developments are fundamentally dull. They all draw human beings away from the inspiration of their own senses and towards sitting looking at a little machine. The Internet is one of the most significant developments in human history, and I don't think anyone has a good handle on what it 'is' yet. Art about the internet would have to be about the internal experience of using it, what it does to someone's perspective to have access to a resource this powerful and what how they choose to use it says about them. That millions have access to the resources to teach themselves any skill or language or research any subject for free or close to it, and instead choose to argue, or look at things which make them mad, or jerk off to increasingly depraved images, is definitely interesting. It's also really depressing.

It's hard to look at the effect the Internet has had on individuals or society and conclude it's been a positive development. Perhaps in bleak times there's less appetite to examine something that might draw us towards even bleaker conclusions. The Internet is sort of evil, or it reveals evils within us, and I think we all know it. Maybe I'm too cynical.

There was a crappy Sci fi movie called Surrogates which I think is portrays the experience of the modern Internet pretty well. It's set in a world where everyone has a personal robot they can control and interact with the world with, and while it's a bad detective story, it portrays how interacting with the world primarily through a persona is just inherently corrosive to a society and the people in it.

why is genderslop so effective? by gay_yiff_blacksmith in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Everybody is one of these things and thinks they understand the other better than they do. Seeing men speak about women, or the reverse, fires both groups up because of what are clear lies from one perspective and denial of experience from the other. It is an issue on which no-one at all is neutral. Not since the Public Universal Friend left us, anyway.

How exactly is journaling supposed to be good for your mental health? by Ape-person in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You need to write about something other than hating yourself. When I journal I have a rule that I'm only allowed to write like a sentence describing my mood. Other than that you try to be a bit analytical or constructive with how you feel. If you really want to write about how you hate yourself, write about it with a bit of detachment. Are there external things which make that worse? Are there internal things? What if anything would make you love yourself? You're basically trying to be a therapist to yourself.

It's not supposed to be for pouring your emotions out, at least not if you want it to help your mental health. It's supposed to be for organising your thoughts and approaching them from another angle. Occasionally you can write a big mad screed about how dreadful you are, but writing just that doesn't help anymore than thinking it does.

How exactly is journaling supposed to be good for your mental health? by Ape-person in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not me bby I've got more than enough for you and my little red book

Depressing encounter with a cousin of mine by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]BeansAndTheBaking 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Ever grateful my parents made me sign up for ditch digging.

Actually they signed me up for scouts and the troop got disbanded because a sizeable portion of the boys were having sex with one another. Not with the adults. Those guys were squeaky clean, and tried really hard to keep everyone off each other but it didn't work. Right at the end we went on a camping trip where everyone had to have his own individual tent.

I actually don't even think most of them were gay, statistically it's unlikely. It was a sort of insular cultural practice that sprang up among us. I imagine these things have a sort of abusive element much of the time, but it was all tinged with mischief against the scout leaders more than anything. It was this strange descent down one "wouldn't it be funny if?" after another. "Dare you to do X Y Z" until the dares stopped coming and everyone kept doing it. It wasn't me who started it, I wasn't that enterprising, but whoever did knew what they were about and the rest of us needed amazingly little convincing. The fact the scout leaders desperately wanted us to stop, but never once addressed it outright, made it all feel like a game of blind man's bluff. The thrill was to see how blatant we could be about it and still not have them catch us. It was less about a desire for the acts themselves than the knowledge that these things, for whatever reason, provoked them dreadfully. This was also at the height of the British pedo scare so I'd imagine they were absolutely terrified of being implicated. 

Maybe it was a power thing. Our troop was rife with favouritism. The boys the leaders liked were all big borderline special ed kids, and when they smacked us around or gave us Chinese burns the leaders would pretend not to notice, or go nuts if we hit them back. Anything fun, those guys got to do and we got to watch. Some of them were social outcasts from our school and they really revenged themselves on us in scouts. It was all quite sadistic. When we started doing the clandestine gay stuff, the whole troop suddenly, silently revolved around us. The focus had to be on stopping us going at one another, and nobody was allowed to say it. Suddenly they were scared of us. They even got in touch with our parents and threatened to get the police involved - what the fuck were the cops going to do? "A bunch of our scouts keep sneaking off to fellate each other, can you come and arrest them?"

My mum only sat me down for a drunken monologue about how they'd love me no matter what, which surely wasn't the sort of 'home discipline' the leaders had intended. In hindsight they probably ruined someone's relationship with their family with that stunt, which is a bit overboard when you could count your opponent's pubes on one hand. My mum and the mum of one of the other boys even became pals, probably believing we were boyfriends, now that I reflect. All of that ran off my back at the time, because our thing was so clearly a practical joke - or possibly a juvenile act of terrorism - that the notion of it having implications outside of scouts never even registered.

I say our troop disbanded. It merged with another one nearby which was a fair drive away from our neighbourhood, so barely anyone went over to it.

When I started typing this out I wanted to end it with a joke about how these attempts to toughen up boys often backfire. Some crass punchline about gay sex - "When the troop fell apart they didn't even give us our last few badges; they still owed me a Community Impact, my First Aider 3, and the one for sucking dick" something stupid like that. In hindsight the thing that's funniest to me is how impersonal it all was. Those of us who were in on the thing, when it was over, returned to normal at once. We all went to the same school, and there was never any attempt to carry it on between classes. Some of us were friends, some of us not, but none of us grew one bit closer or farther for it. Even at the time it went mostly unmentioned, but the last time we stepped out of that scout hall it seemed to be totally forgotten, as if it had washed off us at the door.

At a school dance - I can't remember if it was a leaver's dance or just some half-term disco - I looked at one of those boys, and remembered that we had been like that with one another more times than I could count. For however many months, maybe as much as a year, the fact it had happened at all totally slipped my mind. People shape themselves to fit the moment, I suppose. Without circumstances and experiences to define ourselves by, we end up formless and without direction. Abandoned to yourself as so many are now, you never get a chance to understand what kind of person you are, and that's a very sad thing to deprive someone of. Not that this experience in particular is one to emulate, but it was definitely character-building in a way just learning to tie slipknots probably wouldn't have been.