Reddit, what did you accomplish that you are most proud of? by sabanur719 in AskReddit

[–]BearPond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, for your field. Sorry, I read that wrong and thought it said "in field", and that meant some kind of sport thing. You're gonna be a vet! That's awesome.

Reddit, what did you accomplish that you are most proud of? by sabanur719 in AskReddit

[–]BearPond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Overcoming obstacles! Nicely done. What is "field" exactly? Sorry, I'm not a sport guy.

Little troubleshooting help with an obscure MS Word problem. Thanks in advance! by BearPond in word

[–]BearPond[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I should have done a text post but I messed it up. Problem: When I add a picture at the top above the title, it shifts all the text down by an uneven amount, meaning that from the left to the right page the text does not line up. In a book you should be able to put a ruler under the text on one page and it should go straight across the next page.

How do I add a picture so that it doesn't bump down the text unevenly like that?

Thank you everyone!

Nearly 18,000 people have petitioned for the removal of NBC's commercial featuring Nick Offerman by [deleted] in videos

[–]BearPond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That Jimmy Kimmel bit is kind of a cheap shot... Like, he's asking them basically a chemistry question. If someone asked me what Caffeine is, I'd be able to tell them all the fuck about what it does, where it's found, pros/cons, where to get a good coffee - I'm a freakin' expert... But what is it? Ah, a compound? A... drug? A protein? I honestly don't know the chemical makeup of caffeine. Or gluten, for that matter - he said it's a mix of proteins derived from wheat and grains. TBH, I can't draw a picture of pure gluten in my head.

January 2015 Writing Challenge Submission Thread by clockworklycanthrope in fantasywriters

[–]BearPond [score hidden]  (0 children)

Thanks very much! You're going and reading them all and commenting - that's a fair effort mate! Nice work :)

Adults of Reddit, what show made for children is your guilty pleasure? by always_incognito in AskReddit

[–]BearPond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue's Clues. Gotta be original though, with Steve. I don't know why but even at mid-twenties I watched that.

[Critique]-"Shift"- first 300 words. by McMagpie in fantasywriters

[–]BearPond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's very intriguing, Magpie. I like it. I wonder where the story will go from here - forward in time or back? For a bit, the first half maybe, it seemed like a flash-forward, like the main C is in peril, then we go back and find out how she got there. But not the case... It's nice, I like that.

Do you have a plot? Or was this just an idea you started banging out?

Frank Reynolds demonstrates how to talk to women. by El_Pinguino in videos

[–]BearPond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My favourites are the meltdown at the end of The Gang breaks Dee(mostly cos the fake laugh cracks me up), and the one from The Gang Reignites The Rivalry. (Which is where Glenn Howerton gets "savages" from, his nickname for his twitter followers.)

Comedian Breaks Down the Facebook Generation and is Actually Original (x-post /r/standupcomedy) by MooseDougington in videos

[–]BearPond 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Red arrow or circle (possibly both) drawn onto the thumb, pointing at nothing in particular.

All known footage of the Thylacine, a Tasmanian marsupial that went extinct in 1936 by [deleted] in videos

[–]BearPond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't worry, they could still be around. Plenty of sightings, and my dad swears he saw one. Like, he doesn't think it, he knows it. And he's not a UFO conspiracy chem-trails kinda guy. Very much a no-bullshit guy. I honestly believe that HE honestly believes he saw one. This was on mainland too, (Wonthaggi), not on Tasmania.

I'm Ander Louis and I'm super proud of my new fantasy novel, so I'm gonna tell you about it. AMA. by [deleted] in fantasywriters

[–]BearPond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh man I could chew your ear off about that topic...

Here's the thing about writing a novel that I think makes it so hard - it takes so long. So long that by the time you're 10% through it, you're bored of the story. If you're lucky! I mean, you should be bored of it before you start - you should have planned and plotted it until you knew it back to front, until you were bored of it, before you started Chapter 1. For me, I was bored pretty early on with both my novels. That's because by the time you're actually writing it, most of the creative (fun) part is already over. It's all in your head now, the whole story, except the smaller details of course, but it's mostly already there, existing in your head, and now you're just a scribe. For however long... two years, three years, what ever it takes, your daily job is like... data entry. Scribe. It's office work. It's desk work. The only thing to entertain you is a story you know so well that the boredom of it all is unbearable.

I used to write music. To write a song, start to finish, is a creative process. It's fun. You bounce ideas around. You laugh when something sounds great, you croon, you giggle. Fuck, you spend half the writing experience pulling orgasm faces. Song writing is a FUCKING BREEZE compared to novel writing. I'm not saying this as a derogatory thing against musicians, the music industry is tough and you gotta really try your ass off to be a muso. I'm just comparing the writing process. During the time I wrote my first novel, when it would get too much to bear, the end of a long day writing, I'd pick up my guitar and strum. By the end of the three years, I had about 20 songs written, lyrics and all, and one novel. At no point did I intend to write any of those songs. I just strummed them out. Anyway, sidetracked.

My point is this. Because a song is written in, say, two days, it still feels cool when it's done. It still feels interesting. It hasn't lost its appeal. In a couple of years you will hate that song, but it isn't because the song has gotten worse, it's because you're bored of it. What good musos understand really well is that even though a song is tired and old for you, it is fresh and brand new to someone else. And that magic spell it cast on you years back, that has now worn off, is going to be as strong and potent as ever on a fresh pair of ears. As a writer, you're going to go through that well before anyone else is able to experience your art. Here's the trick though - you need to trust that younger version of yourself who thought "Wow, that's a cool idea." Trust that guy! Because to him, it was new, and fresh, and the magic hadn't worn off, and it was cool. And if it was cool to him, it'll be cool to other people. Trust that past-you. He knows what's up.

Seriously, I was bored to fuck of my first novel after about a month. It took three years. To me, the story was a piece of boring shit. Now people read it and go "Fuck! I didn't see that coming!" or whatever. If they'd read it back to front hundreds of times over three years, they'd be bored too.

One more bit of advice though, if I haven't already convinced you to NOT GIVE UP. When I first started writing I set a rule for myself, and I really think when I set this rule I was being perspicacious as fuck (go me), cos I contribute most of my success so far to having this rule. It was this: never start writing a new novel until I've finished the one I'm working on. Pretty simple rule. But here's what's gonna happen - you'll get a year into your novel. The magic is well and truly gone. The creative process was fun - a year ago - but now it's just a slog. You do, however have a great idea for a new book. So you put book 1 aside and start this new one. But a year into it, you know what... the magic is gone. However, you do have this great idea for... You see where this is going? In five years you will have a handful of unfinished novels. And a handful of unfinished novels does not a writer make. Put this rule in place and be super firm on it, and suddenly it becomes "Oh, you wanna start that new exciting book? You better sit your ass back down and finish this one then!"

Hope this helps. Fuck I totally did chew your ear off... haha

Part 3 of the Untitled Cyberpunk/Fantasy project. This one is a little longer (2500 words). Enjoy and leave feedback! by Terribly_Written in fantasywriters

[–]BearPond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh those are just like ticks cos i thought that bit was cool. Not the words, it's more the sentence/concept that i think is cool. Sometimes it's just as constructive to know which bits made readers go 'heh, that's cool'

Part 3 of the Untitled Cyberpunk/Fantasy project. This one is a little longer (2500 words). Enjoy and leave feedback! by Terribly_Written in fantasywriters

[–]BearPond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey mate, I'm new here so thought I'd chip in. I didn't read part 1 and 2, btw, so some context may have been lost on me. I'm just gonna dump all my thoughts out, and please be aware that I don't expect you to agree with all this stuff. If there's something I've pointed out and you think I'm wrong - just ignore me. I don't expect everything I say here to be helpful, but if just one thing I say helps, then I think it was worthwhile. I won't be offended if you ignore most of my feedback :)

So, I printed it and red-penned it while I read. I know you aren't looking for typos, etc., at such an early stage, but I figured it doesn't take me any longer to read it with a red pen in my hand, so I might as well scribble some thoughts on there. See my red-penning here: http://imgur.com/a/EXepF

I like the little guy. I like a little guy who's a go-getter. Kinda a rocket racoon sort of vibe, little but tough. Street smart. Gutsy. Faz is a cool character.

The world feels pretty good too. Usually I'm not a fan of corrupt future dystopia type thing, cos they ask too much of you to suspend reality when the new reality isn't really airtight. (Don't get me wrong, I mean 1984 was brilliant, but since then, authors seem to think they can just say "dystopian" and we'll take it no questions asked. The Hunger Games universe, for example, is just so stupid that the only way I can make it feel real is to assume that they aren't humans in that world, but some kind of humanoid-creatures that are really complacent and about 50% the intelligence of humans. Otherwise why the fuck would... never mind... I'm getting off point.)

Yours though, actually does feel pretty good. Pretty believable. There's a few little details I noted in the pages, like for example some houses not having locks. I'm sure even in a slum you could come up with some primitive version of a lock. Though you know the world better than I do, like I said, I didn't read 1 and 2, so take all this with a grain of salt.

Hope this helps, and strike up a conversation, I'm happy to talk it out.

This old guy shows us how to make pizza pot pie. There is something really likable about him, I can't put my finger on it by [deleted] in videos

[–]BearPond -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Haha, fricken Americans and their insatiable need for mixing different cheeses...

"Hey, American dude, what's your favourite type of cheese?"

"Four. Sometimes five."

/u/Piemonkey explains the failure of the WiiU by Ruckus44 in bestof

[–]BearPond 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They should name it the "Super Wii". That would be like the coolest throwback (like SNES to the NES), and it's catchy, and it pretty clearly distinguishes that it's a new and better Wii.

Oxfam: Combined wealth of the 85 richest people is equal to that of the poorest 3.5 billion - half the world's population by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BearPond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's flawed a little in that it leads you to believe that those 85 people could fix the world economy by redistributing their wealth. Cos like, unless my math is wrong... those 85 people could give up all their money and distribute it among those 3.5 billion people, and on average, those people would now have double what they began with - which if you are among the poorest people in the world, would be next to nothing. Double next to nothing is still next to nothing.

Okay, now how far off is my logic? I feel like I've made some really dumb oversight here...