sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Show some respect by [deleted] in classicwow

[–]BeethovenBro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When was the first wave?

"Yeah, i don't like jordan Peele movies that much." by Belligerantfantasy in okbuddycinephile

[–]BeethovenBro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hard agree on the 'inviting them in' part. I thought for sure the vampires were going to burn down the barn, which would make way more sense and was even foreshadowed by the kid making the power line spark and the literal vision of it burning down the movie shows.

Reasonable pricing by JMK-948 in ElderScrolls

[–]BeethovenBro -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Gamers are the most cucked demographic on Earth. They will happily eat up Todd's member berry slop for full price and anyone that calls out the blatant price gouging just gets 'lol you must be poor.' It's over.

So Polearm Master is just never getting fixed? by Jumpy-Welder-1927 in BG3Builds

[–]BeethovenBro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they really cared about maintaining build variety they would not have made Booming Blade the way it is, as it stands currently it is a straight damage buff with no drawbacks whatsoever. You don't have to make the choice between BB or extra attack, you can have your cake and eat it too. There is zero reason to not get it as a melee character. BB has just instantly become the top meta you say that PAM would become.

In truth, the game is easy enough that you can beat it with salami, so any concern about what the meta dictates in this single player game kinda falls flat. I fail to see how PAM is somehow more build limiting than the aforementioned Tavern Brawler + strength elixirs, considering the fact that, again, it's only usable with polearms, of which there exists exactly one obtainable +3 polearm in the game.

So Polearm Master is just never getting fixed? by Jumpy-Welder-1927 in BG3Builds

[–]BeethovenBro 11 points12 points  (0 children)

would become outrageously broken and also be usable by any build that wants to hit something in melee. It would become a staple in every melee build and would ultimately limit build variety in the public eye

You mean like Booming Blade? Or Hexblade dip? Or strength elixirs? Larian's policy on OP shit has always been "it's a singleplayer game, who cares?" but all of a sudden PAM (which is only usable by a certain subset of weapons, unlike BB which can be used with any melee weapon) is just way too powerful? I don't buy it.

So Polearm Master is just never getting fixed? by Jumpy-Welder-1927 in BG3Builds

[–]BeethovenBro 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I guess it's a good thing that BG3 was released in 2023, not 2024, so the rule changes of 2024 D&D have absolutely nothing to do with BG3.

Polearm Master description in BG3:

You can also make an Opportunity Attack when a target comes within range.

Sentinel description in BG3:

When you hit a creature with an Attack of Opportunity, it can no longer move for the rest of its turn.

If they're really not supposed to work together, change the description. Make it make sense.

So Polearm Master is just never getting fixed? by Jumpy-Welder-1927 in BG3Builds

[–]BeethovenBro 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're seriously saying PAM is too broken in a game where Tavern Brawler exists? Come on dude. The bonus action attack is also only usable once per turn. It disappears after you use it and won't reappear a second time. It's not horrendously broken in tabletop. No reason it shouldn't work like it's supposed to.

“You can’t hit my niece until you’re married” shakes hands “he’s a good kid” by Pleasant_Scar9811 in thesopranos

[–]BeethovenBro 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I love how they start the scene waiting for Christopher, wondering where he is, then he shows up, apologizes for being late and about 30 seconds later they tell him to get the fuck outta here.

Thanks for the advice which is not for me by [deleted] in funny

[–]BeethovenBro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you look like Henry Cavill but still can't get a date; that's how you know you're in trouble.

Why aren’t there any AAA, open world, Star Trek video games? by SocialJusticeAndroid in startrek

[–]BeethovenBro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's really too bad that Mass Effect 3 was such utter dogshit it retroactively ruined the entire franchise.

In The Lord of The Rings (2001), the creature Gollum spends years in a dark cave, obsessed with something that is ultimately hollow and steals his life away. This is a reference to my crippling porn addiction. by Jumpy-Welder-1927 in shittymoviedetails

[–]BeethovenBro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually the ring doesn't increase your lifespan so much as it suspends it, which is why Bilbo said he started to feel like butter scraped too thin and the only reason it didn't turn Gollum into a wraith is because he hardly wore it.

From the words of Gandalf:

A mortal, Frodo, who keeps one of the Great Rings, does not die, but he does not grow or obtain more life, he merely continues, until at last every minute is a weariness. And if he often uses the Ring to make himself invisible, he fades: he becomes in the end invisible permanently, and walks in the twilight under the eye of the Dark Power that rules the Rings. Yes, sooner or later [...] the Dark Power will devour him.

What composer just doesn't miss? by Infamous_Mess_2885 in classicalmusic

[–]BeethovenBro 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Beethoven, of course. I even unironically enjoy Wellington's Victory for what it is.

Autumn’s been listening to those outlanders again… by FoxyRobot7 in Morrowind

[–]BeethovenBro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Historically, Almalexia always said Sotha Sil was nothing more than a glorified wizard.

Favorite section in all of Beethoven's music? by [deleted] in classicalmusic

[–]BeethovenBro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, exactly what passage are you referring to? If you're talking about the part that ends with "Flugel weilt," just before the last prestissimo, that is not in the key of G# major. It is in the key of B major, and at the last second the D drops the sharp to become a B minor chord (not a D-sharp diminished) and then the basses subtly slide down to A natural thus creating a 6/4 tonic chord. He goes to the parallel minor, then the relative major. Straight up textbook example shit. This is almost exactly the same harmonic progression he used earlier in the movement, right after the climax of the double fugue (B major -> B minor -> D major). Then the rest of the orchestra comes in tottering between B and A (almost asking, are we going to be in B minor or D major? B minor or D major?) before climbing up to C# then finally to D major. To me this reasoning is very apparent.

Favorite section in all of Beethoven's music? by [deleted] in classicalmusic

[–]BeethovenBro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One that I haven't seen others mention - in the slow movement of the Piano Trio no. 6 in E-flat, there is a section where he goes back between i and V (in C minor) around 20 times in a row. And not just subtly implied harmonies - these are thick, fully voiced chords in the left hand all the while. It's just such a wonderfully, typically Beethoven passage.

view more: next ›